DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
i wonder what's in the bottle?
if he rubs it three times lenin comes out and grants him no wishes
i wonder what's in the bottle?
Check your judge of good graphic design privilege there butchers.
decent choice of font, but the lack of proper leading is shocking, if rather ironic.Check your judge of good graphic design privilege there butchers.
if he rubs it three times lenin comes out and grants him no wishes
willie black makes him look a dick.Molyneux is an awful toady shit
the molyneux trotsky quote was massively embarrassing. even he looked embarrassed as it limped to an irrelevant conclusion.It's like a condensation of all the head-in-hands moments of the average Marxism.
I'd never noticed how big his ears are before.
yeah books are shit.Ah but hang on, One of the best things about Trotsky's History of the Russian Revolution for example, that paragon of Leninist history is the number of times the class teaches the party rather than the other way round as happens in stalinist history
yeah books are shit.
He looked tired and distracted (forgetting names). But then I don't think he ever imagined he'd be the one having to lead this charge, he's not really built for it. That said I thought he spoke cogently about the twin dangers of sectish vs adaptive behaviour and that the antis from the floor sounded far too wishy washy in reply. They reminded me of the same people who'd drift into branches in the old days, add a bit of colour and then throw a hissy fit about how stale and centrally controlled things were, then flounce off. There's something far too dilettantish about the folk behind uncles Ian and Pat.I have to say (through gritted teeth! ) I'm impressed the SWP put it up. for them it's a big concession to put public disagreements online.
OK, as I never tire pointing out to Apology Boy, radical change in the SWP's internal culture normally means aligning yourself with standard practice in other left groups but still for the SWP this is a bit of a departure.
That said listening to Callinicos rabbit on I cannot for the life of me understand how he's gotten away with this image of being 'one of Britain's foremost Marxist thinkers' for so long.
He looked tired and distracted (forgetting names). But then I don't think he ever imagined he'd be the one having to lead this charge, he's not really built for it. That said I thought he spoke cogently about the twin dangers of sectish vs adaptive behaviour and that the antis from the floor sounded far too wishy washy in reply. They reminded me of the same people who'd drift into branches in the old days, add a bit of colour and then throw a hissy fit about how stale and centrally controlled things were, then flounce off. There's something far too dilettantish about the folk behind uncles Ian and Pat.
There is a certain type yes, the dilettante just as there is the other type, the infamous 'hack'. Think the silent majority in the party always hated both but knew one was at least useful.You haven't been in a branch for two decades. Yet you know the fatal fault of the people they attract by the big hitters (round and round ye go)
the dilettante causes far less damage.There is a certain type yes, the dilettante just as there is the other type, the infamous 'hack'. Think the silent majority in the party always hated both but knew one was at least useful.
He looked tired and distracted (forgetting names). But then I don't think he ever imagined he'd be the one having to lead this charge, he's not really built for it. That said I thought he spoke cogently about the twin dangers of sectish vs adaptive behaviour and that the antis from the floor sounded far too wishy washy in reply. They reminded me of the same people who'd drift into branches in the old days, add a bit of colour and then throw a hissy fit about how stale and centrally controlled things were, then flounce off. There's something far too dilettantish about the folk behind uncles Ian and Pat.
why did he himself flounce?This is lovely. Wonderfully encapsulates a party culture where rigidity and conformism are the key values. Heads down, into the bitter wind, steely grimace, clutch-full of SW's under-arm, holding the line, the biggest revolutionary organization in Britain. Sounds perfectly awful. Why do you think these dilettantes flounced so soon Bolshie?
This is lovely. Wonderfully encapsulates a party culture where rigidity and conformism are the key values. Heads down, into the bitter wind, steely grimace, clutch-full of SW's under-arm, holding the line, the biggest revolutionary organization in Britain. Sounds perfectly awful. Why do you think these dilettantes flounced so soon Bolshie?
i think that's a bit out of order.View attachment 38214
Man alive that Irish guy was boring.
"We need, like, a revolutionary uhhhh party, because, you know fascism and ahhhh the unemployed."
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
Yes yes the party is a cult etc. The thing is many of those who flounced did so only so far as variuos real cults, the alphabet zoo of sects. I really, really don't recognise this picture of the swp or it's sister parties as conformist. The most common phrase between comrades was 'yes but'. People had a basic core of shared politics but debated constantly as to their application/development. There's a quote from Nigel Harris in Birchall's Cliff about leaving the party because it stopped having new ideas in the 80's. Did it or did people like Harris not just find the massive pressure to abandon the shared core of IS ideas increasingly harder to resist? If anything that pressure is probably even greater today.This is lovely. Wonderfully encapsulates a party culture where rigidity and conformism are the key values. Heads down, into the bitter wind, steely grimace, clutch-full of SW's under-arm, holding the line, the biggest revolutionary organization in Britain. Sounds perfectly awful. Why do you think these dilettantes flounced so soon Bolshie?
More of a tired shrug than a flounce.why did he himself flounce?
It is. Guy had some balls even to get up there in that athmosphere.i think that's a bit out of order.
soon it'll just be bolshie, a couple of aristocrats, a clown and a biter, with a sex case lurking about in the background. the swp and it's periphery. the true defenders of lenin.Listen to yourself. The question begging - did they fail the IS? One by one, group by group, leading member by leading member.