Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine and the Russian invasion, 2022-25

You're making the schoolboy error of conflating the population of Ukraine with the zelensky government. Unless you've any of your actual evidence that the Ukrainian people desire cluster bombs scattered over their land by their government
Nope, I'm making an easy and cheap schoolboy level gag.

It should be easy for someone with your intellect to tell the difference,
 
See this is the kind of thing that pisses me off. I've been called a Stalinist, then 'morally weak' now 'morally superior'.

Make your fucking minds up.

I don't feel morally superior to anyone, never have done. What does concern me, amongst many obvious things like Russian imperialism, is the use of bombs rightly banned in over half the world but nodded through on here with only faux concern ('we'll be careful', and 'it will be fine') by people who I thought knew better.

I don't think it would take much to persuade some of you lot that other banned munitions were 'fine'. And that's disappointing.
My schoolboy level gag wasn't aimed at you to be fair, I'm not sure that you have tried to put yourself in a position of 'judgement' over the the Ukrainian people. Certainly I haven't seen you do it.
 
Last edited:
So my son plays on a beach, its all fine, is a fact you like, much better than those facts from the smug lefty Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor white feather wearing saps.
Thank god for facts from our resident six figure earning ministry of war spokesperson
Looking at the published pay bands I don't think he's getting six figures. Public sector pay has massively lagged recently,
 
The UK dropped a total of 106 cluster bombs on the Falklands, an area of the world with a population density that makes rural Ukraine look like Tokyo, spent years using the couple of garrisons it has hanging around there cleaning it up and there is still cluster contamination in the Falklands. So yes, that sounds easy, should have it all sorted in a jiffy.

Rather more nuanced than that - immediately post-war there was a big push to clear minefields (Argentine - who refused/where unable, to provide maps/locations of said minefields) and unexploded munitions from the areas around the population centres of Stanley, Darwin-Goose Green, Pebble Island and Fox Bay.

However, the UK then (84/5?)took the view that the Falklands population density meant that it could effectively tape off large areas (the beaches around Stanley being a prime example) and leave them uncleared because there was such huge amounts of land and beaches available that had been cleared.

The driver for that was simply that UK, both NGO and Mil, had a finite amount of de-mining capability, and that it was better that that capacity was used where it really mattered - Southern Africa, and then Bosnia and Kosovo - than to use it clear munitions from a beach on West Falkland that received a human visitor about once every 70 years.

Munitions clearance, apart from emergency stuff, didn't happen in the Falklands between about 1985 and well into the 2000's, simply because it wasn't necessary in order for the people who lived there to able to live safe lives.

Amusingly, for those who believe in the UN, the UK only started again because the UN (and hysterically, I think it was Argentina that made the complaint) honked off about the UK not meeting it's commitments to demine it's territory, so the UK reduced its efforts in places where it mattered to people, and started clearing up the Falklands instead.

Yorke bay is very nice, but....
 
It's so hard to tell when all your posts now when questioned turn out to be at best juvenile.
No, only about 90-95%. This figure has been fairly constant since I started on here. I do make the occasional pertinent and intelligent post. and some of my threads have been really interesting. But it's not really my thing on here . If you think differently it's probably because you are nostalgically imagining a past golden age when more of my posts were intelligent and pertinent that never really existed.
 
Last edited:
No, only about 90-95%. This figure has been fairly constant since I started on here. I do make the occasional pertinent and intelligent post. and some of my threads have been really interesting. But it's not really my thing on here . If you think differently it's because you are nostalgically imagining a past golden age when more of my posts were intelligent and pertinent that never really existed.
Anything intelligent and pertinent likely the product of random banging away
 
Rather more nuanced than that - immediately post-war there was a big push to clear minefields (Argentine - who refused/where unable, to provide maps/locations of said minefields) and unexploded munitions from the areas around the population centres of Stanley, Darwin-Goose Green, Pebble Island and Fox Bay.

However, the UK then (84/5?)took the view that the Falklands population density meant that it could effectively tape off large areas (the beaches around Stanley being a prime example) and leave them uncleared because there was such huge amounts of land and beaches available that had been cleared.

The driver for that was simply that UK, both NGO and Mil, had a finite amount of de-mining capability, and that it was better that that capacity was used where it really mattered - Southern Africa, and then Bosnia and Kosovo - than to use it clear munitions from a beach on West Falkland that received a human visitor about once every 70 years.

Munitions clearance, apart from emergency stuff, didn't happen in the Falklands between about 1985 and well into the 2000's, simply because it wasn't necessary in order for the people who lived there to able to live safe lives.

Amusingly, for those who believe in the UN, the UK only started again because the UN (and hysterically, I think it was Argentina that made the complaint) honked off about the UK not meeting it's commitments to demine it's territory, so the UK reduced its efforts in places where it mattered to people, and started clearing up the Falklands instead.

Yorke bay is very nice, but....

:( (((sheep)))

(and penguins)
 
This article on clearing cluster munitions makes an interesting read.





BiB is important in relation to Ukraine's planned use, as they will be able to map the areas where they use them, as the UK did in the Falklands. Their biggest problem is going to be clearing the ones that Russia has used in Ukraine, because Ukraine is not going to have as accurate information on where they have been used, plus the dud rate is claimed to be over 30% compared to about 2.5% for the ones the US are supplying, so a much more time consuming job.

Ukraine is going to be using the US supplied ones on the battlefields, these will be no-go areas for some years after the war, because of the sheer amount of cluster munitions already used, and thousands upon thousands of landmines, that need clearing. I am unconvinced a few more cluster munitions are going to play a massive role in the overall clear-up operation.

Whilst I am far from cheering on more cluster munitions being used, they don't seem likely to change the danger level on the actual ground by much, and if they are effective in breaking the Russian lines, and bringing forward the likely end to this bloody war, they will probably save a lot more lives, than they will take during the clearance years.

Have Ukraine been mapping out their use of cluster bombs in East Ukraine since 2014 and the ones that Turkey supplied last year ?
 
I hate to drag this off all the rigorous debate on the current topic but I have just started reading this after having it recommended to me, and it's a good read (so far) that covers some of the feelings and actions of people on the ground in the early days of the invasion and resistance.

"In fact, almost all of Voznesensk’s citizens worked against the invaders. Old ladies filled sandbags; men gathered hunting rifles and made molotov cocktails. These were useless against a tank, they acknowledged, but a symbol of defiance nonetheless. The town, led by a 32-year-old mayor, organised itself. The community was plucky and ready to improvise in dark times, like Ukrainian society as a whole."

 
Have you seen any indication this is even vaguely likely?
Yes. Without a massive influx of prepared troops and additional air support they won’t win. Ergo, throw more whatever into the maw.

I know the neck beard warrior types on here won’t be there.
 
Yes. Without a massive influx of prepared troops and additional air support they won’t win. Ergo, throw more whatever into the maw.

I know the neck beard warrior types on here won’t be there.

Sorry, you genuinely think we'll see NATO troops marching into Russia?
 
What’s your definition of winning?
You can’t win a fight. The costs are always potentially shit.

The Ukrainian forces are unlikely to punch through the Russian defences. Dream on about a coup or Putins ill health or Russian ammunition deficits.

The Ukrainians are throwing old men at the fight now. Ffs. Fuck their leadership.
 
My schoolboy level gag wasn't aimed at you to be fair, I'm not sure that you have tried to put yourself in a position of 'judgement' over the the Ukrainian people. Certainly I haven't seen you do it.
Hilariously you have repeatedly put yourself in a position of judgement over half the world.
 
You can’t win a fight. The costs are always potentially shit.

The Ukrainian forces are unlikely to punch through the Russian defences. Dream on about a coup or Putins ill health or Russian ammunition deficits.

The Ukrainians are throwing old men at the fight now. Ffs. Fuck their leadership.
No, fuck Russia for starting this, fuck Russia for murdering and raping civilians, fuck Russia for destroying hospitals, schools, homes and businesses and fuck Russia for their illegal occupation and endless list of war crimes.
 
You can’t win a fight. The costs are always potentially shit.

The Ukrainian forces are unlikely to punch through the Russian defences. Dream on about a coup or Putins ill health or Russian ammunition deficits.

The Ukrainians are throwing old men at the fight now. Ffs. Fuck their leadership.

Well if your definition of winning is to take Moscow and fly the flag over the Kremlin, you’re probably right. But they’re more likely to consider kicking Russia out of Ukraine, and ultimately joining NATO to make sure this doesn’t happen again, a win. And that’s achievable.
 
Have Ukraine been mapping out their use of cluster bombs in East Ukraine since 2014 and the ones that Turkey supplied last year ?

Dunno, but at the risk of being accused of armchair Generalism, I’d have thought that if you’re dropping bombs in your own country, some of which are certain to remain unexploded, keeping records of where you drop them would be covered in military planning 101.
 
I hate to drag this off all the rigorous debate on the current topic but I have just started reading this after having it recommended to me, and it's a good read (so far) that covers some of the feelings and actions of people on the ground in the early days of the invasion and resistance.

"In fact, almost all of Voznesensk’s citizens worked against the invaders. Old ladies filled sandbags; men gathered hunting rifles and made molotov cocktails. These were useless against a tank, they acknowledged, but a symbol of defiance nonetheless. The town, led by a 32-year-old mayor, organised itself. The community was plucky and ready to improvise in dark times, like Ukrainian society as a whole."

I read a short piece on the high level of civil activity and engagement ( as high as 80%) amongst w/class communities in some parts of Ukraine . Cant remember who wrote it unfortunately.
 
You can’t win a fight. The costs are always potentially shit.

The Ukrainian forces are unlikely to punch through the Russian defences. Dream on about a coup or Putins ill health or Russian ammunition deficits.

The Ukrainians are throwing old men at the fight now. Ffs. Fuck their leadership.

"Can't win a fight?" Didn't you and many others on here used to be involved in physical force antifascism? Plus like loads of wars and battles and strikes and movements that used force. WTF are you on about?

Whether you know it or not you're just then repeating Russian State propaganda, "throwing old men at the fight" and reducing a complex military operation over months that's part underway into a simple singular 'break through' that you somehow judge won't and can't happen.

You just forgot your line about one legged men being forced back to the front line.
 
Last edited:
I read a short piece on the high level of civil activity and engagement ( as high as 80%) amongst w/class communities in some parts of Ukraine . Cant remember who wrote it unfortunately.

Just spent 2 days with someone back from Ukraine (after 8 months there in civilian society) and they (while much more skeptical than I about things) said the level of support and engagement for the war felt almost universal. I mean anecdata but still.
 
Back
Top Bottom