Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Scottish independence referendum polling thread

"Should Scotland be an independent country?"

  • Yes

    Votes: 43 66.2%
  • No

    Votes: 17 26.2%
  • Other

    Votes: 3 4.6%

  • Total voters
    65
  • Poll closed .
An average of the last 6 polls has it at 49/51% now.
BxrymrnCEAAIA-F.jpg
 
Previous comparable ICM poll: 45% Yes 55% No
Survation: 46% Yes 54% No
Opinium: 47% Yes 53% No

The previous ones for ICM had either:

1) YES 54%/ NO 46% (online for telegraph) - which would make tonights a 10% swing to NO
or
2) Yes 49/No 51 (phone) which shows a 2% move to NO.

If tonights was online as DQ said then it's the first one we have to compare. Either way there was a move away from YES not a move towards YES in the ICM results - a small one or a large one.
 
The previous ones for ICM had either:

1) YES 54%/ NO 46% (online for telegraph) - which would make tonights a 10% swing to NO
or
2) Yes 49/No 51 (phone) which shows a 2% move to NO.

If tonights was online as DQ said then it's the first one we have to compare. Either way there was a move away from YES not a move towards YES in the ICM results - a small one or a large one.

I'm comparing with the last ICM poll for the Scotsman (who commissioned this one)
http://www.scotsman.com/news/politi...pendence-poll-icm-puts-yes-up-to-48-1-3543614
 
Whatever the result, with it being as close as this, there are going to be a lot of disappointed people Friday.
I have to admit I'm looking forward to seeing so many disappointed nationalists, Scot or English. `Ooh my poor flag/tree/hill/coin/bit of ground, boo hoo.`
 
I have to admit I'm looking forward to seeing so many disappointed nationalists, Scot or English. `Ooh my poor flag/tree/hill/coin/bit of ground, boo hoo.`
Nope, I don't think it will be a healthy result for whoever wins. Whoever wins, almost half the electorate will have disagreed, that can't be healthy.
 
I was chatting to one of the No guys about this on Twitter earlier. Most of the people I've seen out campaigning for Yes (and he says, No side is the same ) are people who've never been involved in politics in any kind of way beyond voting - not door rattling or leafletting, nothing. One of my friends is entirely sceptical of elections, their value, etc, votes anyway - he designed and printed 5000 booklets on 'What about Yes?' to try and sway undecideds - going out, asking people on the street if they'd decided, and just going after the people that hadn't made up their minds. It looks far more like grassroots than anything i've seen in recent years - yeah, there'll be the usual astroturfing but this on both sides seems like some actual genuine engagement. In spite of the bitterness and bile that's come out on both sides occasionally, I'm choosing to be heartened by that aspect.
 
Nope, I don't think it will be a healthy result for whoever wins. Whoever wins, almost half the electorate will have disagreed, that can't be healthy.
I don't know why but I'm finding it all quite irritating. All the politicians make me feel a bit ill, all the flag waving, silly people shouting at each other in the street, multiple crystal ball gazing about tax/pensions/oil/currencies...yeah whatever.

Newsnight: last UK election in Scotland - SNP 490,000 votes, Tories 420,000 votes.
 
Coolfonz - I just think those are pretty depressing posts. If you're not interested in politics, fine. I will never see the establishment (and maybe even globally) in this country so shaken. Quite frankly, a yes vote would be a massive force of good across Britain. Plenty of groups on Yes that I have seen campaign without saltires. For you to equate the nationalism of the Yes campaign and the very real nationalism of Westminster (that results in war) is just depressing. If you can't even bring yourself to support the Scottish left (SYRIZA have), I have no idea what people will do in the future to give you any hope that we will see a politically conscious proletariat (i.e, poor people taking to the streets and discussing pensions, benefits, corporate power). A no vote will return to the status quo, where we celebrate the odd strike in London that we hear about on libcom.
 
Fuck it, you bastards better vote Yes as the party won't be one to be missed. Missed the Portuguese one back in April 1974 due to poverty but count me in on this one.
 
Nope, I don't think it will be a healthy result for whoever wins. Whoever wins, almost half the electorate will have disagreed, that can't be healthy.


How about something like 51.6% in favour? Would that be unhealthy?

OK, I'm suppose I'm being snide, and I will stop.

I'm remembering a vote of 51.6% in favour of devolution in 1979 and we did not get it, but, you know, there were no bombs and shooting and stuff, if that's what you mean by "unhealthy".
 
Woman who is going to actually announce Yes or No on Today!
4.285 million regged 97% of population. Expected turn out 80%+!

She wants a nice steady count process from 2100. Opening, then splitting into y/n.
Timing - she expects breakfast time for results 0600ish Friday.
Depends on getting boxes. Some coming from Ireland (?) the Islands
Never had probs with queues for elections before so hopes none.
Counting officers consider it a privilege.
Mary Pitcaithly (sp)

Edit: opening postal votes already (?) and keeping them face down.
 
Last edited:
Early reports i've heard from postal ballots seem baffled at only a 70-75% return rate. Maybe that it's undecideds who have opted to go the take it to the polling station route.
 
Early reports i've heard from postal ballots seem baffled at only a 70-75% return rate. Maybe that it's undecideds who have opted to go the take it to the polling station route.
are you allowed to do that? I thought if you got a postal, you had to use it or lose it
 
correct
a fair few postal votes get handed in on the day
they get recorded and sometimes taken to the count centre by the area supervisor in the day
they can be submitted until close of poll and go to the count with polling paper
 
Back
Top Bottom