but you like a challengeAfter New Era, it's harder than ever to mock Russell Brand as a hypocrite
http://www.theguardian.com/commenti...han-ever-to-mock-russell-brand-as-a-hypocrite
Have you ever seen this?After New Era, it's harder than ever to mock Russell Brand as a hypocrite
http://www.theguardian.com/commenti...han-ever-to-mock-russell-brand-as-a-hypocrite
Ricky Tomlinson spent 2 years in prison for his principles prior to becoming a national celebrity. Not much of a comparison, is it?Yesterday's Grauniad has an article about another celebrity comedian who has endorsed a political position: Ricky Tomlinson who endorses the Scargill Labour Party:
http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2014/dec/27/ricky-tomlinson-interview-im-a-whingeing-scouser
He was once a member and even a candidate for the National Front in his youth. But he is living proof that people can change and nobody holds this against him. Fortunately, it is not the case that "once a fascist, always a fascist" but of "once a [something], not always a[something]".
After New Era, it's harder than ever to mock Russell Brand as a hypocrite
http://www.theguardian.com/commenti...han-ever-to-mock-russell-brand-as-a-hypocrite
Ricky Tomlinson spent 2 years in prison for his principles prior to becoming a national celebrity. Not much of a comparison, is it?
His memories of his National Front days do nevertheless help him to make sense of Ukip’s rise: “For everyone who’s been out of work for a couple of years, with no hope for a job, and then they see people coming in and working for less than the rate – it must make them angry, and if we pretend it doesn’t we’re kidding ourselves. You see where Nigel Farage is scoring – he’s playing on this. He’s absolutely playing on this. So you have got to talk about immigration, you can’t just attack someone because you disagree with what they say. And when firms advertise jobs in Poland and not here, that’s bang out of order. If there’s jobs available it should be available for everyone. And I don’t believe some of the stuff that people in this country won’t work. I won’t have that.”
A bit surprised at those who "like" this statement.[/QUOTE]{quote]And when firms advertise jobs in Poland and not here, that’s bang out of order. If there’s jobs available it should be available for everyone.
Why not tell us why you're surprised.A bit surprised at those who "like" this statement.And when firms advertise jobs in Poland and not here, that’s bang out of order. If there’s jobs available it should be available for everyone.
Yeah; presumably its OK to blacklist the workers of an entire country.Why not tell us why you're surprised.
Didn't realise there were so many members of SPEW on here.
Inadequate and rather cowardly reply.Didn't realise there were so many members of SPEW on here.
What's with the mealy-mouthed implication here? Just say what you're evidently thinking.Didn't realise there were so many members of SPEW on here.
I think he's trying to tell us he is a Harry Potter fan.What's with the mealy-mouthed implication here? Just say what you're evidently thinking.
No it's a reasoned accusatiuon of nationalism. I wouldn't have thought you were a racist.No reasoning at all then, just a mindless accusation of racism. Fuck off.
It doesn't matter what you think it means - what matters is what you were insinuating about posters on here who liked my post. Have the courage of your convictions - call them racists. Or maybe you could sprinkle some fairy dust on it and call them nationalists.I think it's a mealy-mouthed way of saying that jobs in Britain should go to workers in Britain not to workers from Poland.
You haven't offered any reasoning. All you've offered is a cheap smear and a terrible shocking misreading of a small quote - whilst managing to miss the reason behind it even being quoted.No it's a reasoned accusatiuon of nationalism. I wouldn't have thought you were a racist.
Well, quite. What a cuntish allegation to make.Which bit of 'jobs available for everyone' are you specifically interpreting as 'jobs for the British'? And why?
It's the sort of logic that justifies jim crow laws as being required to combat racial discrimination. It's that back to front. Or no irish no blacks no dogs on the grounds of anti-racism.Well, quite. What a cuntish allegation to make.