Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

SWP expulsions and squabbles

I'm not saying rape and sexual assault are more likely to take place in Leninst organisations, but that there are more likely to be abuses of power to intimidate people from making allegations against leading figures and others covering up for them to preserve the authority of the leadership.
 
I'm not saying rape and sexual assault are more likely to take place in Leninst organisations, but that there are more likely to be abuses of power to intimidate people from making allegations against leading figures and others covering up for them to preserve the authority of the leadership.

I think there are eerie parallels with the cover up of the activities of child abuser Mark Trotter by the Labour Party in Hackney in the nineties. Right down to people being accused of factionalism and only exposing his activities for their own political gain.
 
Any chance of a cut and paste?
Yesterday a number of Portsmouth comrades who left the SWP over the past nine months met to discuss how we plan to organise in 2014. There were 10 people in the room while another 4 sent apologies. By unanimous vote we agreed to form the Portsmouth Socialist Network.

None of us have followed identical political trajectories over the past year. Some of us had left in March (a few joining the ISN), some had left over the course of the summer after participating in the Fault Lines blog, others stayed inside the SWP until December. Yet all of us remain revolutionaries. All of us remain committed to the idea of socialism from below. It is crystal clear that we need to be working together as a single group.

Constituting ourselves in this way enables us to invite people to something we put on, it means we can approach other groups and propose joint activity, it means we can go to picket lines and offer our collective solidarity. It doesn’t preclude people having membership of, for instance, the ISN or ACI, and it would allow us at some point in the future to affiliate to a new *national*organisation if we so wished.

We are all agreed that the formation of a new revolutionary organisation must be the central, strategic long-term goal. What that organisation should look like is another matter entirely. We will all, no doubt, have drawn a variety of organisational conclusions from our time within the SWP, and it would be surprising if we were to all agree on what a new organisation should look like. To which I say, “Good!” For too long we have been part of a party that treats the questioning of organisational form with a mixture of contempt and distrust. Let’s debate the options, experiment, learn from what works and what doesn’t.

But. At some stage *all* of the people who have left the SWP in the past twelve months (and, indeed, those who left earlier) need to sit in the same room and discuss in an honest and comradely way what we are going to do. There is something in the region of 700 people in search of a new political home. A political landscape that looks like an explosion of Scrabble tiles is unlikely to appeal to them or anyone else for that matter. The opportunity to forge something new is the one thing we can salvage from this miserable period but without a degree of unity and trust amongst those who have left we run the risk of many hundreds of activists drifting away from revolutionary socialism altogether.
 
I think that was outside the police station last night. Doesn't seem all that plausible. There were a few reports of a Daily Mail reporter getting shoved.
 
What's the implication of the tweet and her retweeting it anyway? It would have been alright if it was a bloke? I thought that LP's hierarchy of oppression meant that (presumably) black SWPers had every right to call a white woman racist and that white woman should be checking her privilege?
 
Statement from Kent IS:

A large number of members have resigned from the Socialist Workers Party in east Kent. We are leaving over the failure of the organisation's national leading bodies to handle the accusations of sexual predation against a former member and National Secretary in line with the party's politics on fighting women's oppression.

We are proud of our time in the party. Locally we have a history going back decades. We have been key activists in the fight against council house sell offs, closure of A&E departments and led many successful battles to drive the Nazi National Front and BNP from our streets. Further, we were at the centre of raising solidarity for the Kent Miners in their epic fight against Thatcher's Tories. We campaigned against the Poll Tax in the 1990's and the Bedroom Tax in 2013. Ten years ago we were among those that mobilised thousands of Kent people to march on the historic anti war demonstrations.

We are not leaving the field of battle, but will be fighting under a new banner.

We hope to launch, with others, a new organisation in east Kent that returns to the politics that once informed our old party. It will be based on the tradition of socialism from below, international solidarity and a liberating interpretation of Marxism that sees workers' revolution as the key to the emancipation of all mankind.
 
Read Ray M's resignation letter, then the Professor in the latest ISJ:

It is, nevertheless, to be hoped that the decisions of the national conference in mid-December (the third in 2013) will go far enough to address the criticisms made by the opposition faction to mark the beginning of reunification and reconciliation within the SWP.
 
Ray M's letter pretty much confirms every bad assumption about the SWP CC from within the CC -it's really rotten stuff - and pretty important reading I think for anyone that follows this issue. It's a real shame that he (and Hannah on the CC and the whole of the "soft" opposition in 2012) didn't take a firmer stand earlier - so in private he didn't like the expulsion of the Facebook Four, but he and most of the "opposition" didn't make their reinstatement a number on demand in the beginning. They didn't -or didn't want to - understand how bad the internal life of the SWP was.

If the party had simply expelled "Delta" at the beginning, instead of disciplining , expelling and driving out everyone else, the SWP would undoubtedly be in a much stronger position. So the leadership - with the willing support of the remaining members - have willingly gone on with this self harm. It makes you wonder for what. Obviously personal loyalty to "Delta" does count for some people, but in the end, he had to go anyway (although I suppose some of them dream of having him back). So I guess what they were fighting to preserve was just pure authoritarianism, a party that doesn't have to listen to annoying complaints from any members about sexual harassment or assault or anything else. It might be a much smaller party, with much less influence, but "leading" members can carry on "leading" what is left without worrying about anyone contradicting them.Very grim.
 
Does anyone here think that he will end up back in the party? I've noticed that he's started putting himself about a bit more on twitter over the last few weeks - perhaps a sign of rising confidence about the future?
 
If the party had simply expelled "Delta" at the beginning, instead of disciplining , expelling and driving out everyone else, the SWP would undoubtedly be in a much stronger position. So the leadership - with the willing support of the remaining members - have willingly gone on with this self harm. It makes you wonder for what. Obviously personal loyalty to "Delta" does count for some people, but in the end, he had to go anyway (although I suppose some of them dream of having him back).

Very much in agreement with most of what you say. However, as Michael Rosen and others have pointed out, the SWP should have suspended (rather than expelled) Delta at the very beginning while the best way of handling the accusations was decided on.

Why did they prefer to cover up for Delta? Personal loyalty may have been a factor, but more important would have been his key role in ousting Rees/German and what they probably perceived to be his indispensability in trade union work and the UAF.
 
Back
Top Bottom