Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine and the Russian invasion, 2022-25

Your solution to that desire for that protection was that the west didnt put enough weapons on the eastern border! A disastrous conclusion to make IMO.

So what is a way to have achieved a good outcome since 1989? Too complicated to put in a post by the likes of me, but it boils down to committed de-escalationary statecraft and diplomacy. To want that is a modest political aspiration I think. Europe's ruling political class has only one vision that they think comes close to that, and thats neoliberalism and interconnected economies. It is clearly way off the mark.

I think not invading Iraq might have gone some way to avoiding this. Also, not having idiotic economic advisers recommending shock therapy to Russia's economy might have helped. And perhaps allowing Russia to join NATO and some sort of EU membership roadmap might have helped.
 
It also looks like Turkey has genuinely closed the straits to Russia. The FT reports that a guided missile frigate was turned back yesterday.

That feels like a big development. What are the chances that Turkey sees this now as a rather convenient little arrangement? They have a war quite close to home that they can profitably sell tech into and use as a testing ground for their drones. And, conveniently, it involves rival interests, arguably, on both sides, who they can play off against each other.

Erdogan suddenly has an awful lot of cards to play.
 
It also looks like Turkey has genuinely closed the straits to Russia. The FT reports that a guided missile frigate was turned back yesterday.

That feels like a big development. What are the chances that Turkey sees this now as a rather convenient little arrangement? They have a war quite close to home that they can profitably sell tech into and use as a testing ground for their drones. And, conveniently, it involves rival interests, arguably, on both sides, who they can play off against each other.

Erdogan suddenly has an awful lot of cards to play.
you're again behind the times Turkey closes the Dardanelles and Bosphorus to warships - Naval News. the straits have closed to all warships so in a way that's a nice result for russia: no nato ships entering the black sea. indeed, the only warships that can enter (bar other ships returning to base) are russian or turkish.
 
I'm wondering how he sells Chelsea (an asset) if his assets are frozen, at (obvs) what the swerve is.
Many of the sanctions cut in after 30 days to give the opportunity for sanctioned businesses to wind down (sell assets and move funds abroad).


The loophole applies to many sanctioned businesses, but that particular article is mostly about VTB bank, which coincidentally is a Tory party donor.

 
stfu about things of which you know nothing. there was no doubt, the mc is quite clear.
View attachment 312653

Yes, but what is a war and who determines it?

You lack the subtlety for this kind of reasoning, it seems.
 
Yes, but what is a war and who determines it?

You lack the subtlety for this kind of reasoning, it seems.
there is no need for reasoning here. this isn't some abstruse legal problem, the wartime clauses have been invoked (whatever you think of them, whatever your view of what constitutes a war, and no matter who you think should have invoked them) and hence the only warships that can enter the black sea are those returning to their home ports and of course turkish ships. no rn, no usn, no french navy etc etc. so russian ships based in the black sea can go back to the crimea.
 
It needs a list of addresses circulated, followed by a general "squat the lot" announcement. So, if anyone has access to land registry info and can cross-reference it with the names of Russian oligarchs, we're on :thumbs:
Didn't Private Eye do an investigation, and handy interactive map, of British property owned by shady shell companies and the like. That might be a good place to start (although you might well have to do a lot of trawling through company house's website, and cross-referencing to find out who actually owns it)

Ahh yes. Private Eye Magazine | Official Site - the UK's number one best-selling news and current affairs magazine, edited by Ian Hislop it's only from 2004 to 2014, so it's out of date, sadly.
 
Little stroll in uncanny valley. Question is will they put him back in at some point.

Well, there won't be much urgency to melt him down, given that a statue of the diminutive Vova isn't going to yield that much wax, and won't take all that much space up anyway. :)
 
Hopefully a few of this lot are already under the rubble.

 
I take it this was directed at me. If so it is a strawman mischaracterisation - and one that smacks of the appeaser finger pointing variety.
I'm upset by a lot of pro-war sentiment that i think (sometimes subtly, sometimes blatantly) underlies much public, press and political opinion, including on urban, and so i've posted much more on this subject than i would like, its painful to type it in all honesty, but i've tried to set out a nuanced view, and if you're taking it as me blaming nato on everything i dont know why i bother. Either im not being clear enough, or maybe its just easier to reach for that appeaser view.
You are doing fine ska. The jingoism both here on urban and certainly in the uk press rather reminds me of the Falklands War.
 
Hopefully a few of this lot are already under the rubble.

Ah yes, that's the thing about rubble, it's perfectly focused and just hits the baddies. Whoosh, a block of flats, just wipes out the fash!
 
Ah yes, that's the thing about rubble, it's perfectly focused and just hits the baddies. Whoosh, a block of flats, just wipes out the fash!
Well seeing as it's happening anyway, might as well hope.
 
Ah yes, that's the thing about rubble, it's perfectly focused and just hits the baddies. Whoosh, a block of flats, just wipes out the fash!
yeh but not just any block of flats, the trick is to make sure there are fash inside. of course you can do it more simply by just knocking down all the blocks. but that's cheating.
 
You are doing fine ska. The jingoism both here on urban and certainly in the uk press rather reminds me of the Falklands War.
That's just so wide of the mark. History is history - we know the history - but this is what it is, a decision by Putin to attack the people of Ukraine. I stand with those people and I stand with the poor sods putin has sent in to bolster his regime. I don't want the Russians killed, I'd rather they got mired down with their supply problems and fucked off home. Don't think that's going to happen, they are going to carry on and end up getting a protracted and bloody victory. Fuck Nato, fuck putin, but this is about the Ukranian people getting shelled and forced to flee from their homes and country.
 
the war also has similarities with is Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1990. Iraqs army at the time was - reportedly - the third/fourth biggest in the world. but it was mostly ill equipped, poor trained conscripts who were close to useless once the US and Co piled in. The promised "mother of all battles" was turned into a turkey shoot . Saddam clearly thought it would be a fati-compli and the amercans would not dare to tackle him - but Saddam's Iraq was turend into a pariah state and sanctioned to fuck - then finally disposed of in 2003.
Here again it looks like the capabilities of the Russian military has been overestimated and Putin had not expected such a fierce reaction from the rest of the world. Once the war is over his regime will be a pariah state - like saddam's Iraq or north korea - only one still with a powerful military and defiantly with a fuck ton of WMDs- all under the control of a saddam style brutal megalomaniac. Regime change in russia is going to be number 1 priority for US and European foreign policy - and possibly china (and anyone else who doesn't want a real life bond villain running around with the capacity to end life on earth).

Anyway - sleep well ....
 
the war also has similarities with is Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1990. Iraqs army at the time was - reportedly - the third/fourth biggest in the world. but it was mostly ill equipped, poor trained conscripts who were close to useless once the US and Co piled in. The promised "mother of all battles" was turned into a turkey shoot . Saddam clearly thought it would be a fati-compli and the amercans would not dare to tackle him - but Saddam's Iraq was turend into a pariah state and sanctioned to fuck - then finally disposed of in 2003.
Here again it looks like the capabilities of the Russian military has been overestimated and Putin had not expected such a fierce reaction from the rest of the world. Once the war is over his regime will be a pariah state - like saddam's Iraq or north korea - only one still with a powerful military and defiantly with a fuck ton of WMDs- all under the control of a saddam style brutal megalomaniac. Regime change in russia is going to be number 1 priority for US and European foreign policy - and possibly china (and anyone else who doesn't want a real life bond villain running around with the capacity to end life on earth).

Anyway - sleep well ....
have you ever noticed how well mannered bond villains are, and how generous with their time to explain just how the elaborate way they're going to kill 007 works?
 
Back
Top Bottom