Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukip - why are they gaining support?

That's from 2006 and clearly just an amatuer local branch job. Don't think you'll be seeing anything like that again - certainly not before may. This was the going nowhere party that you joined wasn't it gosub? Rather than the doing well one they have now?
Nope, HAVE STILL NEVER JOIN UKIP, worked with Referendum party and advocated (and forgot) voting for them once after the consitution without referendum debacle.
 
I think being in EFTA rather than the EU, as UKIP want, will make little difference economically; politically is a wholly different matter. For instance, England would not be able to block an independent Scotland's entry to the EU.
 
The Guardian decide to waffle on about UKIP in places such as Great Yarmouth and Skegness. I don't think there are any surprises here but I suppose it touches on a few relevant issues and sheepishly acknowledges that this is another part of the country often ignored in journalists pictures. Lays the bleak flatness and isolation on a bit thick though, groan, oh well it gave the northern cliche's a rest for once by having eastern ones take charge instead. And then looks at some of the local UKIP characters, splits and controversies, in the typical style.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics...le-england-east-anglia-lincolnshire-elections
 
Anyone seen a worse anti-ukip poster?

BkICj6VCYAAcQ-y.jpg:large
 
There is a story in the local paper where an alleged rape victim cannot bring her case to court because the cops lost the video evidence. They have paid her £7.5k compensation which, according to the story, is payable because of ECHR legislation.

How would UKIP have protected her rights. I think we all know the answer given they want out of the convention.

They don't comment on issues like this and rely on some implicit notion of 'british fair play' and the conventions of cricket.
 
There is a story in the local paper where an alleged rape victim cannot bring her case to court because the cops lost the video evidence. They have paid her £7.5k compensation which, according to the story, is payable because of ECHR legislation.

How would UKIP have protected her rights. I think we all know the answer given they want out of the convention.

They don't comment on issues like this and rely on some implicit notion of 'british fair play' and the conventions of cricket.

And that local paper is attacking the award of the compensation and the ECHR, rather than attacking the cops for incompetence?

Or have I got this wrong?
 
No it's just reporting it. The UKIP angle is mine, inspired by listening to them whining on local radio ahead of the MEP elections next month.
 
Back
Top Bottom