Seriously though.
Whilst my local soi dissant anarchist group are busy tweeting "fuck TERFs" it's the fucking LibDems taking to the streets.
That's proper fucked up.
you're right, we should be reclaiming the streets from the yellow toriesSeriously though.
Whilst my local soi dissant anarchist group are busy tweeting "fuck TERFs" it's the fucking LibDems taking to the streets.
That's proper fucked up.
There's nothing stopping us. I think a street presence that said fuck the lot of them could make gains now. We could be planning for the Oct XR thing, we don't have to abide by their wet tactics, we never used to fall in line like that.
I do sometimes wonder if all these splits, throwing hands in the air and bemoaning that young people are doing it wrong is sometimes used as quite a convenient excuse for burnt out inactive middle aged anarchos to stay being burnt out inactive middle aged anarchos rather than going out and organising within (and hopefully outside of, or beyond) the constraints and cultures of political conditions as they currently exist. Because there doesn't seem to be much chance of changing anything if all we're doing is whinging and sniping at each other online.
Thing is, I'm pretty keen on meeting with/talking to/doing stuff with the local groups that according to Twitter are active very near to me. But my god the fuckers are elusive!
but as you say bookfair is fucking miles away and it's not cheap for people to have a weekend in london. will the usual calls for places for people to crash go out?On a serious note it was suggested that a "second day" could be more on a organisers conferance of sorts, taking stock of the situation at the time and with a wide variety of groups present do some solid headstratching about planning for the following year...
There is a lack of knowledge transferance going on for a variety of reasons
That could be true.
But when said burnt out inactive middle aged anarchos want to do something, try to to do something...
...how do the "young people" respond to us?
You didn't respond to the point about Bf2020 blocking posters on their sm for raising concerns/making points. I'll assume that you missed it rather than you're good with that, but care to respond to that point in particular?Top dog - Aside from bigotry, you can expect a wide range of Anarchist (and friendly) tendancies as alreayd shown by the groups who have requested a stall before we've even sent out invites. We're pro-activley involving various networks from across the board locally, nationally and internationally just as the LABC did a pretty solid job of doing. So I expect it to be much of the same.
but as you say bookfair is fucking miles away and it's not cheap for people to have a weekend in london. will the usual calls for places for people to crash go out?
I'm always up for discussions about this stuff, but do accept the problems with it being London based and not that accessible to people with limited time and/or income.
Wonder if there's any mileage in localities putting on discussions in the few months leading up to the Bookfair, that then somehow feed in to the London one, or address some of the same questions and issues, or something like that?
You didn't respond to the point about Bf2020 blocking posters on their sm for raising concerns/making points. I'll assume that you missed it rather than you're good with that, but care to respond to that point in particular?
It also seems to be Bookfair 2020 in all the info so far. Has the Anarchist bit been dropped?
We are distinctly Anarchist in nature, we have not used that name as a courtesy to LABC. Given we are already accused of a take over that seems the right move.
If they stated they didn't mind or had of endorsed we would os used the name. London Anarchist Bookfair, as far as I'm aware the organising collective has changed atleats once before in the 80's or something no?
Re; Invite lists, we're not making these public. sorry.
Re; Invite lists, we're not making these public. sorry.
If I was organising an event I doubt I’d feel obliged to post up a list of invited people or disinvited people to a hostile Internet forum tbh.
If I was organising an event I doubt I’d feel obliged to post up a list of invited people or disinvited people to a hostile Internet forum tbh.
Of course you wouldn't, nor would most people here.
The hoops that people are expecting Rhyddical to jump through on this thread are pretty shit.
There is a load of 'what about?' and 'what ifs', demands for x. y, z information. The organisers don't owe anyone here their undivided attention and answers to every sneery or unreasonable question they can come up with.
I doubt half the people here will even go to the bookfair tbh and are merely indulging their daily theoretical discussion fix.
Indeed.
It's probably not a great idea to use your invite list as proof of anything then.
Ah point of confusion.
The list on our website is one of groups that contacted us asking for a stall/workshop etc or who we've directly spoken to as part of our standard organising.
There form a diverse bunch, primarily Anarchistic.... thus I would think a reasonable response to the question I was asked.
Great effort ... Considering how many words get typed out everyday on the net I'm not sure it changes people's opinions all that much, but nonetheless good luck with it all.We've been HIGHLY tolerate of people attacking us and I've personally responded to literaly hundreds of comments across several threads.