Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Millwall fans conform with stereotype shocker ....

I'm not sure they've thought this through. Opposition players will still do it, and some Millwall fans will still boo.
 
I'm not sure they've thought this through. Opposition players will still do it, and some Millwall fans will still boo.
The day has to come when Millwall gets its act together, and the excuse and apologies stop. This could be sorted out with enough will. Ban the people who booed. Punish the club with points deductions. A time limit to root out the racism or the club gets kicked out of the league. Magically things would get better. Or they wouldn't and the most racist club in England would cease to exist. Either way it's a win.
 
The day has to come when Millwall gets its act together, and the excuse and apologies stop. This could be sorted out with enough will. Ban the people who booed. Punish the club with points deductions. A time limit to root out the racism or the club gets kicked out of the league. Magically things would get better. Or they wouldn't and the most racist club in England would cease to exist. Either way it's a win.

There's not a chance in hell that will happen, because of the 'plausible deniability' issue i.e. those who booed can claim that they don't disagree with the sentiment 'black lives matter', but they reject the political movement Black Lives Matter, because they reject its aims e.g. defunding police. If the club banned someone, he'd become a martyr, and probably sue and win, all of which would embolden other racists.

Similarly, that 'plausible deniability' would afford the club a defence against any disciplinary action by the FA.

It would've been better to have finished with the knee thing already, rather than give a hostage to fortune, and ending up here. Not least of all because it's become somewhat of an automatic gesture; it would've been better to replace it with more meaningful actions e.g. all players agree that, as soon as one of them hears a racist remark, they all - both teams - walk off the pitch, regardless of which club's supporters, or whether or not they're winning or losing. It wouldn't take that happening too many times before clubs, and, more importantly, other fans, put a stop to it.

I competely agree about clubs being punished for their fans' racist behaviour, though. I just don't think that booing the knee is the right battleground - not because I disagree in principle, but becuase it's doomed to fail.
 
There's not a chance in hell that will happen, because of the 'plausible deniability' issue i.e. those who booed can claim that they don't disagree with the sentiment 'black lives matter', but they reject the political movement Black Lives Matter, because they reject its aims e.g. defunding police. If the club banned someone, he'd become a martyr, and probably sue and win, all of which would embolden other racists.

Similarly, that 'plausible deniability' would afford the club a defence against any disciplinary action by the FA.

It would've been better to have finished with the knee thing already, rather than give a hostage to fortune, and ending up here. Not least of all because it's become somewhat of an automatic gesture; it would've been better to replace it with more meaningful actions e.g. all players agree that, as soon as one of them hears a racist remark, they all - both teams - walk off the pitch, regardless of which club's supporters, or whether or not they're winning or losing. It wouldn't take that happening too many times before clubs, and, more importantly, other fans, put a stop to it.

I competely agree about clubs being punished for their fans' racist behaviour, though. I just don't think that booing the knee is the right battleground - not because I disagree in principle, but becuase it's doomed to fail.

Over the years the club itself often seems to find an excuse for its fans, instead of squaring up to them, as has happened in this case. What are they worried about? It it just a loss of revenue from season tickets? This is a genuine question. I don't know the answer.

Re - the knee - maybe it's a good thing that it carries on - let's see who is a dickhead out in the open? Why do we have to modify our behaviour to appease the ignorant? This is getting a lot of attention - Millwall won't be happy at the amount of comment. It might even cause change at the club (might).
 
not sure what the answer is.

while i'd hope it's obvious i'm not in favour of racism and broadly in favour of challenging racism, at what point does something like this become "little more than good PR" (to quote les ferdinand) ?

snag is now that if any club stops it, or if the FA / EFL stops it, that's going to be seen by some racists as a victory, like the way some dickheads rushed to congratulate companies that didn't immediately add 'BLM' to stuff when it became a big thing a few months ago.

blargh.
 
not sure what the answer is.

while i'd hope it's obvious i'm not in favour of racism and broadly in favour of challenging racism, at what point does something like this become "little more than good PR" (to quote les ferdinand) ?

snag is now that if any club stops it, or if the FA / EFL stops it, that's going to be seen by some racists as a victory, like the way some dickheads rushed to congratulate companies that didn't immediately add 'BLM' to stuff when it became a big thing a few months ago.

blargh.

I suppose - but fuck the racists. Ultimately this as about principles, and they need facing down, regardless of any vistories that they might claim for themselves.
 
Over the years the club itself often seems to find an excuse for its fans, instead of squaring up to them, as has happened in this case. What are they worried about? It it just a loss of revenue from season tickets? This is a genuine question. I don't know the answer.

Re - the knee - maybe it's a good thing that it carries on - let's see who is a dickhead out in the open? Why do we have to modify our behaviour to appease the ignorant? This is getting a lot of attention - Millwall won't be happy at the amount of comment. It might even cause change at the club (might).

The club is clearly willing to tolerate it to a certain extent (though I'm sure they'd claim they are doing all they can); I suspect it's beacuse they don't want to piss off a sizeable and vocal section of their fans, not least of all becasue they need the money.

I'm not sure the 'value' in allowing dickheads to out themselves outweighs the cost of emboldening them (and others) to do this more and more.

I'm not proposing appeasement; my point was that it'd have been better to have replaced the knee with something more meaningful well before football found itself in this predictable bind.

I'd like to see players freezing out the club; going public en masse to say they'd not sign for the club until it sorts its act out.
 
Over the years the club itself often seems to find an excuse for its fans, instead of squaring up to them, as has happened in this case. What are they worried about? It it just a loss of revenue from season tickets? This is a genuine question. I don't know the answer.

Re - the knee - maybe it's a good thing that it carries on - let's see who is a dickhead out in the open? Why do we have to modify our behaviour to appease the ignorant? This is getting a lot of attention - Millwall won't be happy at the amount of comment. It might even cause change at the club (might).
I'm glad it's carried on at least until fans are back in stadiums. Feels like a bit of an empty gesture if there's nobody watching.
 
Well ...from the BBC ‘No boos after Millwall fans asked to respect QPR players who take the knee’
Wonder if O’Neil , Fox and Embery were flogging the Spectator outside the ground
 
Lead by example :’ PSG and Istanbul Basaksehir players have walked off the pitch after they have accused the 4th official of being racist. Football is changing.’ This is the correct response to racism.’ ( can’t cut and paste always from Twitter.)
Apparently the official is alleged to have called one of the Basaksehir coaches what was politely described in translation as ‘black guy ‘ but others have said was ‘negro’
 
4th official apparently said ‘this black guy’ when identifying a certain player or something. We’ve all heard people do that right? If the person is white their ethnicity isn’t mentioned.
 
There were lots of interviews with Millwall fans on the radio last night. We are not racist. We support the thought but not the politics.

Millwall fans these days are pussycats in comparison to the times I went to the den :)
 
36616926-0-image-a-5_1607472692860.jpg


(Source: as stated in image)

'Marxists' Ilias Chair (right) and Bright Osayi-Samuel (left) celebrate Queens Park Rangers' goal in yesterday's 1-1 draw against Millwall.

29573596-0-A_man_identified_as_a_far_right_protester_wa_safety_from_protest-a-54_1592242843613.jpg


Saturday 13 June 2020: Pro-Racism 'protestor' ex-Detective Constable (and reported Millwall "fanatic") Male, rescued by 'Marxists after telling other members of the public near the Royal Festival Hall "F*** Black Lives Matter".

"To boo across the top is an act of violent disrespect totally out of kilter with the gesture itself, a handshake met with a punch to the throat. Not to mention a pretty good way of keeping the gate numbers down for the foreseeable future in a borough where 47% of people are black British or other minority ethnic group ..."

Booing those that kneel is an act of violent disrespect, a handshake met by a punch
 
Shows why taking the knee is not at all some sort of empty PR gesture

no gesture could be considered empty after being sustained for so long and with all the historicism behind it. I know of someone quite high up in class war and that who see’s the knee thing as subjugation to the white power structure - which I agree with in parts - but it all came from Colin K refusing to stand for a stupid anthem. So if that’s the stance people adopt then who am I, or who is he, to deny or argue against that.
 

This article makes mention of bananas being thrown at black players at The Den thirty years ago. Monkey chants etc.

I was a regular fixture at The Den thirty years ago. Never ever saw this happen. No bananas. Never heard of it happening either. Is the writer confusing us with Chelsea?
 
The BNP made two appearances at the Den as I recollect. One time attempting to sell Spearhead in 1985, they got a kicking and had to be rescued by the police. Another in 1988 handing out hang the IRA leaflets and most threw the leaflets in their face.
 

This article makes mention of bananas being thrown at black players at The Den thirty years ago. Monkey chants etc.

I was a regular fixture at The Den thirty years ago. Never ever saw this happen. No bananas. Never heard of it happening either. Is the writer confusing us with Chelsea?

Thirty years ago? So, 1990.

That was when I was working at Hammersmith Council with a Millwall season ticket holder. Gentle giant, lefty, soft as shit, wouldn't harm a fly. Never forget him telling me of his pure embarrassment at his own club's fans who booed a young black guy out of the club. Quite literally, Millwall sold him on as his career was being halted by the abuse from the fans. He couldn't touch the ball without his own fans erupting in hate against him.

I've never forgotten that story (or my mate Colin).

So, with Colin in mind, who was born and bred around Millwall, not all Millwall fans are racist.

But fucking loads certainly were and still are.

Why whitewash it? What purpose is being served here?
 
Back
Top Bottom