What a fucking ridiculous statement to make, that every single woman is treated perfectly. You sound about three years old, grow up.
i think there's a question of perspective here which feeds back into the original question though. comparatively, Muslim girls in Rochdale
are well looked after (as in, there are people looking out for them in the community in however patriarchal a form). the white girls who were preyed upon were not looked after at all, in many cases rejected even by their own families. this is one of the main reasons they were able to be abused.
alongside this there are ingrained attitudes within many Pakistani communities in the North West which encourage the idea that these girls are nothing more than 'sluts' who, because of their decadent Western lifestyles deserve anything that comes to them, which acts as a self-justification. Muslim girls deserve protecting and treating 'right' because they are worthy, non-Muslim girls are lower than dirt. these views are held by significant groups within the community and are not just relegated to the 'usual suspects' of boisterous young men, but also (as this grooming case shows) permeate some respected layers of the community (it should be noted that the community itself is encouraged in these ideas by general non-Muslim society at large, who constantly label these layers of girls as being trashy chav slags as well).
it's indicative of the strength of the above attitudes that for some, 'drinking' is considered a more serious religious crime than grooming underage girls. just pointing out to scoobydoo that the reason you're claiming these guys aren't Muslims bears no relation to the most serious of their crimes. it also doesn't pay any attention to the fact that these men were respected in their communities, regular mosque-goers and certainly not purged for their 'haram' habits. you can subjectively consider them whatever you want but the reality is that they were accepted by the Pakistani community in Rochdale and, as has been noted earlier in the thread, the depth of this gang goes far deeper than the 9 men who were convicted.
personally i also think it's a gross over-simplification to label this scandal an issue of paedophilia... i genuinely think the main question here is an utterly divided community in Rochdale where cultural/religious bullshit is being used to justify horrendous acts of sectarian abuse. i think most of these men would have been quite happy to be raping drugged up 20+ year olds too but for logistic reasons it was more convenient to pick on vulnerable teenagers. paedophilia is arguably a question of atomised perversion - whereas this was systematic.