Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Lambeth Council Watch - news and updates about the 'co-operative' council

Someone told me yesterday that Lambeth don't own any of their own buildings any more. Is that true?

They still own International House behind the Brixton Rec. They are planning to dispose of it in long term. Which I object to. Its presently being used as a temporary affordable workspace. I think it should stay as that.
 
They still own International House behind the Brixton Rec. They are planning to dispose of it in long term. Which I object to. Its presently being used as a temporary affordable workspace. I think it should stay as that.
I just love that every capitalist investor in the world has decided that the best short, medium and long term investment you can make is property, and the canny entrepreneurs at Lambeth Council have decided...to sell everything. The stupidity is awe-inspiring.
 
I just love that every capitalist investor in the world has decided that the best short, medium and long term investment you can make is property, and the canny entrepreneurs at Lambeth Council have decided...to sell everything. The stupidity is awe-inspiring.

Glad you are saying this.

Repeatedly at consultation meetings with Council I've said they should stop selling off assets they have. Land and buildings. As this is only leverage they have over future development in Lambeth.

For this I'm considered not "sensible". This was actually said to me.
 
What actually are the mechanics of these petitions? Has anyone here looked into the law or been involved in similar attempts before? Because presumably if possible Lambeth Labour/Council will try and discount any third party website petition with a handwave if they can
 
Jack Hopkins has announced he's standing down as Council leader and Labour group leader. He has not mentioned anything about standing down as a councillor, but I suspect he won't stand for re-election next year. He initially wasn't for 2018 either
 
Jack Hopkins has announced he's standing down as Council leader and Labour group leader. He has not mentioned anything about standing down as a councillor, but I suspect he won't stand for re-election next year. He initially wasn't for 2018 either
Pretty sure this eulogy won't be going in his scrapbook :D


 
Looking at the One Lambeth petition, it's had 282 signatories since it started in early April. Whilst I appreciate these things are hard work, that to me demonstrates that it either isn't a popular cause or they are not doing a good job of pushing it out.

Now the elections and pandemic may explain that, but they, or someone, are going to have to somehow step up the campaign if it's going to go anywhere.
 
Looking at the One Lambeth petition, it's had 282 signatories since it started in early April. Whilst I appreciate these things are hard work, that to me demonstrates that it either isn't a popular cause or they are not doing a good job of pushing it out.

Now the elections and pandemic may explain that, but they, or someone, are going to have to somehow step up the campaign if it's going to go anywhere.
I would have thought the only way to get a referendum lik tht in Lambeth is to completely separate the referendum issue from the LTN issue.
My impression is that OneLambeth sprung from LTN situation - and their espousal of committee local government is one string to their bow, made up of many other arguments about injustices, ineffectiveness at achieving the goal, discrimination etc etc.

If we had a vote on the committee system vs cabinet dictat I would like it to be a pure choice.
 
Yeah that's my inclination too. If it's run by One Lambeth then it's always going to be tainted. Which is fine if OL get the signatures anyway. But if it is the start of the process then it might be better to create a wider group and if they want to get involved with it they join.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CH1
In Assembly news, Labour wasn't happy with the division of the committee chair roles and so withdrew from negotiations, so the Greens, Cons and Libs divided them up without them. I know almost nothing about the Assembly, like most people I suspect, but I believe most years the parties have an arrangement - not always with all of the parties.

Anyway, Labour's many Lambeth and London people spent the morning on Twitter claiming it was the Coalition Mk2 but with the Greens now. The Greens/Cons/Libs later gave their version of events and said the proposal put to Labour had been 5 for them, 4 for the Tories, 1 each for the Greens and Lib Dems for the first year.

Presumably Labour wanted more chair roles? But given they have 11/25 seats, that seems a bit off.
 
In Assembly news, Labour wasn't happy with the division of the committee chair roles and so withdrew from negotiations, so the Greens, Cons and Libs divided them up without them. I know almost nothing about the Assembly, like most people I suspect, but I believe most years the parties have an arrangement - not always with all of the parties.

Anyway, Labour's many Lambeth and London people spent the morning on Twitter claiming it was the Coalition Mk2 but with the Greens now. The Greens/Cons/Libs later gave their version of events and said the proposal put to Labour had been 5 for them, 4 for the Tories, 1 each for the Greens and Lib Dems for the first year.

Presumably Labour wanted more chair roles? But given they have 11/25 seats, that seems a bit off.
Does the assembly have any powers?
I sometimes watch Mayor's Question Time on BBC Parliament.
It is like a slow-moving and sometimes more acrimonious PMQs.
Sound and fury signifying nothing? - Macbeth apparently.
 
Does the assembly have any powers?
I sometimes watch Mayor's Question Time on BBC Parliament.
It is like a slow-moving and sometimes more acrimonious PMQs.
Sound and fury signifying nothing? - Macbeth apparently.

Yeah well that is the question isn't it - who knows what their powers are!
 
  • Like
Reactions: CH1
Ok the Greens have said on Twitter today that Labour was insistent on getting the transportation chair role and the Greens wanted it too. Possibly due to fair of scrutiny on Silverton/Crossrail and other TfL issues.

Pidgeon got the role but I believe she had it before so presumably knows what she's doing
 
  • Like
Reactions: CH1
In Assembly news, Labour wasn't happy with the division of the committee chair roles and so withdrew from negotiations, so the Greens, Cons and Libs divided them up without them. I know almost nothing about the Assembly, like most people I suspect, but I believe most years the parties have an arrangement - not always with all of the parties.

Anyway, Labour's many Lambeth and London people spent the morning on Twitter claiming it was the Coalition Mk2 but with the Greens now. The Greens/Cons/Libs later gave their version of events and said the proposal put to Labour had been 5 for them, 4 for the Tories, 1 each for the Greens and Lib Dems for the first year.

Presumably Labour wanted more chair roles? But given they have 11/25 seats, that seems a bit off.

I saw that as well. Labour trying to make out this was a coalition. When it isn't.

My take on it is that opposition parties wanted more scrutiny of Labour Mayor decisions in assembly.

Which means in practice getting Chairs of the committees.

So I don't buy Labour argument that this is a coalition.

I think more scrutiny is a good thing.
 
Huh, well this is a bit of a surprise. I hadn't heard any rumours about why he quit so was wondering if there was anything more to it or if it was him just moving on like he planned in 2018


To anyone who knows Jack Hopkins's nickname, this can't come as a surprise.
 
Huh, well this is a bit of a surprise. I hadn't heard any rumours about why he quit so was wondering if there was anything more to it or if it was him just moving on like he planned in 2018

I'm gobsmacked actually. And I don't know Jack Hopkins or his nickname.

If you look at the bottom of that Guardian article there is an affinity tree to find similar articles.
Click on "Sexual harassment" and literally pages upon pages come up.

I myself was greatly disturbed at the enormous coverage given in the Guardian exclusive about Noel Clarke. Tampering with one's memories of Dr Who must come close to misbehaviour in church to some.

I guess what I'm questioning here is the new role the Guardian has assumed as the moral guardian or spokespaper for the Me Too movement.

Obviously we don't know what will happen in the case of Jack Hopkins - but we do know what has happened to Alex Salmond - now reduced to a chat show host on Russia Today, despite being cleared of all charges.

I think Brixton House ought to consider a spectacular opening revival - "The Crucible".

Meanwhile here is the Daily Telegraph today on hugging
Hugging hour - Blower.jpg
 
Can't say I'd be sad NOT to see Councillor Hopkins assisting in the mayor's office, given his past record on how to improve life for his constituents. We're already dealing with a mayor's office who seem to pass any old planning applications, only to have them recalled and reconsidered. Hardly instills confidence.
 
Can't say I'd be sad NOT to see Councillor Hopkins assisting in the mayor's office, given his past record on how to improve life for his constituents. We're already dealing with a mayor's office who seem to pass any old planning applications, only to have them recalled and reconsidered. Hardly instills confidence.
Fuck Jack Hopkins and his arrogant Blairite, property developer agenda.
 
Back
Top Bottom