Sure. Just an attempt to put it in context rather than treating 'Trumpism' as a curiosity that isn't connected to, say, Nixon and Reagan's Southern strategies for example.its not new but it is evolving
It was 8% of black women and 18% of black men wasn't it?a campaign in which Trump only got 8% of the Black vote and killed his highest-profile Black supporter is being hailed as the GOP's best performance in 60 years,
totally - that Friendly Fascism book about the US right is 40 years old, and that was already documenting something in motionSure. Just an attempt to put it in context rather than treating 'Trumpism' as a curiosity that isn't connected to, say, Nixon and Reagan's Southern strategies for example.
I know that there's talk of other racial groups increasing support for this stuff but needs more evidence tbh - as well as a serious response from the US left
It awful.
It was 8% of black women and 18% of black men wasn't it?
It was 8% of black women and 18% of black men wasn't it?
The new messaging appears to be closely coordinated, and it includes an appeal to Trump to preserve his “legacy” by showing grace in defeat. The message is being carried on Fox News and in the Wall Street Journal and the New York Post – all outlets avidly consumed by Trump himself, especially Fox.
One Fox News host, Laura Ingraham, an intimate of the president ever since she spoke at the 2016 Republican national convention, made an astounding statement that seemed directed at Trump personally, advising him to accept defeat “if and when that does happen” with “grace and composure” and appealing to his sense of his own legacy.
Ingraham said in part: “If and when it’s time to accept an unfavourable outcome in this election, and we hope it never comes, but if and when that does happen, president Trump needs to do it with the same grace and composure he demonstrated at that town hall with Savannah Guthrie. So many people remarked about his tone and presence. Exactly what he needs.
Is there any regional breakdown at all? Just wondering if say, rural Southern blacks have stayed solid D while the urban vote has changedI think Edison Research put it around there - Associated Press put it at 8%, up 2% from 2016 - 12% of Black men and 6% of Black women,. NPR Choice page
Murdoch despises losers as much as Trump doesGraun reporting that the Murdoch media seem to be abandoning Trump.
Exactly when has Donald Trump ever done anything with grace and composure?
It isn't that, he's just thinking of the georgia run offMurdoch despises losers as much as Trump does
Trouble is with these looking back something in motion things is that it isnt a linear path nor was it inevitable. Did anyone on here argue that when Obama was elected that a candidate like Trump would/could win the election?totally - that Friendly Fascism book about the US right is 40 years old, and that was already documenting something in motion
IMO the biggest difference is growing economic hardship, the rights inability of offer financial reward/better living standards to parts of the working class (at the cost of other parts) - its an economic system in crisis. That changes the nature of the offer and message profoundly.
Is there any regional breakdown at all? Just wondering if say, rural Southern blacks have stayed solid D while the urban vote has changed
Is there any regional breakdown at all? Just wondering if say, rural Southern blacks have stayed solid D while the urban vote has changed
Here is the exit poll data. This indicates falling support for Trump among white men and growing support among black (from a very low base) and Latino voters
This is interesting, concerning populism:
Thread by @EmporersNewC on Thread Reader App
Thread by @EmporersNewC: 1. So, why does it matter that Joe Biden’s electoral college win does not rely on Pennsylvania? 2. You will notice that Trump’s focus on electoral fraud is directed at places like Philadelp...…threadreaderapp.com
I can't link to that. But how does it weight for mail-in votes? Exit polls aren't a straightforward thing in this election, and missing the on-the-day bias might explain the difference between this and the other stuff.
One thing Trump got right, perhaps the last thing he got right, was when he called himself Mr Brexit back in 2016. Those demographic breakdowns are strikingly similar.I think Edison Research put it around there - Associated Press put it at 8%, up 2% from 2016 - 12% of Black men and 6% of Black women,. NPR Choice page
I don't see this would happen anywhere in the South tbh. Black voters in the South know exactly how the battle lines are drawn and that hasn't changed for centuriesI haven't seen any regional breakdown, but it definitely seems like Georgia voters weren't part of the trend.
They're not but the impact of those trends on party support proceeds at a glacial pace and is slowed down every time the GOP (or Tories for that matter) find a way to fuck about with it. Perhaps they always will idkI don't see too much for Republican strategists not to be worried about. Were it not for their inbuilt advantage in the system, they'd be seriously fucked. Demographic trends are not their friends at the moment.
There were swings in all kinds of different places, geographical and demographical. There always are but this election seems, perhaps, more complex than mostidk about all this focus on the apparent increased share of votes he got from black people, i think you'd have to know did they believe him that the other side were communists who were going to take all their money in taxes, did they align with him on being anti-lockdown, those sorts of things, i think those will turn out to have been important to how many people outside his established base did vote for trump this time.
Even as the infection numbers are peaking there a lot of people are clearly 'over' the whole boring virus thing, and that might end up having actually drawn people to him rather than what everyone expected, all the movement being the other way.
Plus if it is a shift, it's a small one. And it's still somewhere close to 90% Democrat. I think it's a non-story really. Same with the supposed loss of Latino support. That's a particularly diverse group of people, and it's still strongly Dem. There are no historic shifts going on there.idk about all this focus on the apparent increased share of votes he got from black people, i think you'd have to know did they believe him that the other side were communists who were going to take all their money in taxes, did they align with him on being anti-lockdown, those sorts of things, i think those will turn out to have been important to how many people outside his established base did vote for trump this time.
yep. I think I read that they reckon white women, again, the majority of them went for trump. That is more interesting to me, as a thing to try to understand.Plus if it is a shift, it's a small one. And it's still somewhere close to 90% Democrat. I think it's a non-story really. Same with the supposed loss of Latino support. That's a particularly diverse group of people, and it's still strongly Dem. There are no historic shifts going on there.
The real issue is why do so many older middle-income white people with no college education vote Republican. That's a bigger group of people, although it is shrinking.
Some have argued on here that Trumpism might just melt away but this article touches on the question is it possible to have Trumpism without Trump ie populist conservatism that appeals to the working class.
despite all the talk of Trump provoking a “political realignment” around an economically populist brand of conservatism, his signature legislative achievement—the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act—is indistinguishable from what one might have expected from a Jeb Bush administration. Add in steel tariffs and minor tweaks to NAFTA, and we’re back to Bush 43’s first term.
The anti communist stuff will find a resonance in most groupings tbh but lets not be surprised that the colour of ones skin protects people from having conservative veiws and beleiving its possible to make it in society given a helping hand . Trump also talked about rising wages, improving employment and funding opportunity through his Platinum Plan .The fact that Trump improved on his votes even after the BLM campaign says something.idk about all this focus on the apparent increased share of votes he got from black people, i think you'd have to know did they believe him that the other side were communists who were going to take all their money in taxes, did they align with him on being anti-lockdown, those sorts of things, i think those will turn out to have been important to how many people outside his established base did vote for trump this time.
Even as the infection numbers are peaking there a lot of people are clearly 'over' the whole boring virus thing, and that might end up having actually drawn people to him rather than what everyone expected, all the movement being the other way.
Can't see any Republicans voting for donkeys in blue. Elephants in red maybe(ignoring RP voters who would vote for a donkey wearing a blue rosette
If you look at photos of the audience in trump rallies, almost all are wearing masks in some areas (but not all)