It's possible, but it wouldn't really matter; the point I've been making for a while is that the impact was baked-in a long way back; as Falcon pointed out, with knowledge of the available envelope being wrong, it could be have been aborted at the top of the loop, but beyond that point, in the absence of more power becoming available, you're committed to where you're going.
FWIW there's a few videos of the Eurofighter experiencing a near miss (and not in the carefully planned sense) at Fairford in 2005:
I didn't want to use that as an example because the EF aerodynamics are deeply complex and it has manoeuvrability beyond traditional flight dynamics, often involving or very close to stall itself. Nonetheless it doesn't require detailed physics to tell you that if you haven't got the means to escape your trajectory in the space available then you're going to hit, just like if you can't brake hard and fast enough in a car.
Unfortunately I have to live under that plane doing it's stuff at Eastbourne every year. It's a truly terrifying killing machine capable of standing almost still vertically under full power scaring the hell out of small kids and pets. An evil piece of machinery if there ever was one, my hatred for all things military increases every time I see and hear it.
Why do we need such a terrible killing machine?