In electoral terms I agree except Biden’s ground game is pretty poor, non existent in Florida, although Florida is not as important as it once was. ‘Joe Biden has no ground game in Florida.’ Will Mike Bloomberg’s money change that?I'm a bit less hopeful - tho overwhelmingly because I thought it was so hard for Clinton to lose last time - pretty much everything had to go right for Trump for him to win. But it did.
Three key differences this time, i think:
Misogyny - there's barely any political difference between Clinton and Biden, but there is that gender difference. There are sadly more than one or two people who just couldn't bring themselves to vote for a woman as there CinC. That's probably worth a point.
Lack of complacency - Clinton really blew it by failing to campaign in various states she saw as a shoo-in. Complete idiocy which isn't being repeated this time. Worth a couple of points, in key states.
Money - I think the dems have actually been clever this time. They've made Trump waste money on pointless ads that, draining his slush fund. It seemed utterly absurd when Bloomberg threw his hat in so late in the game, but now I think it was all just a ploy. Trump wasted millions on an ad in the Superbowl, because Bloomberg did. That's money he hasn't got to spend later (ie, now) when it is actually critical. Playing up to his ego, his unwillingness to be outdone was smart.
Of course Biden could well still blow it with a lousy performance tonight, but if he keeps his cool, Trump will be in a whole lot of shit.
Hopefully there will be a recording available tomorrow, no way am I staying up till 1am to watch it live.
2020 Trump Tulsa rally - WikipediaFox News recorded an average of 7.7 million viewers that night (peaking at 8.2 near the 9:00 p.m. EDT hour), which it stated was its highest Saturday primetime viewership in network history.[34]
the first one of those is interesting. There is a definite advantage for Trump in that he will be far keener on face to face to canvassing at the moment, while Biden is 'responsible.' Not so sure about the polls narrowing tho, most still give Biden a strong lead - with the exception being Massachusetts uni giving complketely contradcitory numbers (Biden leading by 9 one day, but Trump leading by 4 in a poll begun the next day?!).In electoral terms I agree except Biden’s ground game is pretty poor, non existent in Florida, although Florida is not as important as it once was. ‘Joe Biden has no ground game in Florida.’ Will Mike Bloomberg’s money change that?
His Michigan game is not good either and that is an important state. 'Worse than Hillary': Michael Moore says Biden ground game failing in swing state Michigan
They've made Trump waste money on pointless ads, draining his slush fund.
The faithful are faithful and will remain so till they die. Which could well be before November.None of that will dent him. It may actually work in his favour. It will demonstrate to the faithful that the system is out to demolish him, so they’ve be more motivated to support him. Drain the swamp!
He’s their champion, and they’re rooting for him as they do for their football team. The more like a wounded warrior he seems, the more they’ll work to carry him over the finish line.
It's fuck all if you've lost the swingers.
The faithful are faithful and will remain so till they die. Which could well be before November.
It’s the ones who voted for Obama in 2012 who switched or stayed at home that matter.
They matter for sure. Whether or not they’re motivated is the issue.
None of that will dent him. It may actually work in his favour. It will demonstrate to the faithful that the system is out to demolish him, so they’ve be more motivated to support him. Drain the swamp!
He’s their champion, and they’re rooting for him as they do for their football team. The more like a wounded warrior he seems, the more they’ll work to carry him over the finish line.
Why will fewer people be motivated this time? It was a very low turnout last time, I can’t see it being that low again.
'the faithful' is never enough of a political constituency by themselves - if trump wins, it won't be because of the fervour of his base. Corbyn had a massive army of faithful campaigners last year, look what good that did him. It's fuck all if you've lost the swingers.
Defense is half of US discretionary spending (@ about $650billion.) How is putting a watchdog in the Pentagon who has no defence experience draining the swamp? The bloke has tried to sell it as a virtue, that it would make him an arbiter of fact and that speaking truth to power was crucial. Taking him at his word; I think not having a scooby and being dependant on others for insight would make for a watchdog less capable of judging which facts were pertinent.
That’s the same as last time, and while there is something in it, four years of trump will motivate a few. Don’t forget how close many states were, it only takes a small swing for several states to change.
Because they they don’t see Joe as a viable alternative. Because they’re worried that if Trump loses his tantrum will be so monumental that the risk is too great, they don’t want to trigger him. Because “what’s the bloody point”. Because they don’t want a “socialist” as much as /more than they don’t don’t want Trump. Because they don’t trust the process (rigged ballot blah blah). Because of that pathological absenteeism I spoke of. Because they don’t feel eel courted or appeased enough to vote. Because their friends/family are voting differently to them and it undermine some their own determination to vote (polls suggest this is happening). So many reasons.
I might be wrong, I hope I'm wrong. But I got a bad feeling about this.
you missed a big one - people who don’t bother voting because their vote won’t make a difference to the outcome, which is the situation in a majority of states which always fall to the same party. Proportional delegates would make their votes count and might get a few more out voting.
That isn’t that far off what the yanks (or we) do. It’s just that their regions are a damned sight larger - except for the ones that aren’t. The uk has elected governments who lost the overall vote. Managed to elect a government with only 35% of the vote.Never really understand why they need an electoral college. So, no, their votes don't really count.
I like our system. Regions elect someone to parliament, party with the most elected members form the government.
Simple idea.
At the end of election day, we know who is in power.
That isn’t that far off what the yanks (or we) do. It’s just that their regions are a damned sight larger - except for the ones that aren’t. The uk has elected governments who lost the overall vote. Managed to elect a government with only 35% of the vote.
Four hung Canadian parliaments in recent years too.