Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

London Anarchist bookfair 2020

That, as has been pointed out to you numerous times, is bollocks.

They've refused stalls to groups and organizations that aren't anarchist, and have refused to ban people for pragmatic reasons (who to ban, on whose word, who enforces it, etc etc) as they have said in previous statements.

Tell me what Anarchist group were refusing a stall too or name an Anarchist we've banned. Like we've gone over this.


"If they are stuck on a transphobic rock then you have no business accepting the money - if you believe what you say, never mind claiming it and demanding/asking for more."

I don't think LABC are transphobic! I think their neutral platform and solidarity (and to my understanding given the statements/tweets from the time, individuals friendship with) people who are transphobic is an issue.

I guess the issue here is whether you see the london bookfair kitty has some kind private holding or shared resource.... If the LABC is a company or somesuch then the money is theirs and they can buy themselves something nice for all their work... but I think everyone (including them) is of the mind that is is "for bookfairs"... we asked if they wanted to give it to a bookfair, they said yes/no sorta... and we said, ok, maybe send the rest to some other cool stuff instead of leaving it about for a bookfair that allows transphobes (something which no doubt, will never happen again).

It's pretty simple and chill if your starting position isn't "2020 are just after drama coiz I don't like them"... we don't want any drama.

The only ACTUAL drama here is from people who want non-anarchist transphobes to have a space at a trans inclusive anarchist event.
 
Tell me what Anarchist group were refusing a stall too or name an Anarchist we've banned. Like we've gone over this.


"If they are stuck on a transphobic rock then you have no business accepting the money - if you believe what you say, never mind claiming it and demanding/asking for more."

I don't think LABC are transphobic! I think their neutral platform and solidarity (and to my understanding given the statements/tweets from the time, individuals friendship with) people who are transphobic is an issue.
In the current climete and context saying that "Still tho clearly some are stuck on a transphobe support rock which they intend to die on," is 100% calling them transphobic quite publicly and i think you damn well know this.
 
In the current climete and context saying that "Still tho clearly some are stuck on a transphobe support rock which they intend to die on," is 100% calling them transphobic quite publicly and i think you damn well know this.

Hmmm.

Seems some people have been complaining that people get branded as transphobes on spurious grounds. You seem to be in the camp who complains about that as a thing which is happening a lot and is wrong...

What exactly are you doing here?

Cos it looks like you’re trying to take one statement and turn it into another, doing exactly what your ilk have been crying victimhood over.
 
Should have added in this quote to make it clear what my previous post referred to.

(I’ll get the hang of multi quotes eventually.)


I don't think LABC are transphobic! I think their neutral platform and solidarity (and to my understanding given the statements/tweets from the time, individuals friendship with) people who are transphobic is an issue.
 
"Still tho clearly some are stuck on a transphobe support rock which they intend to die on,"

&

I don't think LABC are transphobic! I think their neutral platform and solidarity (and to my understanding given the statements/tweets from the time, individuals friendship with) people who are transphobic is an issue.

Is there a difference between these two posts? Does the second one supercede the first, reject the first? Because the first very clearly says - bearing in mind current climate and context - that the old group are transpobic. It's not even a dog whistle - it's there. So why is the social media face of the new bookfair saying this? If you're saying they are consistent then i can't help you.
 
Last edited:
As for people of my ilk, i'm with smokedout and think there is space to turn anarchist guns on the identity politics nonsense of all sides here, starting, but not finishing, with the radical feminists, and onto their mirror image. Then we'd have a useful anarchist bookfair.
 
Last edited:
... there is space to turn anarchist guns on the identity politics nonsense of all sides here, starting, but not finishing with the radical feminists, and onto their mirror image.

What would that look like in practice, though, in the context of organising a bookfair?
 
It looks like the nuance between “rabid transphobic campaigner” and “friends with transphobic campaigner & supporting them despite not agreeing with them on this issue” is the one you’re seeking to eradicate.

I’m wondering why you’d want to do this.
 
It looks like the nuance between “rabid transphobic campaigner” and “friends with transphobic campaigner & supporting them despite not agreeing with them on this issue” is the one you’re seeking to eradicate.
I'm trying to find which is the real position of the new organisers here. That you can't say or even admit that the two i quoted are a bit different is telling. Fall in line soldier.
 
What would that look like in practice, though, in the context of organising a bookfair?
I wasn't speaking about organising the bookfair on that basis but in response to the oh so accurate characterisation of people of my ilk by pvt nyxx. If a fair was organised on that basis though then i expect it would be very sparsely attended with more people protesting outside than going in and a handful of stalls. That's the state we've allowed ourselfs to get in i'm afraid.
 
What would that look like in practice, though, in the context of organising a bookfair?

Yeah, the Bookfair is to a large extent the result of the state of the anarchist movement and what groups and people constitute that. That the Bookfair becomes a supermarket of campaigns and issues and identity politics is partly a reflection of what's going on with anarchism more generally.
 
Tell me what Anarchist group were refusing a stall too or name an Anarchist we've banned. Like we've gone over this.

One or other of us is misunderstanding what the other has written.

You seemed to be suggesting that the LABC collective were sticking to the 'banning things is not anarchist' line. Which they never did. They decided not to ban people on pragmatic lines, not political ones.
 
One or other of us is misunderstanding what the other has written.

You seemed to be suggesting that the LABC collective were sticking to the 'banning things is not anarchist' line. Which they never did. They decided not to ban people on pragmatic lines, not political ones.

It's hard not to see parallels between the ins and outs of Brexit and the ins and outs of a Book fair.

Thank God we are not trying to put a revolution together.
 
It's pretty simple and chill if your starting position isn't "2020 are just after drama coiz I don't like them"... we don't want any drama.

The only ACTUAL drama here is from people who want non-anarchist transphobes to have a space at a trans inclusive anarchist event.

You have lost my sympathy/ empathy. Your post is a complete crock of shite. Horrible stuff. Weird mix of falseness, passive aggressiveness and general "bad air". I am sure you will walk into some wank middle management job in a charidee in a few years and fit right in. Nasty.
 
i believe it's a mockery of the appropriation of foreign linguistic stylings popularised by activists such as 'them Duke Boys' and Gwen Stefani m'lud.

I think you've missed something. It seemed to me that it was linking the LAFN language (holler) to the "y'all" we saw earlier in this thread.
 
Are you in the LABC?

If I'm wrong and ignorant correct me comrade. I'm all ears, tho your "no suprise there" seems that you already have your mind set.

On a personal level I would like nothing more that for you the explain the reasoning behind the email sent, the seemingly contrary response of no endorsement but a donation and the refusal to pass on the social media which currently serves LABC absolutely no use. I'm not speaking out of any spite but simply responding to the information available and from what I'm told by involved comrades.

- yes but on here in a personal capacity. The decision to offer the money was easy quick and unanimous. So there you go. We said in 2017 that we would not be criticising from the sidelines any attempts to organise a bookfair in London but I don't think that means any of us have to let this sort of gossip and innuendo either from you or your "involved comrades" ( who are not involved in LABC) go unanswered.

As to the rest of it- read the full reply we sent back in August rather than the excerpts you put on the website. LABC will be responding to the statement that was put out yesterday directly.

One final thing though- unlike butchersapron I don't see a "declaration of war", i don't think LABC see it like that and I hope your collective aren't stupid enough to intend it as such.
 
Rhyddical, tbh it's hard to see your charm offensive on this thread as credible when on the Bf2020s social media, numerous posters find themselves blocked for putting entirely legitimate questions or responses, not dissimilar in tone or content to many posts on here in fact. Doesn't exactly inspire confidence those same personnel are willing to or capable of delivering a pluralistic event, thats welcoming and representative of all strands the movement, does it?
 
Last edited:
- yes but on here in a personal capacity. The decision to offer the money was easy quick and unanimous. So there you go. We said in 2017 that we would not be criticising from the sidelines any attempts to organise a bookfair in London but I don't think that means any of us have to let this sort of gossip and innuendo either from you or your "involved comrades" ( who are not involved in LABC) go unanswered.

Glad to know some more. Thank you.

We didn't include the entire statement as we were concerned about accusations of harming your privacy, We've asked a couple of times now but If you'd like us to uinclude thhe full statement happy to.

I don't think the LABC is out for war in the slightest, I think you're stuck in a difficult position due to A: wanting a bookfair and B: not wanting it to be no transphobia. The reality is (as far as I'm aware) some of the collective are friendly with people I/we would call transphobic and have a political neutrality/ no banning philosophy that is at odd with the wider Anarchist movement (atleast every other Anarchist bookfair and larger body)... so rock and hard place. Your own statements/commentry after 2017 and the message sent out earlier in this year make those positions quite clear and anything but innuendo.

If I'm being truly honest and slightly against myself here I think now that there is a "no Transphobia Bookfair", it opens up a window for there to be a Bookfair which pro-activley takes on these issues in the way everyone is pissed off that we wont.

Has the LABC thought about running such a bookfair in the light of changes? Clearly given the attempt earlier in the year there is drive too?

I can't speak for the rest of the collective but there has been informal chat about not standing in the way of fringe events nor events Gender Critical folk put on and such and even if you guys didn't feel like holding a bookfair,and certainly not assuming your personal politics perhaps providing a symbiotic event of that nature would appease everyone and tick everyones boxes?

Truly I think that is something you all want to consider and I would rather hope we could talk about as comrades, I'm back in London on the 12th next month If you / LABC folk would actually like a sit down and a chat about this and other issues over a pint sure a couple of us would be happy to meet up and air-clear and discuss such a thing without it being antagonistic?

At the end of the day here, the one thing we do all agree on is that we're supposed to be getting on with some Anarchy and forwarding a revolution... would really love to focus on that and make the next step[s positive ones despite our differances.

Re other questions....

Top dog - Aside from bigotry, you can expect a wide range of Anarchist (and friendly) tendancies as alreayd shown by the groups who have requested a stall before we've even sent out invites. We're pro-activley involving various networks from across the board locally, nationally and internationally just as the LABC did a pretty solid job of doing. So I expect it to be much of the same.

LynnDoyleCooper -
The entire point of contention here is where Transphobes should be given a platform / place to debate during Bookfair 2020. I've given a pretty solid definition of Transphobia here and I havn't got time to be sealioned into scrolling through 24 pages of bickering. However you're comment abou the bookfair being a "supermarket of ..." is an interesting one. I think one of the issues between Anarchists here is the concern that because we have a no-transphobia policy that we are a slip into idpol and such. We arn't, We are just a differant body of Class Struggle Anarchists making a bookfair. Comrades are concerned because they don't know what that will look like and given that so much of the conversation has been about Trans issues with a crotchy dude think that it's going to be like X. Perhaps we would do well to pen a more positive statement on "The vision" to better project what we aim to put on.

Kenny G - I'm truly not trying to "win" people, this is less a debate than a sharing of information. Mind you, like every other human, sometimes I'm in a bad way and type without thinking, tho I agree with my points the way I put them across is a bit shirty to say the least. In part again I blame the the sheer tirade of bullshit we take constantly across several platforms and reading people defending those we've blocked is disheartening. The only people we have blocked have been those spewing outright bigotry of the kind even those who have a more narrow sense of Transphobia would agree cross a line, it's... a weight if you get me.

Butchersapron - I think there is a differance between being transphobic and taking a stand in support of people being accused of transphobia. Is that any clearer for you?
 
Last edited:
Should add...

Folks, I'm just here on a personal capacity and if I'm shirty, I'm shirty. Everyone has a bad day and I'm not here to talk for the collective or keep up appearances. Any aggyness born from this thread can be directed to me as a person like but yeah, can't always be having a shiny day can we ;p

I do actually trully hope over the next year we can find a better way of addressing a shocking "no Transphobia" at an event and actually have a starting position of "we're all fecking comrades" rather than just have this pointless bickering over and over again.
 
Last edited:
what do you think the @ movement should be tearing itself apart over instead?

Love.

378330.bin
 
Back
Top Bottom