danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
YouGov guy says: "we just don't know".Any chance of a precis? Am at work and they don't like streaming media
YouGov guy says: "we just don't know".Any chance of a precis? Am at work and they don't like streaming media
Maybe that it's undecideds who have opted to go the take it to the polling station route.
Scottish independence: 'It's all going hell for leather' – video
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...tish-independence-political-reformation-video
Fuck it, you bastards better vote Yes as the party won't be one to be missed.
If it was a triumph of democracy how come no popular input or participation into what questions were asked was allowed?We'll have a party either way; why let all that preparation go to waste? Besides, whichever side wins, it will be a triumph of democracy. It's just a pity that Friday isn't a public holiday.
Did I mention that I'm just back from France with a large quantity of Champagne?
To represent the voting population for the specific vote. Maybe these prefesionals didn't bother to think about that. How would you weight them btw - on what basis? Given they are at best 1.5% of the vote and shown to be split/ pro NO slightly, i don't see it mattering anyway.How do they select their samples - are they weighted to reflect people newly on the electoral register for this vote?
1.5%?? It's a lot higher than that, it's not just the 16/17 year olds, or even they under 21s (new to the role since the 2001 holyrood election), it's the.... God knows how many, who never bothered to register before cos parliamentary elections are shite. I'd have thought they be more likely to be Yes'sTo represent the voting population for the specific vote. Maybe these prefesionals didn't bother to think about that. How would you weight them btw - on what basis? Given they are at best 1.5% of the vote and shown to be split/ pro NO slightly, i don't see it mattering anyway.
Sorry - i thought a8 asked about 16-18 year olds. Not all those new to the register.1.5%?? It's a lot higher than that, it's not just the 16/17 year olds, or even they under 21s (new to the role since the 2001 holyrood election), it's the.... God knows how many, who never bothered to register before cos parliamentary elections are shite. I'd have thought they be more likely to be Yes's
He might have been (tho I'd have still thought they were more likely to be Yes's, I haven't seen any age related breakdowns for ages), but it's the other ones who are more interesting, imo.Sorry - i thought a8 asked about 16-18 year olds. Not all those new to the register.
That's an extra 300 000 voters since the GE if that 4.1 million fig is correct.Isn't voter registration way north of 90%? There were 4.1 million registered to vote last time I looked, that's most of the eligible population.
I expected the same but checked it out and posted the results on here a month or so back. Yes, it's this last block who are making me thing YES are still well in this.He might have been (tho I'd have still thought they were more likely to be Yes's, I haven't seen any age related breakdowns for ages), but it's the other ones who are more interesting, imo.
That's an extra 300 000 voters since the GE if that 4.1 million fig is correct.
Just to clarify - registration now is around 4.45 million. So 300 000 more since then.Astonishingly, that was apparently 6 months ago. Wow, hadn't realised that.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-26845094
More people can register to vote yes. But that, on its own, doesn't increase the % registered.The increase in electorate is in part due to the reduced voting age, isn't it?
what's the turnout gonna be? pretty high I'd have thought?
what's the turnout gonna be? pretty high I'd have thought?
80% +what's the turnout gonna be? pretty high I'd have thought?
The total percentage that can register remains 100.The increase in electorate is in part due to the reduced voting age, isn't it?
1951. Means nothing on its own unless you want to endorse this great democracy of ours and how things would only be better if people engaged blah blahwhen did you ever see something of that level turnout for a GE?
1951. Means nothing on its own unless you want to endorse this great democracy of ours and how things would only be better if people engaged blah blah