thats exactly right
the people losing out on work here are the person answering the phones and the boss of the local cab office, who basically makes money off the back of the drivers
I'm not sure why it's better for the smaller amount of Zuckerbergoid parasites who created and run Uber to be the ones making money off the backs of the drivers instead, but maybe I've yet to grasp the revolutionary significance of global internet companies.
I wouldn't be so quick to lump the people on the phones in the same category as the bosses - are retail workers profiting off the backs of farm and factory workers?
however, the drivers themselves - from what i gather - are happy - they come away with more money in their pocket and more work flexibility - so the vast majority of the workers involved in mincabbing - namely the minicab drivers - are happy about it.
The people who strike are from the more expensive city cab offices - like the black cabs.
Thats my understanding of it.
I predict that they'll be less happy about such arrangements when they become the norm and companies like Uber have them by the balls, and start squeezing.
I definitely cant afford to get in a black cab - unless theres 4 people i can maybe get in a minicab - uber makes cabs vaguely affordable
London does have really high cab fare costs though - many other cities in the world have much much lower.
I've never used black cabs; even if the per-unit cost was not an issue, the fact their pricing model is based on units of time rather than distance makes them irrelevant because a mere traffic jam would put me out of pocket. I've only ever used minicabs and while I wouldn't use them regularly, compared to trains or buses, they've not been prohibitively expensive on the occasions I've used them.
And as to automation and driverless cars - we'll see it in our lifetime im sure.
i can get with this slogan:
I'm sure that increased automation and such will be a thing in my lifetime, but it seems that unlike you I realise that within spaces where capitalism exists as the dominant force, such things will be introduced and structured on
their terms, not ours. If the universal basic income becomes a thing, then I would expect it to be enacted for the same reasons that the welfare state was established - something done not out of the goodness of the boss's hearts, but as a sop to preclude full-scale revolution and preserve their own social position.