When I am having a discussion that requires the use of evidence than I will give it a go. This is not one.
Why doesn't this require evidence? Where's your evidence and explanation for this new unsupported assertion?
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
Can speak for anyone else, but I'd be interested to see the basis for you deciding what it is that "the voters want".Exactly what are you saying requires evidence?
Usually, if you make assertions, it's generally expected for you to provide some argument along with any supporting evidence.
I believe there will be a Tory government for the next 20 years as the country is shifting to the right. I have no evidence but its what I believe, its not something I'm going to keep repeating unless people across all the threads keep quoting me on it.
Can speak for anyone else, but I'd be interested to see the basis for you deciding what it is that "the voters want".
what will be will be.
On the basis that Labour has been, and is still doing this same shift to the right, essentially following the same (but slightly less 'hard and fast') politics of privatisation, austerity and cuts, selling off of social housing and public services, etc. as the Tories, what then?
Corbyn was supposed to move the policies of the Labour party to the left. Something he has completely failed to do.
Give up pal; you've lost the plot completely.
Exactly what are you saying requires evidence?
So, what do you think will happen next?
And your work here will be complete when you've persuaded everyone else to do fuck all and suck it up?Are you saying that I can influence the future political path of the country, as I don't believe I can.
I think the labour party will fail to get into power in the next government.
Both of your assertions obviously. The first relating to 20 more years of Tory rule claim and the second regarding this being an evidence free zone.
So to make it easy for you; firstly, what is the evidence (and the explanation that evidence supports) which convinces you that another two decades of Conservative government is on the cards? Secondly, what is it about this discussion which excuses it from requiring some sort factual and analytic underpinning? If you are just here for entertainment's sake then you could be a bit more up front about it...and a bit more entertaining.
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
I see, and what do you attribute this problem? Do you think replacing Corbyn will help? Bearing in mind that most of the Labour PLP (Parliamentary Labour Party) have no interest in moving leftwards?
A political party is supposed to decide "what the people want" and promise to deliver that in order to try and win votes.
If you are asking me what people in this country want - then I would say they want more money to provide for themselves, and less insecurity over their homes. But its just my opinion.
And your work here will be complete when you've persuaded everyone else to do fuck all and suck it up?
Is that all they can do? If so it's a pretty limited view and one which doesn't accord with the past actions of political parties; think about the ideological and cultural changes championed by the Thatcher governments.
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
It would help the labour party if Corbyn could apply some of his ideals to actual policies and issues affecting the country, and make steps to communicate directly with the people he wants to convince.
You'll have to excuse me here, as I'm a bit confused. You see, you seem to have issues with the working class, whom are the core foundation of left and traditional Labour politics. So, it seems to me that you need to connect with these people - in fact you've said that above. And yet, your current approach seems to be in opposition to that?
What evidence could I provide to satisfy you? The boundary changes, the fact people in Labour heartlands are voting UKIP, the Tories are destroying the country and still topping the opinion polls.
I am a member of the working class as I define myself. The labour party needs to connect with them or whoever it needs to in order to deliver a better government than the tory party.
I also think that there a large number of working class racists, for which I get constant stick. Whether the labour party can change their mind or not I don't know but I am opposed to pandering to their racism. If pandering to their racism means they stay in opposition forever then I will have to live with that.
Also, you seem to take issue with unions regularly, who are part of that left tradition of fighting for, and ensuring that workers have better pay and conditions and for protection at work. All of this came from homegrown 'bottom up' fight from the left tradition (it wasn't just given by the EU - in fact, many of these things were adopted by the EU based on the UK having led the way). I don't know, you've got me properly baffled here at times.
Why do W/C racists give you stick particularly?
I am a member of the working class as I define myself. The labour party needs to connect with them or whoever it needs to in order to deliver a better government than the tory party.
I also think that there a large number of working class racists, for which I get constant stick. Whether the labour party can change their mind or not I don't know but I am opposed to pandering to their racism. If pandering to their racism means they stay in opposition forever then I will have to live with that.
And what you think is the best thing to do with any working class people that may show some racist sentiment? You know, not organised racists/fascists, but everyday people who might show it. Would you say that reaching out to them, showing social and economic approaches that can practically improve their lives (housing, public services, jobs and security), whilst also working towards dispelling such frictions between different communities and races might be the way here? After all, most of this division results from capitalism and class structures - most of these aren't going to be 'natural racists'. Surely, you don't just set up a tier of yourself as the non-racist working class and just consign everybody else to the gutter? Doesn't this just make the situation worse, as we're seeing in practise as it goes?
I will take the best of the EU and the best of the UK for workers rights, but it is likely leaving the EU under the current government will lead to a bonfire of those rights.