I was taking the piss. But do expand please.
c4uA masturbatory fantasy that’s been bullshit for decades.
We have been actively fucked over by the USA since at leastWW21776 despite throwing money and knowledge at them. They fucked us withholding nuclear tech, the told us to jog on over Suez, our air industry bled knowledge to Boeing and the newer fighters come with so many clauses British engineers can’t work on them. Blair was convinced we’d get special treatment from the US and marched us to war but we got fuck all.
We have been discussing brexit here for years. Find a single post of mine extolling the benefits of brexit? Well bar giving the tories a great big kick.Its hard to tell when your taking the piss because you seem pretty invested in how great Brexit is going to be.
The Anglo-Saxon Heritage aspect of the special relationship isn't tripping some alarms for you?
Probably banned from overflying France if there are UK passengers on board.Wow the January 1st travel ban to Europe is pretty full on. Presume it doesn't apply to non-EU countries in Europe such as Switzerland.
Their contingency plans dont amount to much if they are not signed up to?U.K., EU brace for no-deal Brexit cliff as trade talks falter
Contingency measures look to ensure that basic air and road connectivity are maintained.www.axios.com
We have been discussing brexit here for years. Find a single post of mine extolling the benefits of brexit? Well bar giving the tories a great big kick.
(...) Particularly as the EU think they'll get a better deal from the UK next year after they've had a no deal beasting.
Its quite a lot of that mixed with a bit of resentment towards former self declared anti capitalists who loudly extolled support for the EU and asserted that this was the only acceptable position, denigrating any naysayers with smears and lies.My mistake, seeing your "the EU are fucked, the EU will blink" posts in the last few pages I assumed you were a pro-Leaver but I can see your more of a "Fuck the lot of them and capitalism to" poster.
Its quite a lot of that mixed with a bit of resentment towards former self declared anti capitalists who loudly extolled support for the EU and asserted that this was the only acceptable position, denigrating any naysayers with smears and lies.
So you voted for something that has no benefits, only the clear catalogue of disasters that are going to hurt people, result in food shortages, less travel opportunities, restrict the arts, stop bands from touring, empowered racists and xenophobes and drain billions in never ending pointless bureaucracy? Oh, OK.We have been discussing brexit here for years. Find a single post of mine extolling the benefits of brexit? Well bar giving the tories a great big kick.
Well if you want to tie me to all that then you take take responsibility for all the dead Greeks? Plus the drowned refugees?So you voted for something that has no benefits, only the clear catalogue of disasters that are going to hurt people, result in food shortages, less travel opportunities, restrict the arts, stop bands from touring, empowered racists and xenophobes and drain billions in never ending pointless bureaucracy? Oh, OK.
Well if you want to tie me to all that then you take take responsibility for all the dead Greeks? Plus the drowned refugees?
Your beloved EU is not a benign workers paradise.
Haven't checked, but Switzerland is part of the free movement area, like Norway, so quite possibly it applies there as well. Not an easily googlable answer.Wow the January 1st travel ban to Europe is pretty full on. Presume it doesn't apply to non-EU countries in Europe such as Switzerland.
How is that relevant, though? The UK leaving the EU doesn't help refugees or the Greeks. Tthe UK's record generally on refugees has been shamefully poor for a long time and all the signs are that it is about to get even worse. As a net contributor to the EU budget, the UK leaving the EU is only going to reduce any potential money pot available to go to poorer areas within the EU, so if anything the argument can be made the other way - UK withdrawing has a potentially negative effect for poorer countries within the EU, not positive.Well if you want to tie me to all that then you take take responsibility for all the dead Greeks? Plus the drowned refugees?
Your beloved EU is not a benign workers paradise.
Sorry, I can't see your words for all the strawmen you've just erected there.Well if you want to tie me to all that then you take take responsibility for all the dead Greeks? Plus the drowned refugees?
Your beloved EU is not a benign workers paradise.
How is that relevant, though? The UK leaving the EU doesn't help refugees or the Greeks. Tthe UK's record generally on refugees has been shamefully poor for a long time and all the signs are that it is about to get even worse. As a net contributor to the EU budget, the UK leaving the EU is only going to reduce any potential money pot available to go to poorer areas within the EU, so if anything the argument can be made the other way - UK withdrawing has a potentially negative effect for poorer countries within the EU, not positive.
Meanwhile there are all kinds of immediate negatives for us from withdrawal. Concrete things we can point at. And anybody wishing to influence EU policy direction from the UK has lost many of the means that were previously available to them. The UK-based organisation Compasion in World Farming is a good example of the negative effect of withdrawal in this regard - it has previously pushed through reforms of farming practices at an EU law level.
Indeed. You've got to be really dreaming if you think Brexit is somehow going to soften the UK's stance on refugees, and make things better for them.How is that relevant, though? The UK leaving the EU doesn't help refugees or the Greeks. Tthe UK's record generally on refugees has been shamefully poor for a long time and all the signs are that it is about to get even worse. As a net contributor to the EU budget, the UK leaving the EU is only going to reduce any potential money pot available to go to poorer areas within the EU, so if anything the argument can be made the other way - UK withdrawing has a potentially negative effect for poorer countries within the EU, not positive.
everyone who has voted has a lot to answer forSo you voted for something that has no benefits, only the clear catalogue of disasters that are going to hurt people, result in food shortages, less travel opportunities, restrict the arts, stop bands from touring, empowered racists and xenophobes and drain billions in never ending pointless bureaucracy? Oh, OK.
yes it was and no it hasn'tThis is exactly the point. You don't have to be a cheerleader for the EU to be against this brexit. And you have to be naive as hell ever to have thought that any other kind of brexit was possible, given who it was that was campaigning for brexit and has been politically empowered by it. This has all been very clear right from the start.
The EU isn't a workers paradise no but oddly enough most of the countries with strong employment protection rights are members of it and it does set out minimum standards which the UK has always put plenty of effort in trying to wiggle out off.Well if you want to tie me to all that then you take take responsibility for all the dead Greeks? Plus the drowned refugees?
Your beloved EU is not a benign workers paradise.
We have been discussing brexit here for years. Find a single post of mine extolling the benefits of brexit? Well bar giving the tories a great big kick.
No it hasn't
Ive never got a satisfactory answer to this one - anti-refugee policy was driven by nation states. The EUs attempt to broker cross-europe quota on taking refugees was quashed - by nation states.As for the drowned refugees in the Med being the fault of the EU, Assuming the EU did not exist and that Europe was still made up of independent states how would things be different? Would Italy or Greece or Spain be rolling out the welcome wagon for them?
There's proof here on Urban if you want to wind back to 2016 and look at pre-referendum posts. It was clear to plenty of posters on here that notions of a 'lexit' were a fantasy. Yet here we are nearly five years later and still the argument is made that opposing brexit is somehow cheerleading neoliberalism. It's bollocks, and always was.no it hasn't
Workers rights are stronger where there are strong and organised trade unions . Employee rights in France and Germany are strong because of the unions standing firm from attacks by their governments attempting to strip them away due to EU budget rules . The TUC after the defeat of the miners lumped in with supporting the EU as some form of check/ protection against the Tories .The EU isn't a workers paradise no but oddly enough most of the countries with strong employment protection rights are members of it and it does set out minimum standards which the UK has always put plenty of effort in trying to wiggle out off.
As for the drowned refugees in the Med being the fault of the EU, Assuming the EU did not exist and that Europe was still made up of independent states how would things be different? Would Italy or Greece or Spain be rolling out the welcome wagon for them?