Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The big Brexit thread - news, updates and discussion

Then they would have passed through customs to get there. AZ have factories in the uk anyway.

Yes and the EU believe that the UK factories have been supplied in part with stuff from EU factories, which apparently would constitute a breach of contract.
 
Which is defined for the purposes of the section as including the UK, as you know.
For the purposes of the section which is defining a preference for the manufacturing to take place in certain locations. It means that if there is a choice between manufacturing in the EU/UK and manufacturing elewhere, then they should make best efforts to make it happen in the EU/UK.
 
a lesson that can be taken from this is that the eu lawyers aren't as good as they think they are, that the az lawyers aren't as good as they think they are, and that if the british government lawyers are as competent as the administration they serve then they are bloody awful.
 
AZ must have had potential brexit problems in mind when planning last year where to locate factories so the UK factories were obviously intended for the UK supply and belgium and dutch for the EU supply. It is unfortunate that the EU factories have had problems but there was no uk conspiracy.
 
AZ must have had potential brexit problems in mind when planning last year where to locate factories so the UK factories were obviously intended for the UK supply and belgium and dutch for the EU supply. It is unfortunate that the EU factories have had problems but there was no uk conspiracy.
Whatever the reasons, what is important - saving lives, getting us all out of lockdown ('us' meaning 'the world' here) - is getting lost. That's to nobody's credit.
 
tbh it's more likely it will come from their insurers' pockets

I guess so, assuming they can get such insurance. There have been major compensation payouts for vaccine injury in the past so how easy it would be to get insurance on a new vaccine for a new virus I have no idea.
 
AZ must have had potential brexit problems in mind when planning last year where to locate factories so the UK factories were obviously intended for the UK supply and belgium and dutch for the EU supply. It is unfortunate that the EU factories have had problems but there was no uk conspiracy.
I don't think there's a conspiracy involving the UK government. They can't even conspire properly among themselves.

The situation is that Astrazeneca are taking a decision which maximises their revenues and which will cost lives, all else being equal.

It's also not defensible as something they are forced or entitled to do under their contract with the EU. It's a breach of what they agreed to, and a choice.
 
Last edited:
I guess so, assuming they can get such insurance. There have been major compensation payouts for vaccine injury in the past so how easy it would be to get insurance on a new vaccine for a new virus I have no idea.
some years ago when i got a payout from a police force it came from their insurers. so i imagine other institutions have insurance for legal awards too.
 
Whatever the reasons, what is important - saving lives, getting us all out of lockdown ('us' meaning 'the world' here) - is getting lost. That's to nobody's credit.
Possibly, but the UK is now obliged to put its own citizens interests above those of the EU, just like the EU have said that they will 'stop at nothing to ensure the best outcome' for theirs. It seems that the EU is trying to treat the UK as if they were still an EU member and dictate what the UK should do with its vaccine supply. And they're doing this with a gun in their hand by suggesting that they'll impede EU exports of the vaccine to the UK. As you say, nobody is smelling of roses but the EU are playing the dirtier cards.
 
I don't think there's a conspiracy involving the UK government. They can't even conspire properly among themselves.

The situation is that Astrazeneca are taking a decision which maximises their revenues and which will cost lives, all else being equal.

It's also not defensible as something they are forced or entitled to do under their contract with the EU. It's a breach of what they agreed to, and a choice.
If only there was a way of taking the profit motive out of the pharmaceutical inustry
 
Possibly, but the UK is now obliged to put its own citizens interests above those of the EU, just like the EU have said that they will 'stop at nothing to ensure the best outcome' for theirs. It seems that the EU is trying to treat the UK as if they were still an EU member and dictate what the UK should do with its vaccine supply. And they're doing this with a gun in their hand by suggesting that they'll impede EU exports of the vaccine to the UK. As you say, nobody is smelling of roses but the EU are playing the dirtier cards.

Ta da!

That is aimed full-square at the UK, as SpookyFrank was saying yesterday.
 
Last edited:
Havent read the article but I think that order/agreement , from the comically named , “Inclusive Vaccine Alliance” was subsumed into the EU's procurement strategy after complaints from other EU states that they weren't part of the chosen few. The 'Inclusive ' four were all given seats on the seven member negotiating team for EU vaccine procurement.
 
Back
Top Bottom