Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukip - why are they gaining support?

Did i hear right from that clip - this woman had some say (professional or as a result of being elected - doesn't matter) in the allocation of supported housing (or employment in same) for young adults and was dispensing on the basis of her dislike of 'negroid features'?
 
Did i hear right from that clip - this woman had some say (professional or as a result of being elected - doesn't matter) in the allocation of supported housing (or employment in same) for young adults and was dispensing on the basis of her dislike of 'negroid features'?

i fucking hope not.

ime that say is down to officers though, not elected members.
 
she (clown woman) should have got the boot too, a press officer that didn't stop the interview or even tell anyone BBC now had some footage that might prove damaging.

And bought into the bullshit idea that its language thats a problem rather than underlying attitude, but then quite a lot of people do sadly:(
 
Quite. Now I've seen the documentary I've realised she wasn't just the doggy-sitter.
the Press officer no less, who had told everyone to be careful with what they said in public and then didn't challenge her racist friend when she did it in front of the cameras and avoided her at their Christmas do, where they had a lovely inspiring speech from ex bnp chairman

you couldn't make it up!
 
Did i hear right from that clip - this woman had some say (professional or as a result of being elected - doesn't matter) in the allocation of supported housing (or employment in same) for young adults and was dispensing on the basis of her dislike of 'negroid features'?

Think she seems to be talking about something in the late '80's, and I'm not sure if she was involved in the scheme or just recanting a conversation she had with someone who was.
 
i fucking hope not.

ime that say is down to officers though, not elected members.
she might have sat on an allocations committee - but councillors tend to not get involved with day to day stuff - and usually understand that we can't change procedures on their say so.
 
Think she seems to be talking about something in the late '80's, and I'm not sure if she was involved in the scheme or just recanting a conversation she had with someone who was.
From what i can tell someone involved in the scheme asked her if she felt there were any people supported accommodation would not be relevant to. And she replied with her racist stuff. Why would she be asked if not in some position of authority or influence though? This might not have even been to do with the council either - she might have worked there. She may not have been a cllr at the time. Needs checking out i think.
 
From what i can tell someone involved in the scheme asked her if she felt there were any people supported accommodation would not be relevant to. And she replied with her racist stuff. Why would she be asked if not in some position of authority or influence though?

i need to listen to the clip really (am at work atm)

as marty21 says Councillors/Members can have roles in steering policy etc. but really that kind of shit would/should just be ignored (at worst, fucking reported at best!)

eta - sorry, replied to the wrong post, was trying to reply to the one with the clip times in
 
I did work for a TMO years ago (Tenant Management Organisation) and we had a London Cabbie on the allocations committee - they insisted on interviewing the viewers for our available properties - and did sometimes say no - if they 'didn't like the look of them' . Their argument at the time was that they wanted to ensure that the estate was kept free from trouble:hmm: I was a temp there at the time - did mention this to the manager but they weren't arsed, just shrugged their shoulders and said there was nothing they could do about it
 
Channel 4’s spoof docudrama about Ukip is to be investigated by the media watchdog after it sparked more than 6,500 complaints.

The programme, Ukip: the first 100 Days, imagined Nigel Farage as prime minister and used actors alongside real-life documentary footage.

It prompted 5,262 complaints to Ofcom and a further 1,300 complaints to Channel 4.

Ofcom said on Monday it had launched an official investigation into the show. It will look to see if the programme breached the broadcasting code on three separate counts: whether it was offensive, misleading, and on issues around due impartiality.

One area the regulator is believed to be looking at is the use of archive footage of Ukip supporters applauding which was then intercut with speeches by fictional Ukip politicians.

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/feb/23/ukip-docudrama-complaints-channel-4-ofcom

Although the BBC doc showed some home truths, that is a bit dodgy.
 
she (clown woman) should have got the boot too, a press officer that didn't stop the interview or even tell anyone BBC now had some footage that might prove damaging.

And bought into the bullshit idea that its language thats a problem rather than underlying attitude, but then quite a lot of people do sadly:(
She reminded me of a Poundland Sybil Fawlty.
 
I loved when Mr Farage explained before x date (in run up to the EUro elections) very few people thought UKIP were racist, then loads of people did, and attributed this change to the media..... Not the rather nasty billboards UKIP put up and down the country.
Those pesky Bolshevik tabloids. Other nuggets included the couple that were fed up with the "London centric parties" while putting on his City of London cufflinks. They clearly didn't regard decent chaps in the City as 'London centric' which I assume is UKIP PC language for foreigners, liberals, book readers, woofters, darkies etc. Basically anyone who's not them such as Bulgarians who have the audacity to stand around in Thanet and speak foreign.

And their attempts to capture the animal welfare vote by standing up against exporting meat to horse hungry Frogs was pure comedy gold. It all begs the questions as to what are the Kippers they didn't want to put up for the documentary like.

She's the kind of person who would complain "Well, why can't I call a black person a n*gger? They use it all the time to each other". :facepalm:
Or "I don't care if they're black, blue, purple or whatever"
 
Last edited:
Those pesky Bolshevik tabloids. Other nuggets included the couple that were fed up with the "London centric parties" while putting on his City of London cufflinks. They clearly didn't regard decent chaps in the City as 'London centric' which I assume is UKIP PC language for foreigners, liberals, book readers, woofters, darkies etc. Basically anyone who's not them such as Bulgarians who have the audacity to stand around in Thanet and speak foreign.

And their attempts to capture the animal welfare vote by standing up against exporting meat to horse hungry Frogs was pure comedy gold. It all begs the questions as to what are the Kippers they didn't want to put up for the documentary like.


Or "I don't care if they're black, blue, purple or whatever"
funnily enough, I've had arguments on Google + with kippers (they seem to love it there) one claimed they won the Reckless by election because they pledged to preserve a bird sanctuary - (threatened with closure due to a planned development of 5000 new homes) big lol
 
funnily enough, I've had arguments on Google + with kippers (they seem to love it there) one claimed they won the Reckless by election because they pledged to preserve a bird sanctuary - (threatened with closure due to a planned development of 5000 new homes) big lol

Was an issue iirc, Tories put out literature saying you couldn't trust Reckless coz he had been in favour of the development when he was a Tory. (would hazard a guess the developer was a tory)
 
Watching now on iPlayer, was struck by Martyn "I was only in the NF for a year" Heale and his belief that UKIP would be successful because they were the underdogs. Obviously lots of minor parties have gained massively in the last few years and he's not wrong - but what does he think will happen if they ever weren't the underdog?

Also had cause to wonder what's worse; being in the Tories for 22 years or the NF for 14 months...
 
Was an issue iirc, Tories put out literature saying you couldn't trust Reckless coz he had been in favour of the development when he was a Tory. (would hazard a guess the developer was a tory)
it was an issue - but not a crucial one I'd say - Europe , giving the Tories a kicking, and Immigration would have trumped anything else
 
Back
Top Bottom