Same here.The reason that I enjoy the paedophile chant at Wenger is that it's so manifestly unfounded an accusation. Purity of malice is untainted by any coarse fact.
Same here.
Either it's clearly a load of baws, or the outrage is somewhat misplaced in defence of a child-molester.
Despite both being 'untainted by etc', the distinction between the Le Saux thing and Wenger is that one is obviously so. It's perfectly possible that Le Saux was gay, married and kids or not*.Which is fine, but in John Fashanu's case it was for being gay - with the implication that being gay was something hateful. Le Saux got the same, partly because he's a bit pompous and it clearly riled him - even though it's 'untainted by any coarse fact' it's still distasteful in the extreme.
I appreciate I've chosen perhaps the clearest cut of all, but the distinction is surely clear - there is inherent discrimination in society, and mocking footballers according to these prejudices is clearly objectionable.
Despite both being 'untainted by etc', the distinction between the Le Saux thing and Wenger is that one is obviously so. It's perfectly possible that Le Saux was gay, married and kids or not*.
*I don't believe him to be, but that's not the point.
Sorry, I've lost you then. Probably my fault, my head's a mess this evening.Again, this is not in reference to Wenger.
I also noticed (the things you do in international weeks) we have 87 players on the books: