Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Tory Leadership contest 2022

We have a shoddy democracy. Whether you define that by being governed by someone elected by 200,000 gammons that gather in golf club bars, or free for all lobbying, FPTP, an unelected upper house, uncontrolled party funding, or one of dozens of other corrupt mechanisms. Nobody who can fix it wants to do so.

How do you think parties should choose their leader? Or more broadly, what system of democracy wouldn't have such flaws?
 
They probably didn't put in on their website because there wasn't a need to as it didn't go viral on Twitter yet. I expect they will update it in due course.

But the site clearly states 'You do not have to be a voter or a UK citizen', and you're saying the opposite, so surely you must have a source, or did you just make it?
 
But the site clearly states 'You do not have to be a voter or a UK citizen', and you're saying the opposite, so surely you must have a source, or did you just make it?

No, that statement in bold accords with what I said, that you need to have previously been a UK resident and eligible to vote here. My source is a Tory party member.
 
But the site clearly states 'You do not have to be a voter or a UK citizen', and you're saying the opposite, so surely you must have a source, or did you just make it?
Isn't party subscription a political donation? If so it'd be covered by this:


A permissible source is:

an individual registered on a UK electoral register, including overseas electors and those leaving bequests
 
In the absence of hard evidence, I’m more inclined to believe that those drawing up the vote on leadership aren’t making elementary school level errors about eligibility.
 
The contest will be remembered as the one where everyone competed to do the best Margaret Thatcher impression and Liz Truss won.
 
The contest will be remembered as the one where everyone competed to do the best Margaret Thatcher impression and Liz Truss won.

my option at this stage would be to issue the 2 remaining candidates with the below

maggie1.jpg


and then let them fight to the death to pick the next leader
 
How do you think parties should choose their leader? Or more broadly, what system of democracy wouldn't have such flaws?
A system with some form of PR would have far fewer of these flaws. Given that no single party ever gets close to 50% of the vote in the UK, such a system would ensure that all governments are coalitions of some kind. You wouldn't have this situation under such circumstances as the coalition partners could pull the plug and trigger a general election.
 
A system with some form of PR would have far fewer of these flaws. Given that no single party ever gets close to 50% of the vote in the UK, such a system would ensure that all governments are coalitions of some kind. You wouldn't have this situation under such circumstances as the coalition partners could pull the plug and trigger a general election.

I’m sure I could create a list of flaws for e.g. the system in Germany that is just as long. Many PR countries often take months and sometimes years to form a government following a general election for example.
 
I just went to the land of the Swiss and for all it’s many ridiculousnesses, the fact that nobody knows the name of any of the 7 people who together approximate the role of PM seems pretty good to me atm.
 
Did you come here looking for an argument?

BTW, I'm not OK with bullying but haven't seen it on this thread. If (which I somehow doubt) you're a very sensitive person this might not be the most hospitable forum.
Cat Fan. Look it up

I don’t know him/her but they got roasted on here for their opinion.

I’m not sensitive. If your idea of sensitive is “oh you don’t understand the vibe here”, then respectfully…screw you, because you’re defending grown men intimidating women.
 
Cat Fan. Look it up

I don’t know him/her but they got roasted on here for their opinion.

I’m not sensitive. If your idea of sensitive is “oh you don’t understand the vibe here”, then respectfully…screw you, because you’re defending grown men intimidating women.
Eh? I had a quick look and don't know what you're talking about. Can you point to a particular conversation? :confused:
Also, FWIW, had no idea Cat Fan was a woman.

This whole exchange is baffling.
 
Eh? I had a quick look and don't know what you're talking about. Can you point to a particular conversation? :confused:
Also, FWIW, had no idea Cat Fan was a woman.

This whole exchange is baffling.
Look it up yourself. I’m just telling you the individuals involved are bully’s. I think you probably know that yourself, but because they’re forum royalty no-one complains. I don’t know or care who they are, so I’m very happy to call them what they are.

Is this the 5 minute argument or the full half hour?

Don’t give me that you snotty faced heap of parrot droppings.
 
Look it up yourself. I’m just telling you the individuals involved are bully’s. I think you probably know that yourself, but because they’re forum royalty no-one complains. I don’t know or care who they are, so I’m very happy to call them what they are.



Don’t give me that you snotty faced heap of parrot droppings.
Did you not read my post? I couldn't find the bullying you're complaining about.
There is a Report button if you see something inappropriate.
 
Back
Top Bottom