brogdale
Coming to terms with late onset Anarchism
how convenient.
how convenient.
Not had time to go through the data tables but they usually take 2010 vote/non-vote into account.Something that seems to be missing there is any idea of how many previously-not-voters are now intending to vote UKIP (or whatever).
I don't think I've seen that being measured anywhere (though I might have missed it) and I'm wondering if it's potentially significant in confirming that support for UKIP is more about protest or rejection of the established parties than explicit with the UKIP position (assuming we can completely seperate the two, which is probably not possible).
Not had time to go through the data tables but they usually take 2010 vote/non-vote into account.
Can't recall off top of head, i suspect (given the research Goodwin etc have done identifying UKIP supporters) there is support amongst alienated previous non-voters - the sort of people who the BNP were making inroads into 6 or 7 years back. In the BNP's case it mean they had some room to grow without having to directly win votes from the other parties to drop (but that was always limited due to their history etc). I think UKIP have very probably eaten up all that possible non-voting support now and so are going to have to win actual voters from other parties.OK, I'm not asking you to spoon feed me - I haven't seen it before, but I'm happy to accept that I've missed it.
So is there (assuming you can remember without going through your database) any evidence to suggest that previous non-voters are more likely to now support UKIP than other parties, taking into account the relative size of support of those other parties?
Can't recall off top of head, i suspect (given the research Goodwin etc have done identifying UKIP supporters) there is support amongst alienated previous non-voters - the sort of people who the BNP were making inroads into 6 or 7 years back. In the BNP's case it mean they had some room to grow without having to directly win votes from the other parties to drop (but that was always limited due to their history etc). I think UKIP have very probably eaten up all that possible non-voting support now and so are going to have to win actual voters from other parties.
this sounds like an unlikely story - who?
I've no idea, the dockers started shouting as he drove past and shouted scab, one of them saying how he was one of the 47.
Why do you think it's odd that she's a Christian?
She was Chair of the national exec of the party, that's pretty important, more so than being a councillor.
Chairing the NEC hasn't had much kudos (or power) since new Labour turned the NEC into purely a rubber-stamping exercise for party policy back during Blair's first term.
Anthony @YG expresses some surprise that Ashcroft chose to include NE Cambs in the list of marginals...4 new tory held UKIP target seats polled by ashcroft (i'll check what # in the target seats they are in a sec):
North East Cambridgeshire seems like a rather odd choice to begin with, it doesn’t look like an obvious place for UKIP success and while Ashcroft doesid find UKIP in second place, the poll gives the Conservatives a very solid 21 point lead. (detailled tabs)
Rozanne Duncan was still digging herself a hole on Twitter earlier. At this rate, they'll be hiring her for the next major tunnelling project.
Ironically, its Channel 4 thats saved UKIP's arse today, with the Dispatches story on Straw and Rifkind getting the media attention.
Less ironic when you consider it was a joint sting with the Daily Telegraph, although their loyalty to the tory flag doesn't make them the biggest fans of UKIP.
Having this and the fictional C4 '100 days of UKIP' running in within a few days isn't exactly going to quash the narrative of a liberal media/establishment plot to stitch up UKIP, a paranoia that they feed off very nicely. This allows the party to portray any scandal or exposure as a stitch-up and present themselves as the victims. It's useful to them.