Ok. So is inflation caused by people putting up their prices but only if the people putting up their prices are capitalists?No, because they're not capitalists.
Well this was unexpected
BBC has this freeze frame of Truss on their frontpage ATM.
I can see some Munch photoshops appearing soon.
View attachment 334604
Ok. So is inflation caused by people putting up their prices but only if the people putting up their prices are capitalists?
So basically he has a PHD in a meaningless subject.Economics is so much more interesting than people would like it to be.
Someone with an economics phd who i asked about Sunak's claim that tax cuts = inevitable inflation said this;
"either you can make a model that looks like reality, but it's so complicated that you can't learn anything from it, or you can make a model that's simple enough to learn from, but then it doesn't behave like reality".
I think mostly we choose simple, not caring about how it maps onto reality.
Workers get to raise the price of their labour in various circumstances.Well workers don't generally get to dictate the price of their labour so yeah.
BBC has this freeze frame of Truss on their frontpage ATM.
I can see some Munch photoshops appearing soon.
View attachment 334604
yep. if i could study a thing now it would be economics, so much more esoteric than say the kabalah (seriously i would).So basically he has a PHD in a meaningless subject.
Like when they take collective action to reduce the level of exploration.Workers get to raise the price of their labour in various circumstances.
For example. Yes.Like when they take collective action to reduce the level of exploration.
Workers get to raise the price of their labour in various circumstances.
So basically he has a PHD in a meaningless subject.
These potato farmers, they are capitalists right?the way a capitalist can unilaterally raise prices from one day to the next?
Firstly, a self employed plumber (for example) can raise their prices in a period of high demand.But, aside from freelance management consultants and other people who don't count as workers because they don't do any work, can they unilaterally raise their own pay from one day to the next, the way a capitalist can unilaterally raise prices from one day to the next? No. If they fight tooth and nail, alongside lots of other workers and a decent union, for months or years then they might just claw their way up to parity with the rate of inflation.
its not long winded! it just says we do not know, economics is complicated, if you want a simple story pick one and enjoy it but don't expect it to reflect reality, that's all.But he's found a long-winded way of saying it and that's the important thing.
its not long winded! it just says we do not know, if you want a simple story pick one but don't expect it to reflect reality.
There's pretty much a whole field of study which is about trying to understand complicated systems via simplified models, because it simply isn't possible to model them in full. Naturally it involves fully understanding the limits of the models you do have and making judgements about the extent of their reliability when drawing conclusions from them. It's not like simplified or incomplete models are necessarily useless.its not long winded! it just says we do not know, economics is complicated, if you want a simple story pick one and enjoy it but don't expect it to reflect reality, that's all.
Economics is so much more interesting than people would like it to be.
Someone with an economics phd who i asked about Sunak's claim that tax cuts = inevitable inflation said this;
"either you can make a model that looks like reality, but it's so complicated that you can't learn anything from it, or you can make a model that's simple enough to learn from, but then it doesn't behave like reality".
I think mostly we choose simple, not caring about how it maps onto reality.
Secondly, I don't see how a capitalist can "unilaterally" raise prices from one day to the next because if they raise them too high no-one will pay them, unless they are in the special position of having a monopoly.
I think economics has more in common with religion than science. Other than on the most basic self evident transactional trueisms. i.e. you have potatoes I'm hungry and have gold.
absolutely, it seems to be at least 3/4s about the psychological issues of the human animal observed in large numbers. The stock exchange loved trump, for instance, and people buy NFTs instead of tinned mackerel, its not any kind of science it belongs in a prefab bolted onto the anthropology department if anywhere.I think economics has more in common with religion than science. Other than on the most basic self evident transactional trueisms. i.e. you have potatoes I'm hungry and have gold.
As you said, you might not be the best person to come to for basic thinking demonstrations.My mate has been boycotting food on account of the price hikes. Dunno how he's getting on with it though, because he's gone a bit quiet lately for some reason.
Isn't it always? Irrespective of candidate or party?yep but like her mentor johnson, its just about saying what the current audience right now wants to hear.