Amazing all the moaning about Burns "looking ugly" at the crease. If you look like David Gower then get out you're accused of giving your wicket away with a careless shot, or lacking concentration or something. If you play and miss at least you're not going to give a catch. Steve Smith "looks ugly" but has 24 Test hundreds and an average of 61. Shiv Chanderpaul "looked ugly" but scored 30 Test hundreds at an average of over 50. I'm not getting carried away yet, I wouldn't be totally surprised if that turns out to be his only Test hundred (anyone remember Adam Lyth? Sam Robson?) but he's earned his chance by scoring 1,000 first class runs in all of the last five seasons, which I don't think anyone else has achieved. He's also achieved something that none of Alastair Cook, Marcus Trescothick, Mike Atherton or Alec Stewart managed - an Ashes century on home soil. I may have misheard but litening to TMS on the radio yesterday I'm sure it was stated that 6 of the last 8 Test centuries for England openers were scored by Alastair Cook and the other 2 by Keaton Jennings, and before that you have to go back to Lyth against NZ at Headingley in 2015. The cupboard is pretty bare right now if anyone wishes to replace Burns with someone else who "looks better".
I'll be pleasantly surprised if he can push on to 150 and beyond, mainly as batsmen who've batted all day for a hard earned ton invariably go swiftly the following morning, but he's given us the platform for Stokes, Bairstow, Ali and Woakes to hopefully secure enough of a lead to press for the win now.