Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The big Brexit thread - news, updates and discussion

If EU minimum standards rise, then UK standards will rise (to avoid consequences). However, it won't work the other way. UK standards can go as high as they like, but EU countries won't have to follow suit. It has to be that way, because otherwise the EU would be giving the UK a power to single-handedly determine EU policy that the EU's own member states don't have.

So, it's a one-way ratchet. Like a one-way street, but confusing.
Gotta say, I think it’s an unfair clause if it doesn’t apply both ways. The reason it’s unpalatable to the EU to give the UK power to set standards is exactly the same reason why is also unpalatable in reverse. Either you allow both parties to have control over the other equally or you allow neither to have it.
 
Interesting to look back 11 months:


Is it? Effectively nothing has happened in that time.
 
Gotta say, I think it’s an unfair clause if it doesn’t apply both ways. The reason it’s unpalatable to the EU to give the UK power to set standards is exactly the same reason why is also unpalatable in reverse. Either you allow both parties to have control over the other equally or you allow neither to have it.

If only we were in the EU to influence and increase both ways.
 
I don't think there is any talk about giving the UK powers to dictate standards. The options have been UK stays as is or increases in line with eu.
 
Look at the state of it.

Eo04_OmXMAMifwH
 
Gotta say, I think it’s an unfair clause if it doesn’t apply both ways. The reason it’s unpalatable to the EU to give the UK power to set standards is exactly the same reason why is also unpalatable in reverse. Either you allow both parties to have control over the other equally or you allow neither to have it.


Bit like the state aid thing, the EU says the U.K. can’t give state aid to companies, but the EU can cos it is not a state, it’s only their member states that can’t.
 
If there ends up being no deal, that is a dismal failure for Barnier and the EU as well as for Johnson and the U.K.
 
Gotta say, I think it’s an unfair clause if it doesn’t apply both ways. The reason it’s unpalatable to the EU to give the UK power to set standards is exactly the same reason why is also unpalatable in reverse. Either you allow both parties to have control over the other equally or you allow neither to have it.
Is there precedent for such an agreement anywhere - where one party is much larger than the other?
 
If there ends up being no deal, that is a dismal failure for Barnier and the EU as well as for Johnson and the U.K.

MB can only negotiate up to the limits mandate he's given by the EU27. Ultimately the want a deal but won't compromise the single market to get it. Particularly as the EU think they'll get a better deal from the UK next year after they've had a no deal beasting.
 
MB can only negotiate up to the limits mandate he's given by the EU27. Ultimately the want a deal but won't compromise the single market to get it. Particularly as the EU think they'll get a better deal from the UK next year after they've had a no deal beasting.
The fact that he can only negotiate up to the limits set for him is why no deal is a failure of the EU. But even within those limits, an different negotiator given a different approach for the last four years may well have been able to achieve something.

It takes two sides to negotiate. Failure to get a deal is not just the fault of one side.
 
Is there precedent for such an agreement anywhere - where one party is much larger than the other?
What precedents are there for a country just accepting the all rules today and forever of a club without being a member of that club? Is that something that eg Norway has signed up to? It seems like a really bad idea.
 
Gotta say, I think it’s an unfair clause if it doesn’t apply both ways. The reason it’s unpalatable to the EU to give the UK power to set standards is exactly the same reason why is also unpalatable in reverse. Either you allow both parties to have control over the other equally or you allow neither to have it.
You're absolutely right it is unfair but we're now up against the harsh reality of we need a deal with them way more than they need one with us. The US is going to screw us over as well for exactly the same reason.
The fact that our politicians are a bunch of self-serving cunts shouldn't obscure the fact that other countries politicians are as well.
 
Back
Top Bottom