Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The New Tories - Ruthlessly Incompetent. Post Examples of Tory Stupidity Here

Quality. After last weeks blathering about being an evangelical christian his constituency office calls the police on a bishop trying to hand in a letter about food poverty. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/fe...es-food-banks-cameron-201442075222549798.html

Even Blair had the sense to (follow Alastair Campbell's advice and) keep his sky-pixie fantasies out of the news, lest the public ask questions about his (in)capacity for rational judgement and suitability for public office.

So, Cameron is following the footsteps of Ronald "Looney-Tunes" Reagan in the sky-pixie supporters club.
What could possibly go wrong...
:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Now IDS and Greive are sticking there heads above the parapet and repeating the 'Christian Country' bullshit.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27121879

I smell Crosby at work, and I'm guessing the subtext is ' it's not for those, y'know, Muslim types' with perhaps some angling to highlight Milliband's Jewish ancestry.

Wasn't this one of the BNP's lines too?

Not sure it's a vote-winner, but maybe their focus groups say otherwise.
 
Now IDS and Greive are sticking there heads above the parapet and repeating the 'Christian Country' bullshit.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27121879

I smell Crosby at work, and I'm guessing the subtext is ' it's not for those, y'know, Muslim types' with perhaps some angling to highlight Milliband's Jewish ancestry.

Wasn't this one of the BNP's lines too?

Not sure it's a vote-winner, but maybe their focus groups say otherwise.

I wasn't sure where to put this or even if it deserved it's own thread but in light of the above quote (bold, mine) what to make of this? I know they planned on carrying out a review - largely to keep the Saudis sweet imo but anyway...

Government review of the Muslim Brotherhood

Purpose
The purpose of the review is to produce an internal report to the Prime Minister to inform government policy towards the Muslim Brotherhood. The scope of the review covers the Muslim Brotherhood’s origins, philosophy, activities, record in and out of government; its organisation and activities in the UK and abroad which might put at risk, damage, or risk damaging UK national interests. It will look at the Muslim Brotherhood’s impact on, and influence over, UK national interests, at home and abroad, as well as its wider influence on UK society. It will also look at current government policy as well as allies’ approaches and policies, and assess the implications for UK policy.

Evidence
Interested parties may submit evidence. Please refer to the review’s purpose above and follow the guidelines below:

Submissions should be no longer than 3,000 words and include a summary of up to 500 words.
Please keep the use of colour to a minimum and use numbered paragraphs.
Please state clearly who the submission is from, and in what capacity (eg sent by the representative of an organisation on its behalf).
All submissions may be published, in whole or in part. Any material that should remain confidential should be clearly marked as such.
The deadline for receipt of evidence is Friday 30 May 2014.
 
I wasn't sure where to put this or even if it deserved it's own thread but in light of the above quote (bold, mine) what to make of this? I know they planned on carrying out a review - largely to keep the Saudis sweet imo but anyway...

Government review of the Muslim Brotherhood
I see that loathsome creep Teflon Tony has popped up like a corpse in a zombie film, spouting about the threat from Islam.

No, you twat, the threat is from any religion which seeks to control people by imposing fuckwitted, thought-free bullshit on free-thinking people. Any sky-pixie twats that want to prohibit or hinder enjoyment of beer are especially worthy of a good kicking.
 
I see that loathsome creep Teflon Tony has popped up like a corpse in a zombie film, spouting about the threat from Islam.

No, you twat, the threat is from any organised religion which seeks to control people by imposing fuckwitted, thought-free bullshit on free-thinking people. Any sky-pixie twats that want to restrict or hinder enjoyment of beer are especially worthy of a good kicking.

Nice to see good old war mongering christians wanting to get others to fight all those outside their influence again.
 
Nice to see good old war mongering christians wanting to get others to fight all those outside their influence again.
When the peasants get restless because they can see how wicked and corrupt their rulers are, it's time to scatter a good bucketful of divide-and-rule to keep them distracted.
 
I see that loathsome creep Teflon Tony has popped up like a corpse in a zombie film, spouting about the threat from Islam.

No, you twat, the threat is from any religion which seeks to control people by imposing fuckwitted, thought-free bullshit on free-thinking people. Any sky-pixie twats that want to prohibit or hinder enjoyment of beer are especially worthy of a good kicking.


What ever you think of islam I wonder if the grinning spinning blair stated if the threat from islam might be due to a century of US and before that UK imperialism
 
What ever you think of islam I wonder if the grinning spinning blair stated if the threat from islam might be due to a century of US and before that UK imperialism
Well there is that, but then it's interesting to remember that far worse was dished out to Native Americans by white invaders, yet you don't see them indulging in bloodthirsty terror atrocities, or flying airliners into buildings.
No chip-shouldered, power-hungry religion, churches or temples, see?

BTW, are you seeing a marked increase in people asking for free food at gurdwaras?
 
Last edited:
Pupils up to four-years-old or between 16 and 19 years or with medical needs are eligible for the charge from September, which is reduced to £660 for the first year only. Low income families pay half.

More to the point, they are charging children with special needs to actually get to school.
 
BmNsZWUCQAA9yru.png


Beautiful, just beautiful.
 
Another case of "back to the bad old days", then. :(
Did this happen at all before? I mean I know education simply didn't exist for special needs in most cases... but here we have an example of school being compulsory, then being charged for it. If mainstream education started charging there would be a riot.

And of course the storm is all about the language about it, rather than what is actually happening.
 
Did this happen at all before? I mean I know education simply didn't exist for special needs in most cases... but here we have an example of school being compulsory, then being charged for it. If mainstream education started charging there would be a riot.

And of course the storm is all about the language about it, rather than what is actually happening.

Special schools like Chaley Heritage used to charge. Most of the time the cost was met by the LEA, but if the parents were monied-up, they had to pay the fees themselves. This was kind of excused by the fact that such schools were "boarders only", but even so...
Expecting parents to pay transport costs when they're always going to be greater than using available public transport is the thin end of a very shitty wedge. :(
 
Special schools like Chaley Heritage used to charge. Most of the time the cost was met by the LEA, but if the parents were monied-up, they had to pay the fees themselves. This was kind of excused by the fact that such schools were "boarders only", but even so...
Expecting parents to pay transport costs when they're always going to be greater than using available public transport is the thin end of a very shitty wedge. :(
And the article doesn't seem to be too bothered by that.. That and the three day week for post 16s that's making Leeds special schools trying to set themselves up as "social care" as well as education to get around.
Both my boys go to different schools miles apart from each other. Even if I wanted to I couldn't get them all there at the same time.
 
"It's all to do with money, isn't it?"

Funny, that's what my manager told us just before she started the cruel and byzantine process of one-way consultation that's going to cost 3 of us our jobs, and put the remainder onto impossible terms.

And the sickener is - it isn't all about money. Or at least it shouldn't be. It only becomes "all to do with money" when you view the service you're providing as some kind of bonus extra, a favour that you're doing people, whether that's providing counselling to kids in school (in my case), or transport to enable them to get to school (Cllr Cunt's case). Frankly, if it's "all to do with money", there's no fucking point bothering. Especially not when you betray your real feelings by labelling such kids as "a burden".

Cunt.
 
Back
Top Bottom