Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Letzgo hunting paedos

Hmm ... so a tax-avoiding CEO is lured to a rendezvous with an apparently hot-to-trot HMRC executive he met on an internet chat room specialising in tax avoidance, which turns out to be a bunch of guys in black balaclavas who beat him shot-filled lengths of garden hose before tarring and feathering him then calling the Guardian or the Independent to name and shame him?

There are many things to like about this plan ... but a few details in need of refinement still.
 
Last edited:
Why would you even talk to a 17 year old when youre 32.

Why did anyone here ever engage with frogwoman, Manda, Nemo, Emilie, dwen, Lord Camomile, red rose (and any number of others who at the time might have been south of majority) on the u75 boards or in the u75 chatroom?

Oh, that's right, because personality, intelligence, wit and rapport aren't just doled out at age 18. Plus talking is not necessarily the gateway to noncery.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, tax evaders are a better target for ire than those who expose paedophiles. As are paedophiles.

Reading this thread though, and the related linked articles, do you really think these people have a primary motive of protecting kids?
 
You're actually asking me to name someone more worthy of ire than someone who tries to expose paedophiles? Ok, here's one: Gary Glitter.

Now what?
You want people to go hunting gary glitter?

you said:
I'll do you a deal; I'll name them after you make your point clearly/explain your point I have missed?

Name them.
 
You're actually asking me to name someone more worthy of ire than someone who tries to expose paedophiles? Ok, here's one: Gary Glitter.

Now what?
I'm asking you to do what you said that you would. Now do it. You set conditions, i met them. Do it.
 
Are you kidding? A sexist joke from an anarchist with a cleaner? Point missing. Let's do that after you, as you promised, name names.

Two points: first, I don't have a cleaner (I did once, but accept it was a mistake - we haven't all been blessed with doctrinal purity since birth); secondly, I didn't tell a sexist joke, merely referenced it.

You want names of people worthy of ire? Ok: Cameron, Clegg, Milliband.

Now what?
 
I'm not entirely sure why most of the copycats, or at least the ones most publicised by the press, also sprung up in the same geographical area (my area).

In any case the movements certainly ended up on the back foot after that suicide, even with some remaining unapologetic. And to make matters worse the internet aspect made it easy for some supporters to abuse relatives of the deceased. Apologies for the Daily Mail link:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ters-Claire-Emma-Harris-criticising-them.html
 
Lots of attempts at point scoring on this thread. No great shock for the board as a whole, but this time it's essentially on the back of child abuse. Some people might want to have a look at what they've become.
 
Delicious ironing.

one post citing something doesn't equate with the several it cites, or joining in with the pedant sniping. If it did then even fewer would would ever cite stuff for fear of being seen as part of the general morass. But reading the recent stuff a morass is what it is in any case. WTF has this place become?
 
Back
Top Bottom