brogdale
Coming to terms with late onset Anarchism
Well, tbf the membership stymied the 'treachery'.yeh like the others didn't want in on the action too
Well, tbf the membership stymied the 'treachery'.yeh like the others didn't want in on the action too
and how long did they allow this 'treachery' to carry on for?Well, tbf the membership stymied the 'treachery'.
Almost exactly 3 months.and how long did they allow this 'treachery' to carry on for?
yeh. and did they boycott this 'treacherous' battle or did they dispute it like socialists?Almost exactly 3 months.
They chose the left social democrat over the right social democrat.yeh. and did they boycott this 'treacherous' battle or did they dispute it like socialists?
yeh. but did they boycott the contest in droves?They chose the left social democrat over the right social democrat.
No, some paid £25 to join in.yeh. but did they boycott the contest in droves?
so they were complicit in the eventNo, some paid £25 to join in.
Boycotting is hardly likely from a self-selecting group of folk invested in the notion of Parliamentary social democracy.so they were complicit in the event
no further questions.Boycotting is hardly likely from a self-selecting group of folk invested in the notion of Parliamentary social democracy.
Agreed 'complicit' in the sense that they did respond to the 'treachery' of the 172 of the PLP, but not complicit with initiating the event; that was the right PLP.so they were complicit in the event
no further questions, you may leave the stand.Agreed 'complicit' in the sense that they did respond to the 'treachery' of the 172 of the PLP, but not complicit with initiating the event; that was the right PLP.
no further questions, you may leave the stand.
There's a thread around about the consequences of a weak Labour Party which always makes me think "well we know the consequences, we've had one for years now".Indeed, but their decline into irrelevance began before then.
aye, because I'm debating. You haven't explained at all why you think this particular quote is so brilliant or really discussed it in any way .This is utter fucking rubbish, where in the quote below does it say any such thing.
This is the second time on this thread you've come out with this bollocks.
So quite frankly either you apologise for that smear (the second time on this thread you've made it or something similar) or fuck off.The rest of your sentence, and the quote you claim is "absolutely bloody brilliant" were about racism and sexism, and how essential it is that those at the sharp end should put up with it.
The alt-right have perpetuated age-old reactionary tropes by continuing the old stereotypes of uppity negroes, shrill women, gays who force it down your throats etc, rephrasing them as "SJWs", "virtue signalling" and "identity politics".And why have the alt right done so well out of identity politics ?
there's no smear, I've told you how I read that quote and I'm asking you to explain what you think it says.Neither anything I've posted nor the quote argues, or even implies, that
So quite frankly either you apologise for that smear (the second time on this thread you've made it or something similar) or fuck off.
What's "divided" us is your repeated attempts to cast myself (and danny) as willing to support racism.
because they're so ruthless in the way they target anger and grievances against target hate groups. Their agenda revolves around white nationalism and they don't care who gets hurt.And why have the alt right done so well out of identity politics ?
And why have the alt right done so well out of identity politics ?
You say this as if you were pointing at something self-evident. But what do you mean?
can you add a bit more to the explanation then please.It seems to me that whilst being ruthless in the way they target 'target hate groups' and the fact that they have rephrased old stereotypes doesn't fully explain how they have moved from the marginal shadows to the centre stage of politics.
He Putin or he Bradshaw?What the fuck is he up to?
Labour MP Ben Bradshaw says British people have a right to know if Russia meddled in Brexit
He Putin or he Bradshaw?
TaBradshaw
It would seem he's trying to discredit the result and undermine support for it. Or do you think there's something else to it?What the fuck is he up to?
Labour MP Ben Bradshaw says British people have a right to know if Russia meddled in Brexit
It would seem he's trying to discredit the result and undermine support for it. Or do you think there's something else to it?