Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Tory Leadership contest 2022

Have checked, the party they vote for was accused of using scab labour but nowhere was the poster called scab.

As for scum, that was aimed at the Tories. Again, the poster in question was not called scum.

The plot thickens and predictably unravels.
It’s just another example of a poster struggling with finding out that their political beliefs aren’t as “nice” as they had assumed. An attack on their belief (eg “the Green Party can be an agent of capital”, or “the Labour Party are not left wing”) is thereby interpreted as an attack on their person, since it is, in effect, a suggestion that they also are not “nice”. Psychological defences then kick in to protect their psyche from this cognitive dissonance. In this case, the resulting self-hate is projected outwards to the “attacking” party. In a word, they are butthurt.
 
Last edited:
It’s just another example of a poster struggling with finding out that their political beliefs aren’t as “nice” as they had assumed. The attack on their belief (eg that the Green Party can be an agent of capital, or that the Labour Party are not left wing) is thereby interpreted as an attack on their person, since it is, in effect, a suggestion that they also are not “nice”. Psychological defences then kick in to protect their psyche from this cognitive dissonance. In this case, the resulting self-hate is projected outwards to the “attacking” party. In a word, they are butthurt.
Yep, loads of wanker cunts in the GP
 
Don't know if anyone has been bored enough to do this, but the comments under a lot of the pro-Truss articles in the Mail do suggest she might not be as popular amongst the "grassroots" as claimed.
 
Russian bot farms running scared of her iron resolve?

Probably not, the "most popular" posts all seem to be long-established contributors. It also helps that what is being put out is manifestly absurd, eg:

‘There were 364 economists that objected to Mrs Thatcher’s plan, and what we are doing at the moment, the economic policy at the moment is not delivering the economic growth we need, and what people voted for across this country in 2016 when they voted Brexit and in 2019 when they voted for Boris, is they voted for change, they voted for us to do things differently, they wanted to see more enterprise, more opportunities.

‘People who voted Conservative for the first time in places like Teesside or West Yorkshire or across the North of England, they were voting for something different, not the same policy that had delivered low growth for 20 years.’

:facepalm:
 
Don't know if anyone has been bored enough to do this, but the comments under a lot of the pro-Truss articles in the Mail do suggest she might not be as popular amongst the "grassroots" as claimed.
Do Tory members, rather than voters, read the Mail? The Telegraph, The Times and perhaps the FT seem more likely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ax^
No. He/she/they admitted they felt bullied though. By you amongst others. I repeat my earlier question: are you OK with bullying?
Pls name the post you're referring to. E2a cat fan refers to me once in this thread and does not say what you say they said. As krtek a houby says you're a liar, tho you can redeem that reputation by apologising for your mistake here
 
Pls name the post you're referring to. E2a cat fan refers to me once in this thread and does not say what you say they said. As krtek a houby says you're a liar, tho you can redeem that reputation by apologising for your mistake here

No. Do your own research.

Cat Fan mentioned several times in this thread that they felt bullied and harassed from the replies they were getting.

Cat Fan also said they have anxiety issues which might prevent them from standing up for themselves.

You were one of the contributors.

Just apologise directly to Cat Fan and we can all move on.
 
Back
Top Bottom