bolshiebhoy
socialism leinster drink
no'to even suggest a woman might be wrong'. Care to clarify/explain that further?
no'to even suggest a woman might be wrong'. Care to clarify/explain that further?
Socialists in Labour are keen to expose the crimes of the leadership not justify them
I will. No fuck off.I'll re-phrase.
'To even suggest a woman might be wrong'.
care toPlease clarify/explain that further.
I spotted a comrade who – thanks to Twitter – I knew was critical of the SWP. I approached him and told him I was uncomfortable about the SWP presence and asked if he’d like to help me get rid of them. He didn’t need much persuading! We walked around and talked to a few other comrades about our plan. As soon as there were a few of us, we marched over to the SWP stall. I poured water over their filthy papers to make them unsellable, then my comrade tipped over their table. We then grabbed the placards and destroyed them.
Several trots came over to have a go but in all honesty, I wasn’t listening. I caught a few choice words; ‘unity… sectarianism… Nazis… Tory-led agenda’. Blah, blah, blah. None of us were bothered by what the trots had to say, we were buzzing! After the boring speeches given mostly by more swappies (seriously, they’ve infested all Sussex demos), we went on a march around campus that was more vibrant and energetic than the ones I’d been on recently.
Socialists in Labour are keen to expose the crimes of the leadership not justify them
remind me, what's 'D' in the phonetic alphabet?dreadful with a capital D.
Bollocks[/quote][revol68, post: 12776493, member: 13829"]Your membership justifies it.
You rat fuck!
Socialists in Labour are keen to expose the crimes of the leadership not justify them
But by definition your membership is effectively endorsing those self same criminals by wanting people to vote for them. How much longer will you and your pals demand we square a circle?
what's your problem?I will. No fuck off.
you. Picking one sentence out of a fairly long winded and reasonable response to others and asking me to elaborate on it. Fuck off.what's your problem?
Yep,Colin Wilson resigns. Wasn't he their main person writing on lgbt issues for years?
Now john Molyneux isColin Wilson resigns. Wasn't he their main person writing on lgbt issues for years?
I suppose it would be like the people staying in the SWP with Delta still on the CC and arguing that whilst he might be a rapist atleast they can act to put tabs on his raping.
Nigel Irritable said:Colin Wilson resigns. Wasn't he their main person writing on lgbt issues for years?
Pete Gillard said:I believe the SWP is no longer fit for purpose as a revolutionary organisation. I haven’t lost faith in the working class. I don’t believe that ‘the movements’ can bring socialism. I reject all the slurs the CC has promoted in attempting to discredit the SWP Opposition. In leaving the SWP, I will play my part in the process of building a new revolutionary socialist organisation, one which builds on the best of the International Socialist tradition. I fully expect to be working and to welcome working with SWP members in my union and in campaigning activities. The revolutionary left in Britain, as a whole, is weaker than it has been for decades. We need to work together.
Socialists in Labour are keen to expose the crimes of the leadership not justify them
How? By campaigning for and alongside war criminals?