Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
but will congress ratify it?Bloomberg will do a deal. He's a real Anglophile.
but will congress ratify it?Bloomberg will do a deal. He's a real Anglophile.
it was on the bottom where the small print wasFor fuck's sake. This wasn't on the side of the cunty bullshitting bus
Brexit will have soon cost the UK more than all its payments to the EU over the past 47 years put together
Brexit has already cost the UK £130 billion in lost growth since 2016, research by Bloomberg found.www.businessinsider.com
Project fear.....somely accurate prediction.it was on the bottom where the small print was
e2a: it just fulfils this 2016 prediction
View attachment 199789
Economy, The Economic Consequences of Brexit: A Taxing Decision
I am shocked, shocked I tell you.
The UK’s negotiating mandate asks that:
• A liberalised market for trade in goods, with no tariffs, fees, charges or quantitative restrictions on trade in manufactured or agricultural products.
• Competition and subsidies should not be subject to the final agreement’s dispute resolution mechanism, which had been previously signalled in the political declaration.
• A separate agreement on fisheries that would allow for annual negotiations on access to each other’s waters including allowable catch and shares. The EU wants fishing to be considered as part of the overall agreement.
• An agreement on equivalence on financial services to be decided before the end of June.
The UK rejected the EU’s negotiating mandate when it was set out on Tuesday. Downing Street said it did not recognise the need for a “level playing field” for competition.
Indeed, but the EU are being no better. Insisting the UK has to have a more restrictive set of requirements than other countries because it is physically closer by? That’s just as pathetic.Bullshit posturing by faux hard men and randist advisors.
Lol
What a fucking toilet this place is
Indeed, but the EU are being no better. Insisting the UK has to have a more restrictive set of requirements than other countries because it is physically closer by? That’s just as pathetic.
Last week Google notified users that “because the UK is leaving the EU, we’ve updated our terms so that a United States-based company, Google LLC, is now your service provider instead of Google Ireland Limited. We’ve also changed our privacy policy to make Google LLC the data controller responsible for your information and for complying with applicable privacy laws.”
This makes sense. There is no reason why two countries that are not in the EU should store data in an EU country. It would be much better, of course, if Google stored UK data in the UK. However, now we are just one of dozens of small countries, it may be hard to justify the cost.
Other online service providers may well make the same decision, after weighing the financial, commercial and legal costs of storing UK users’ data locally.
Never knew it was so complicated , however Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, Instagram all store data in the US and I cant see UK users suddenly deleting their accounts and abandoning them on the discovery that they are not EU compliant, can ypu ?Interesting article:
Can I move my data to the EU before Google shifts it to the US?
Post-Brexit, Sean wants to keep his data protected by the EU’s GDPR rather than laxer US privacy lawswww.theguardian.com
Maybe not, but anything that might help folk to make such decisions must, at least, have some merit.Never knew it was so complicated , however Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, Instagram all store data in the US and I cant see UK users suddenly deleting their accounts and abandoning them on the discovery that they are not EU compliant, can ypu ?
Of course not, but the point is that it may be of come concern as the article points out:Never knew it was so complicated , however Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, Instagram all store data in the US and I cant see UK users suddenly deleting their accounts and abandoning them on the discovery that they are not EU compliant, can ypu ?
UK data is covered by the Data Protection Act 2018, which is the UK’s version of the EU’s GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation). One problem is that the UK may lower its data protection and privacy standards to US levels, along with our food and other standards, as part of a US trade deal. Another problem is that even if we maintain EU-level regulations, there is no guarantee that the US will observe them. Given Trump’s actions since taking the US presidency, it is hard to imagine that the situation has improved since Edward Snowden shocked us with his revelations.
Indeed, but the EU are being no better. Insisting the UK has to have a more restrictive set of requirements than other countries because it is physically closer by? That’s just as pathetic.
Although it's early, I think it'll be pretty hard to topple this from the top of the Stupidest Posts Of The Day listings. The UK has never been a 'servant taking orders,' and its negotiating clout is a whole lot smaller now that we're out of the union.EU wankers still haven’t got their bureaucratic heads around the fact that the U.K. is now a third party negotiating on equal terms rather than a servant taking orders.
not to mention the uk has a dearth of experienced negotiators.Although it's early, I think it'll be pretty hard to topple this from the top of the Stupidest Posts Of The Day listings. The UK has never been a 'servant taking orders,' and its negotiating clout is a whole lot smaller now that we're out of the union.
Based on what metric(s) do you make the claim that the EU & UK are negotiating on "equal terms"?EU wankers still haven’t got their bureaucratic heads around the fact that the U.K. is now a third party negotiating on equal terms rather than a servant taking orders.
EU wankers still haven’t got their bureaucratic heads around the fact that the U.K. is now a third party negotiating on equal terms rather than a servant taking orders.
Although it's early, I think it'll be pretty hard to topple this from the top of the Stupidest Posts Of The Day listings. The UK has never been a 'servant taking orders,' and its negotiating clout is a whole lot smaller now that we're out of the union.
EU population, 512 million. UK 70 million
EU gdp, 18.8 trillion, UK 2.8 trillion
The look on your face when sovereignty can’t buy you exclusive access priceless
And yet...Although it's early, I think it'll be pretty hard to topple this from the top of the Stupidest Posts Of The Day listings.
The "We'll walk away if there isn't enough progress" is BoZo grandstanding for a domestic audience and clearly it is working, give the man his due when it comes to uniting people behind slogans, he clearly has a gift for it.EU wankers still haven’t got their bureaucratic heads around the fact that the U.K. is now a third party negotiating on equal terms rather than a servant taking orders.
The "We'll walk away if there isn't enough progress" is BoZo grandstanding for a domestic audience and clearly it is working, give the man his due when it comes to uniting people behind slogans, he clearly has a gift for it.
Since he is the sole arbiter of this decision, not the people the tabloids or indeed even the Cabinet, it is a meaningless statement to whip up emotions.
And you don't think that's grandstanding as well? there is going to be a lot of this in the coming months from both sides as they get down to talking.