Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The kulaks are revolting - does Urban back big farmer?

What do we do with the farmers?

  • Stop the tax grab.

    Votes: 10 10.5%
  • Stop the subsidies

    Votes: 9 9.5%
  • Send them to the gulags

    Votes: 12 12.6%
  • Send Jeremy Clarkson and Nigel Farage to the gulags

    Votes: 63 66.3%
  • Re-educate the Urban population.

    Votes: 10 10.5%
  • Re-educate the rural population.

    Votes: 7 7.4%
  • Nationalise all large farms with no compensation and collectivise

    Votes: 34 35.8%
  • Ignore, It'll soon be forgotten like the Cuntryside Alliance was.

    Votes: 17 17.9%
  • The Liberal Denocrats are winning here

    Votes: 5 5.3%

  • Total voters
    95
Farmers have always pleaded poverty. An old farmer in my village use to tell people that he was so poor that he didn't know where his next meal was coming from but when he died he left a small fortune...most of it in used notes hidden under the floorboards.

Farmers have always had an aversion to paying tax.
Just reading about a poor local farming lad protesting whose family farm makes only 3,000 quid a year after tax….


One quick sweep of his Facebook page shows his family farm includes 260 acres, four properties the family rents out, and he appears to spend more time skiiing/exotic holidaying and flying first class than the average Cumbrian hill farmer

His 90 year old grand parents own the lot which indicates this lads problem is a inter-generational estate planning issue rather than an unfair socialist tax opportunity

Tax them till they squeal
 
His ranting about "typical BBC" is rather odd isn't it? Surely his fame and a significant part of his wealth is due to Top Gear which I seem to recall was shown on the BBC.
Woke BBC kicked him out and all he did was sing a little song about N****ERS and punch a member of crew who he called a lazy irish cunt for not bringing him his food fast enough...typical BBC
 
Tax the fucking fuckers

View attachment 451725
Duke of Buccleuch at the top?...
addtext_com_MDQwOTQzMjI4MzM.png

bf51d55b-6d5d-451f-beef-415673332d9f_text.gif
 
Just reading about a poor local farming lad protesting whose family farm makes only 3,000 quid a year after tax….


One quick sweep of his Facebook page shows his family farm includes 260 acres, four properties the family rents out, and he appears to spend more time skiiing/exotic holidaying and flying first class than the average Cumbrian hill farmer

His 90 year old grand parents own the lot which indicates this lads problem is a inter-generational estate planning issue rather than an unfair socialist tax opportunity

Tax them till they squeal
If only the wealthy would pay their fair share of tax instead of trying to worm their way out of it then the pensioners could still have their winter fuel allowance.
 
they own tons of the best land here, built another business park, got a local Academy named for them and their massive pile is 6 miles up the stamford road. So when the day comes I can bike up there and turn it into barracks.
Get it right, one of their massive piles:

The family seats are Bowhill House, three miles from Selkirk, representing the Scott line; Drumlanrig Castle in Dumfries and Galloway, representing the Douglas line; and Boughton House in Northamptonshire, England, representing the Montagu line. These three houses are still lived in by the family and are also open to the public. The family also owns Dalkeith Palace in Midlothian, which is let, and has owned several other country houses and castles in the past.
 
Get it right, one of their massive piles:

The family seats are Bowhill House, three miles from Selkirk, representing the Scott line; Drumlanrig Castle in Dumfries and Galloway, representing the Douglas line; and Boughton House in Northamptonshire, England, representing the Montagu line. These three houses are still lived in by the family and are also open to the public. The family also owns Dalkeith Palace in Midlothian, which is let, and has owned several other country houses and castles in the past.
ah yes, thats why we've got an Earl of Dalkieth pub in town here, 500 odd miles south.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Sue
Just reading about a poor local farming lad protesting whose family farm makes only 3,000 quid a year after tax….


One quick sweep of his Facebook page shows his family farm includes 260 acres, four properties the family rents out, and he appears to spend more time skiiing/exotic holidaying and flying first class than the average Cumbrian hill farmer

His 90 year old grand parents own the lot which indicates this lads problem is a inter-generational estate planning issue rather than an unfair socialist tax opportunity

Tax them till they squeal
Take a leaf out of Chucky 3's family album and hasten grandad and grandma into the Choir Eternal
They definitely don't see it like that, there's a lot of talk about positive opinions of farming after programming like "Clarkson's Farm" and lots seem to genuinely believe that the public are very much behind them.
Tbh that's true of pretty much every single protest movement ever. It's natural that people to think that the thing that is most important to them is also important to others.
Personally I think this is going to be like VAT on private school fees, it won't affect very many, there is a larger but still small number that will get wound up about it thinking it will affect them whereas the majority might agree or disagree but since if won't effect them will just shrug indifferently. I'm in that group.
 
Have to say, even as these whingeing rural bosses fall out of the billionaire news agenda, I still feel as angered about their fucking protest. The fucking nerve of these wealthy tax dodgers to take to the streets when they're still afforded a massively favourable 50% reduction & 10 year interest free pay-off scheme compared to what anyone else might be expected to pay.

Nasty, greedy tory cunts behind this performative display and a load of gullible farmy barmy types without the wit to see how they're being used as cover for the billionaires.
 
If only the wealthy would pay their fair share of tax instead of trying to worm their way out of it then the pensioners could still have their winter fuel allowance.

Nonsense. The decision to cut the Winter Fuel Allowance was a politcal choice not a necessary measure to 'fill the black hole' etc etc.

I note the Government has now admitted its decision will push an additional 100,000 pensioners into poverty just as temperatures hit -5.
 
Tbh that's true of pretty much every single protest movement ever. It's natural that people to think that the thing that is most important to them is also important to others.
Personally I think this is going to be like VAT on private school fees, it won't affect very many, there is a larger but still small number that will get wound up about it thinking it will affect them whereas the majority might agree or disagree but since if won't effect them will just shrug indifferently. I'm in that group.

That's a very interesting point.

If we look at France, Macron's first skirmish in his attempt to roll back the state/impose cuts was with the farmers. From there what we saw was more and more groups take to the streets/strike/riot - not in support of the farmers per se - but in defence of their own position or over their own issues.

Reeves and Starmer aren't learning lessons from their attacks on pensioners and now farmers. They will maintain their resolute commitment to the rules and codes of elite liberalism and Reeve's willing absorbtion into Treasury orthodoxy (effectively a lament for the good old days of neo-liberalism and managed decline). There is already a startling level of unpopularity for a Government only elected in July.

That's before energy prices rise again. Before inflation starts to tick up again and before real terms spending cuts in departments are worked through.

It's therefore highly likely that yesterday is going to be repeated over and over again as more groups move into conflict with the Government.

Should the populist right be able to fuse it all together (which, is unlikely at present) then all bets are off. Before the election my prediction was that Starmer would be the PM who would usher in the type of populist right politics on the rise across Europe and the US as a direct response to a weak and clueless centrist elite collpased under the weight of events. Nothing I have seen to date contradicts that.
 
I know it doesn't actually affect that many farms, but if the main aim was to stop rich landowners using farmland as a tax loophole, surely it wouldn't be beyond the wit on man to exempt people who are actually farmers, or have below a certain annual income or something? So it won't touch people who are actual farmers who happen to be on valuable real estate.
 
They should examine the corpse to decide whether they were an actual farmer or a posh landowner

If the hands of the deceased are calloused, and there’s mud under the fingernails they can get an exemption, otherwise full inheritance tax is to be paid
 
Must admit I don't know the answer to this but if you live in a property that you inherit, do you have to pay inheritence tax? If not, the comparison with farmers situations is somewhat spurious.

It seems on the face of it quite unfair to tax working farmers who's assets are worth over the threshold. Assets used in the business. These aren't second homes you've inherited off aunty Dorris.

IF farmers do sell up and realise the appreciation of those assets, tax them with Capital gains.

Working farmland ending up on the books of multinationals who don't GaF about our food production sustainability or anything aside their shareholders is a bad idea. In fact I'd stop or severely restrict foreign businesses and individuals being able to buy property full stop.
 
Must admit I don't know the answer to this but if you live in a property that you inherit, do you have to pay inheritence tax? If not, the comparison with farmers situations is somewhat spurious.

It seems on the face of it quite unfair to tax working farmers who's assets are worth over the threshold. Assets used in the business. These aren't second homes you've inherited off aunty Dorris.

IF farmers do sell up and realise the appreciation of those assets, tax them with Capital gains.

Working farmland ending up on the books of multinationals who don't GaF about our food production sustainability or anything aside their shareholders is a bad idea. In fact I'd stop or severely restrict foreign businesses and individuals being able to buy property full stop.
And increase capital gains tax if necessary. That's pretty much the definition of unearned income - something you've lucked into for one reason or another. Hard to make a moral case against taxes on unearned income.

But it's not income, earned or unearned, until you sell.
 
Exactly. In the case of other types of business what happens. If the benneficeries intend to keep it running. Tried Googling this stuff but there are no quick answers. There's something called business relief.


As much as there may be some obnoxious very rich land owners, some of which may lease to farmers or farm themselves, this doesn't detract from the principle, which is wrong IMO.
 
Back
Top Bottom