Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Ashes 2019

You first slagged off Roy's hundred and quoted the '34 played and missed' statistic in the same post that you admitted that you hadn't seen a ball of that day's play. What's with the prejudice? You've become the Katie Hopkins of the cricket form.

Cricviz are the same people as Winviz by the way. They gave England a 75% chance of winning the game yesterday morning.

I was critical of Burns, not Roy, and I watched the highlights so not sure where you're coming from? But you carry on being nasty when I've not laid a finger on you.
 
I was critical of Burns, not Roy, and I watched the highlights so not sure where you're coming from? But you carry on being nasty when I've not laid a finger on you.

I've checked back. First post admitted I'd been out and was looking forward to the highlights.

Started watching them. Burns looked, erm, edgy.

Third post, after watching all highlights, said I wasn't impressed.

But you carry on misquoting and being shitty. Don't let the facts get in the way of your nastiness Casual Observer
 
I've checked back. First post admitted I'd been out and was looking forward to the highlights.

Started watching them. Burns looked, erm, edgy.

Third post, after watching all highlights, said I wasn't impressed.

But you carry on misquoting and being shitty. Don't let the facts get in the way of your nastiness Casual Observer
Sorry, I meant Burns not Roy in my last post.

Burns doesn't look pretty, granted, but that shouldn't be a criteria on which an English opener playing in English conditions is judged. I felt the 5 posts from you criticising Burns' first innings hundred and the repeatedly quoting of the misleading '34 played and missed' statistic was excessive. Apart from the catch that wasn't given out and not reviewed (off Lyon), I don't think he nicked one.

The Katie Hopkins pop was probably a bit excessive as well so I apologise for that.
 
Eighty-five for five. For FIVE!

Irrespective of the match situation that's an appalling score :mad:

Edited to add: Ninety-seven for eight

er.. no ninety-seven for seven

:facepalm:
 
Last edited:
1465429164461.jpg
 
Really limp today. :( All started with Roy's brain fade. Amazing stat on tms this morning - Jason Roy's longest innings in first class cricket is 3.5 hours. He's never batted a full two sessions, ever, let alone a day. Did he think Lyon would give a shit if he hit him for six? Or two or three sixes? Naive. Bring in Sibley?

Moeen's gone. Got to be dropped. Bairstow also looks gone to me, though, and he probably won't be dropped.

It's not all doom and gloom, and who knows what would have happened if Anderson hadn't gone crook, but that's a really bad loss, the kind that will give Aus a huge boost.
 
wasn't it supposed to be raining all day? awful result.
Michael Fish has had a shocker, etc.
Vs exacerbating a calf strain from which we are presumably expecting him to recover from so he can play a further part in the series?

Unless we're not expecting recovery of course...
Might be the latter, but there was also the outside chance he could stand around until rain. Sadly, see above :(
 
I’m not bickering. I answered your question. Then referred back to where the original conversation started which was me claiming you can’t play and miss 34 times without being lucky, and that one day soon your luck will run out.

Oh look. Burns out, caught for bugger all.

How long he bat for that first innings? I wonder what the average is for attempted shots missed during a century knock.
 
I was critical of Burns, not Roy, and I watched the highlights so not sure where you're coming from? But you carry on being nasty when I've not laid a finger on you.

How long were these highlights you pondered over ?

Dunno how test form and a good 5 hours of play can be whittled down to highlights. Kind of defeats the object.
 
Urgh well there's the falling apart that always seems possible with England then. Too many players not really contributing anything in that match. Some decent performances too, and granted it's the nature of the game to some degree, but you can't have half a team of passengers.
 
Back
Top Bottom