Fraser Nelson was the worst but only just.ETA2 Oh God, it's absolutely appalling. Should be compulsory listening for everyone posting on this thread...
Fraser Nelson was the worst but only just.ETA2 Oh God, it's absolutely appalling. Should be compulsory listening for everyone posting on this thread...
Fraser Nelson was the worst but only just.
Evan Davis saying that they'd not mentioned Oxbridge near the end? A weird cosy little chat. Complete lack of self awareness.Is it just me or was it utterly bizarre that they were talking about the elite like *they weren't* the elite?
Helen Lewis-Hasteley - uniting intersectionalistas in hate, it seems:
http://helenlewiswrites.tumblr.com/private/58945967745/tumblr_mrwgk8ptIu1rpijql
Evan Davis saying that they'd not mentioned Oxbridge near the end? A weird cosy little chat. Complete lack of self awareness.
No you didn't. You shat yourself and said we all should. At least you said something political that time.
On R4 now:
Summer NightsWhat's the Point of an Elite?
Evan Davis asks why our elites are so resilient and what purpose they serve.
All bar one (an American) of the panellists went to private/public schools and all apart from Fraser Nelson and the American to Oxbridge. The panel of course, are talking about 'the elite' as the other.
ETA: Sorry, Maurice Glasman went to a comprehensive -- he mumbled something or other so looked him up to check.
ETA2 Oh God, it's absolutely appalling. Should be compulsory listening for everyone posting on this thread... (Baggsy first shot at Fraser Nelson when he's up against the wall.)
On the front page of her blog, this quote from her appears:
“The challenge is to make online abuse as despised as racism at football matches.”
— Being optimistic about Twitter, rape threats and internet sexism in the Financial Times.
...equating herself with a victim of racism because she got some strong criticism of her blog posts. Stay classy.
she's quite happy to discriminate against people on the basis of access to the internet i see.Tempting offer from LP:
https://twitter.com/pennyred/status/370482127907069952
maybe you should have kept quietMaybe I should stayed on the Internet and said something political.
Rape threats are pretty serious even if it is online.
Obviously there is a lot of online misogyny, it's an easy channel for every kind of unreflective response and posting that relies on anger, self-righteousness and hate seems particularly addictive. Personally, I wouldn't have thought twitter was a space worth defending, my reaction is why fucking bother? but obviously other women disagree and if you're a journalist then it's part of your job.ccccccccc`1q
ETA: I wasn't going to post that but it seems I did. Maybe it was the cat.
Tempting offer from LP:
https://twitter.com/pennyred/status/370482127907069952
My ebook, #cybersexism, is out today. Can't afford 1.50? Email me (on website) and you can have it in exchange for short review of any kind.
Unpaid interns. Nice try. Interns are just office based apprenticeships. The term doesn't mean you won't get paid.
The well known charity I'm currently working for uses a lot of unpaid interns. This is not a poor organisation either.
Bit derogatory to apprenticeships, given that what internships generally are, are work trials in shape and duration, where the putative employer gets to assess your "fit" to their company without any of the responsibilities and obligations that an apprenticeship places on employers.
An internship is a method of on-the-job training for white-collar and professional careers.[1][2] Internships for professional careers are similar to apprenticeships for trade and vocational jobs.
And when did 'intern' even enter common usage here? What happened to 'work experience'? Or is using 'intern' an admission it's not work experience, it's a proper job even if you probably aren't getting paid for it? '(Imagine slave labour' is seen as being a bit too descriptive...)
An apprenticeship is a multi-year contractual commitment between parties that exchanges labour for training and remuneration, and imposes specific obligations on both parties.
An internship has few contractual commitments, is almost always of a year or less duration (to skirt employment law), and is more often than not has no remuneration beyond expenses incurred - sometimes not even that.
Hardly the same, despite what the fuckwit's encyclopedia says.
It can't skirt all employment law by making it less than one (or two years' since last April) duration - for example it can't skirt NMW legislation. Trouble with that, though, is that interns would have to lodge a claim to get a ruling. Hardly any of them do.An apprenticeship is a multi-year contractual commitment between parties that exchanges labour for training and remuneration, and imposes specific obligations on both parties.
An internship has few contractual commitments, is almost always of a year or less duration (to skirt employment law), and is more often than not has no remuneration beyond expenses incurred - sometimes not even that.
Hardly the same, despite what the fuckwit's encyclopedia says.
I don't think apprenticeships - proper structured ones that lead to real skills and qualifications - are far from desirable.To be fair they're both far from desirable. I'm not necessarily saying internships are a good thing even paid ones.
I don't think apprenticeships - proper structured ones that lead to real skills and qualifications - are far from desirable.
what isn't?Still exploitative.
When did I shit myself?
When I shit myself? The bit when I worked and saved to go to Nepal to go do a little something. Maybe I should stayed on the Internet and said something political.
Not as exploitative as what is replacing them - having to go to college and take out a massive loan to pay for it.Still exploitative.
Not as exploitative as what is replacing them - having to go to college and take out a massive loan to pay for it.
what isn't?
but they are still being exploited.Those lucky enough to be part of a decent workers coop.
but they are still being exploited.
An apprenticeship is a multi-year contractual commitment between parties that exchanges labour for training and remuneration, and imposes specific obligations on both parties.
An internship has few contractual commitments, is almost always of a year or less duration (to skirt employment law), and is more often than not has no remuneration beyond expenses incurred - sometimes not even that.
Hardly the same, despite what the fuckwit's encyclopedia says.