So brave.So the current narrative from the Tories appears to be that Wragg was snagged by some super smart, master criminal manipulator and he's very brave for owning up to essentially throwing his colleagues under the bus to try and save his own skin. (Apparently this all happened a year ago so presumably he's only 'fessing up now cos his role in this was about to be revealed. )
The law is an ass.
Hunt said on the news, ' it happens to us all in everyday life '.So the current narrative from the Tories appears to be that Wragg was snagged by some super smart, master criminal manipulator and he's very brave for owning up to essentially throwing his colleagues under the bus to try and save his own skin. (Apparently this all happened a year ago so presumably he's only 'fessing up now cos his role in this was about to be revealed. )
That would wrap things up nicely. Or as Pickman's model would say, ' turned out nice again'.The police must be all over this, and I am keeping my fingers crossed than it ends up being Dan Wootton, and he's shitting himself ATM.
Are the cops actually investigating this?
The Met Police has confirmed it is "carrying out an investigation following reports that a number of unsolicited messages were sent to MPs over recent months".
Earlier this week, Leicestershire Police said it was "investigating a report of malicious communications" that had been made to them last month.
Possibly Section 127 of the communications act 2003BBC says
I'm not a lawyer or policeperson, so not sure what law/s might have been broken here.
An offence under section 127 CA 2003 may be committed in a number of different ways:
- s.127(1) – an offender sends, or causes to be sent, via a public communications network a communication that is either grossly offensive, or of an indecent, obscene, or menacing character;
the party has now deleted another social media exhortation not to let “the doomsters and the naysayers” talk down Britain.
The post on X claimed that Britain was the second most powerful country in the world, illustrated by pictures including a Canadian-owned Aston Martin, a US F-35 fighter jet and a Eurofighter Typhoon aircraft developed by a European consortium while the UK was in the EU.
But the image may have been deleted from social media because it included a picture of King Charles – a breach of protocol since parties are meant to avoid dragging the royal family into political debate. Buckingham Palace did not comment, but it is understood that the post had been noted by senior palace officials before it was deleted last Friday.
Canadian (owned) car, US jet and a German Monarch!Sometimes you can only point and laugh.
Tories delete social media post plugging Britain with a US jet, a Canadian car and a defeated football team
The post on X also breached royal protocol on politics by using image of the kingwww.theguardian.com
How are they measuring people who don't want a job? Is it by the number of UC claims they've closed?
There are also older people near retirement age who could work but can manage financially without it, so don't or only work part time. They wouldn't show up via UC claims.How are they measuring people who don't want a job? Is it by the number of UC claims they've closed?
16 -64 employment rate; pretty crude and the age criteria look a little dated, but nonetheless the trends are obvious:How are they measuring people who don't want a job? Is it by the number of UC claims they've closed?
The Resolution Foundation piece being quoted is here:How are they measuring people who don't want a job? Is it by the number of UC claims they've closed?
A Tory MP is under investigation over allegations that he misused campaign funds and abused his position after making a late-night phone call saying he’d been locked up by “bad people” who were demanding thousands of pounds, The Times can reveal.
Mark Menzies, the Conservative MP for Fylde and a government trade envoy, rang an elderly local party volunteer at 3.15am in December saying he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”. The sum, which rose to £6,500, was paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from campaign funds raised from donors.
£14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities had previously been transferred to Menzies’s personal bank account and used for his private medical expenses.
The Conservative Party has been aware of the allegations of potential fraud for more than three months and has taken no action. The MP was accused of paying for sex from a male escort in 2014.
The phone call came in the dead of night.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Are you on your own?” the man said, with urgency in his voice. “I’ve got in with some bad people and they’ve got me locked in a flat and they want £5,000 to release me.”
The caller was Mark Menzies, 52, the Conservative MP for Fylde in Lancashire.
He had rung his 78-year-old former campaign manager, a woman who The Times is not naming, waking her from her sleep to ask her to hand over thousands of pounds from a bank account containing donations to the MP’s campaign.
She told Menzies that it was 3.15am and she couldn’t transfer any money without leaving the house. He became angry, allegedly telling her it was “a matter of life and death”, and demanding she instead lend him the money from her own savings, according to an account she has subsequently given to friends and the Conservative Party.
The woman refused and told the MP that she would speak to his long-time constituency office manager, Shirley Green, in the morning. A few hours later, Green stumped up the money, telling local Tories that she had cashed in her Isa to do so. By then, the sum demanded had risen to £6,500.
Later that day, having been rescued from the flat in which he had been detained, Menzies rang the 78-year-old again.
He told her that he had summoned one of his staffers to London to collect him from the flat. On arrival, the junior staffer handed over his own money, a sum thought to be a few hundred pounds, which Menzies said he owed to two other men.
Asked if he was concerned he could be blackmailed again, Menzies said he would change his phone number.
The following day, on another call, Menzies said that he needed another £35,000 for medical bills.
Told there was no more money in the campaign funds bank account, Menzies was unperturbed. “Oh, we’ll raise some more,” he allegedly replied.
ADVERTISEMENT
A source close to Menzies said the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. It was falsely claimed that he had been sick at one point and several people at the address then demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses.
The source said Menzies decided to pay them because he was scared of what would happen otherwise, but did not have the funds to transfer the money from his own savings. His aides gave him money “as friends who wanted to help”.
Thousands in campaign funds
Green was reimbursed the £6,500 she gave Menzies in December from funds donated by local supporters to cover the MP’s campaign expenses.
The money was in an account with the name Fylde Westminster Group and was set up as a local business group to allow supporters to donate to Menzies.
A source close to Menzies said that he had offered to repay this sum, but claimed local Tories controlling the account said he did not need to.
The practice of setting up a local business group is common among MPs because donors do not have to declare a donation to the Conservative Party in company accounts, and donors are not publicly declared at all until they reach a certain threshold. It was used to raise funds for his campaigning activities and was administered by his former campaign manager and by Green, his office manager.
Sounds all too weirdSomeone called Mark Menzies turns out to be an MP for something called Fylde and he's in the Times tonight.
View attachment 420335
It sounds like either sex or drugs or a combination of the two. A "meetup" gone wrong, which he then tried to fix by using donor/local party funds, and all covered up by the wider party.Sounds all too weird