littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
He was a notorious kidder. Never walked. Stood his ground once after he'd edged it to second slip.Don Bradman wasn't a cheat.
He was a notorious kidder. Never walked. Stood his ground once after he'd edged it to second slip.Don Bradman wasn't a cheat.
He was a notorious kidder. Never walked. Stood his ground once after he'd edged it to second slip.
Shades of Devon Malcolm and the "History Guys"?Smith came back out on adrenaline. But he couldn't hide the fear. He lasted 9 more balls, mostly pitched up by Woakes (including the one that got him) and scored 12 runs, 4 of them via cow corner, a most un-Smith-like stroke and 4 more through an edge. His arm hurt so much he admitted he couldn't play any forward defensives.
Bravery of the highest order, adding to his already undeniable status as the world's greatest batsman. But he's human. His shots after coming back showed that. A desperation to get on the Lords honours board (something else he has admitted). But you can't come back easily from what happened to him. Many lesser mortals (Broad) don't come back at all.
A spell to change the series from Archer? A spell from hell. Some of the most vicious fast bowling anyone can have seen.
Maybe Cummins bowling 10 short pitched deliveries to Archer (out of 11 balls) wasn't so wise eh?
There are many forms of cheating and sharp practice in all sports. Smith and the others were caught and punished for it. An initial frosty reception for them and some patomime villain booing - fair enough. Sustaining it when a bloke who's played superbly comes back out after a painful injury is just immature and rather pathetic in my view. Furthermore, I doubt the type of individuals who were booing would be too choosy if one of their own players managed to win this game for England by cheating.Don Bradman wasn't a cheat.
Yes, and given Australian history for not walking, that was absurd. Didn't like what Broad did much tbh, but I did like how he took the nasty stick he got. He went up in my estimation for that - being smashed in the face may have finished him as a batsman, but that concerted campaign against him didn't affect him in the slightest.Australian crowds booed Stuart Broad for
years after he refused to walk one time.
Tailenders isn't far behind.TMS is the best thing on the radio
Shipping Forecast?Tailenders isn't far behind.
Can we have Pavel Florin at an exhibition match please Grenades indeed
Hmmm. He's now looking like a replacement in another sense. Playing well here, the sub.Like for like replacement indeed.
The ArchersShipping Forecast?
Surely you've just answered your own objection to concussion substitutes? As a traditionalist I'd rather not have them, but ban them and you'll be encouraging people to solder on when they "really shouldn't", risking more serious damage.No surprise re Smith. I still don't agree with concussion subs, but there it is, they will get one. Labuschange's been making tons of runs for Glamorgan as well, so a decent sub.
Question has to be asked: who in that dressing room should have told Smith not to come back out to bat? It was obvious he wasn't right from the first ball he mowed through cow corner. He really shouldn't have come back out.
I had no problem with the English fans booing Smith at Edgbaston. He got caught cheating, it was his first test back after his suspension, and getting razzed by the crowd was completely to be expected. I don't even have any problem with them booing when he came out to bat at Lords. But booing a guy AFTER he's taken a 90-mph delivery to the head is pretty fucked up.Those people would have booed Don Bradman too
They're a national embarrassment TBH
As it turns out, no, although Labuschagne turned out to be a pretty decent substitute. I think the Aussies need to dump Warner. In addition to his woeful batting, he's having trouble catching the damn ball as well.Will Smith even be able to bat tomorrow? He's going to be sore as hell.
His bowling was completely fair. It was an amazing spell of fast bowling. I still don't get your last sentence, though. If you think that Archer wasn't going to bowl fast and fierce and short, no matter what happened to him at the crease, you're crazy.As to the fairness of Archer's bowling, absolutely 100% fair....
And yes, maybe when Archer next comes out to bat, they might want to think about pitching it up.
Lucky for England they didn't take your advice.No Smith. Surely 150 will be enough?
ETA- actually without Smith I think we have enough now.
Exactly. There's something substantively different about concussion, and some very good reasons why you want to have systems in place that mitigate the natural tendency of highly-competitive sportsmen and sports teams to keep playing when they're injured. That's why they have concussion protocols in rugby and American football as well.Surely you've just answered your own objection to concussion substitutes? As a traditionalist I'd rather not have them, but ban them and you'll be encouraging people to solder on when they "really shouldn't", risking more serious damage.
Surely you've just answered your own objection to concussion substitutes? As a traditionalist I'd rather not have them, but ban them and you'll be encouraging people to solder on when they "really shouldn't", risking more serious damage.
I can't see many, if any, changes for the third Test. Roy has predictably failed to come good as a Test opener in mostly bowler-friendly English conditions. You could argue whether he and one or two others might do better batting in a different position, or whether they should be there at all. Dom Sibley, one of the few obvious alternatives, made a duck for Warwickshire against Somerset in the first round of Championship matches for a month, despite his team scoring 303/4. James Vince made 47 batting at 3 for Hampshire at The Oval - he still seems to have a remarkable number of advocates among the ex-players in the press box despite never really convincing on previous evidence and being a rather poor understudy to Roy in the recent World Cup.
That would be consistent with England selection in recent years. A favoured player fails in his allotted role, so someone else gets dropped as a result. See also bowlers losing their place following a collective batting failure.James Taylor was watching at the Oval yesterday. Heard an ex intl say Roy will get the whole series but perhaps move to 3. Don't know if they think Denly would open instead with others dropping down or be dropped.
Squad just announced as being the same. I can't see Curran forcing his way in (he's not going to replace Roy is he) so presumably an unchanged team as well.