Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Missing Milly Dowler's voicemail "hacked by News of the World"

Surely not!

On a similar theme, here's an article from News Statesman in October 2000 on Fleet Street hypocrisy and general unwillingness to turn over its own, which mentions the coy references then emerging about Morgan & Hyde.

Good article, there - thanks. Interesting to note that it was K McKenzie who blabbed about this - did he have it in for the Moron? It certainly puts Ms Hyde's saintly reputation into somewhat sharp relief too, if you consider the amount of frantic backpeddling she's been doing of late. (Speculative thought: Did she ever hand over any Murdoch/NI etc dirt to Rusbridger as a "price" for joining the Graun back in the day?)
 
Interesting to note that it was K McKenzie who blabbed about this - did he have it in for the Moron?

Morgan was MacKenzie's protégé much as Brooks was Morgan's - I would have thought it was just a case of him assuming journalistic omerta on hacks' cockswinging (in terms of what is actually published) would mean he could have a cheeky dig.
 
Responsible for hacking Ulrika's phone and finding out she was shagging Sven?

Apologies if already answered, haven't got to end of thread yet.

The above is what GuidoFawkes tweeted yesterday and is on the blog, Piers supposedly knew Ulrika had been hacked.
 
BBC live text said:
1354: Remember David Cameron's startling claim at PMQs that he put up with things like reporters going through his bins because he wanted to maintain good relations with the media? Well, according to his official spokesman, it was Mirror Group reporters who did the dirty deed when Mr Cameron was in opposition...

It spreads further...

e2a: although I'm not sure that's on the same scale. Is it even illegal? Might just go down as "shit shitty hacks do".
 
Apologies if already answered, haven't got to end of thread yet.

The above is what GuidoFawkes tweeted yesterday and is on the blog, Piers supposedly knew Ulrika had been hacked.

If they're to be believed, Morgan was paid by the telegraph to do a hacking seminar for their journos in 2000. Sounds rather outlandish. Doesn't it?
 
Morgan was MacKenzie's protégé much as Brooks was Morgan's - I would have thought it was just a case of him assuming journalistic omerta on hacks' cockswinging (in terms of what is actually published) would mean he could have a cheeky dig.

Yeah, thinking about it, that sounds about right. Certainly the Moron's subsequent journalistic endeavours and personal style has more than a touch of the McKenzies to it.
 
Peston is now a shimmering orb of pale blue light hovering about four feet above his chair at the BBC Television Centre

"He is no longer Robert Peston, BBC business editor. His atoms are now woven into the very fabric of the universe. He is become pure news.

Meanwhile the few remaining sceptics tried to jam Peston's transmissions by wearing a plastic bucket on their head.

Tom Logan, a trainee accountant, said: "He only err gets all these err stories, because he err spent much of the err last 10 years with his err nose rammed straight up err Gordon Brown's err dirt box."

Robert Peston Transformed Into Pure Energy
 
C/o the Graun, a profile on the juddge chairing the phone hacking inquiry:

Lord Justice Leveson, who has been put in charge of the hastily-assembled inquiry into phone hacking, is a trusted senior judge who is currently chairman of the Sentencing Council, which draws up guidelines for the courts.
He was lead prosecutor in the case of Rose West, Britain's most prolific female serial killer ...
Leveson was educated at Oxford University and became a barrister in 1970, working out of chambers in Liverpool. He initially practised in northern England across a range of crime, personal injury and commercial work.
He was appointed Queen's Counsel in 1986 and began his climb up the judicial ladder, sitting as a recorder and then a deputy high court judge. As Sir Brian Leveson, he joined the appeal court in 2006.
He has already demonstrated his willingness to engage with broader public debates beyond the confines of the courts. Earlier this year he defended a district judge who had been severely criticised – by the prime minister among others – for imposing only a £50 fine on a man who burnt poppies during an Armistice Day event.
In an interview on BBC radio, Leveson explained: "[The judge] had to balance the insult caused to those who were respecting the two minutes' silence against the right which we all have to express ourselves freely … It depended on the evidence and what he heard."
On his appointment to the Sentencing Council in March 2010, Leveson said: "I am keen to look at ways in which the council can help to inform the public about the practice of sentencing in our courts. I am aware from personal experience that giving people the opportunity to explore and understand the way in which judges approach sentencing can significantly increase their confidence in the criminal justice system."
 
'hastily assembled inquiry' = Government shitting big bricks

Yup. Apparently according to the Graun, the judge in question was "outed" as being a soft-touch judge by The Sun - and here's what the Scum said of him:

Chairman Lord Justice Brian Leveson insisted "none of us are soft on crime" after introducing proposals to let 4,000 assault convicts a year go free rather than face jail.

Naturally the Sun will want Judge Leveson to bang the gavel for justice and impose the highest penalties possible.
 
if Sky withdraw their bid, they wont be able to submit another for 'at least six months' - the six months durng which it'd have been with the Competition Commission anyway
 
blimey, not unexpected though - just not possible at the moment - I'm sure Murdoch is planning a future bid though.

Oh, I think you can guarantee that, for sure. The Digger will wait a while, and then strike once more once he thinks the coast is (largely) clear and he can rely on HM Govt to ensure that his bid goes through next time.

Also: is it just me, or is it a very handy co-incidence for the BSkyB bid withdrawal to be leaked/announced just as the debate in the House of Commons was about to start? Nice way for Murdoch and Co to be seen to do the "right" thing.
 
Watson links News International to spooks:



Could be an awkward one for Telegraph Media Group papers to report on, given who were editing their daily and Sunday titles not-so-long-ago (particularly across the crucial mid-90s to mid-00s period), and their own relationships with the buggers & burglars.

I agree about the Telegraph titles being especially in the frame there, but the dailies and Sundays have historically maintained cordial relationships with the security services. It makes sense insofar as checking out certain information/sources of information.
 
There is no right thing they can do. All they can do is wait it out and fuck 'people' (i.e their ex-mates) up. Which they're going to do sharpish.
 
345192466.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom