Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Justifications for the abolition of the Monarchy in the UK

An occasional series

In an effort to counter " them tourists is money" tropes that allow the craven lickspittles to wave flags, clutch their pearls and defend the monarchy, here is an opportunity to provide some reasons to abolish the Monarchy.

Newcastle lecturer claims Princess Eugenie was rejected | Daily Mail Online

No need to click on the DM link & I have corrupted the .html suffix above, but here is the C&P extract

Princess Eugenie was initially rejected by Newcastle University and then given a place because of who she was, it was claimed.
Her application was allegedly dismissed as ‘not good enough’ by an admissions officer who hadn’t realised the applicant was a member of the royal family.
When the ‘horrified’ university authorities realised what had happened they offered the Duke and Duchess of York’s daughter a place on an alternative degree course.
The allegations were made by Dr Martin Farr, a senior history lecturer at Newcastle University, in a speech to the anti-monarchist campaign group Republic’s annual convention in the city.
Eugenie ended up doing a combined BA honours degree in English literature, history of art and politics at Newcastle and graduated at the end of her three-year course in 2012 with a 2:1. The comments by Dr Farr imply that she was given special treatment to get her into the university for PR purposes.
Speaking to an audience in favour of abolishing the monarchy, Dr Farr said his information had come from a colleague who he didn’t name.
He said the royal VIP was rejected for a degree in English literature before being found a place on the apparently less competitive combined degree when her identity came to light.
Dr Farr said: ‘We had at Newcastle University one of the Queen’s granddaughters, Princess Eugenie.
‘And a friend of mine who is Italian was the admissions officer for BA English literature and received one application for the undergraduate degree that was not good enough and so discarded it.’

Dr Martin Farr, a senior history lecturer at Newcastle University, said her application was dismissed as ‘not good enough’ by an admissions officer who hadn’t realised the applicant was a member of the royal family
When the ‘horrified’ university authorities realised what had happened they offered the Duke and Duchess of York’s daughter a place on an alternative degree course (pictured is Newcastle University)
Dr Farr said ‘being Italian’ the admissions officer ‘had not noticed that Princess Eugenie of York from Sandringham may have had more significance for the institution than another applicant’.
He added: ‘Apparently the university was horrified that she had been rejected before she was offered a place with us for another degree.’


According to the university’s website the entry requirements for next year’s intake studying English literature are likely to be AAA-AAB, and for those doing a combined honours course of the type Eugenie studied they are put as AAB.


Eugenie, now 27, went to university on the back of three good A-levels at Marlborough College. She attained an A in each of English and art and a B in history of art"
 
Is there a member of the royal family that did not get preferential treatment? Their educational 'journeys' only serve to illustrate the distinctly non meritocratic nature of our education system and the fact that throwing masses of resources at a particular pupil does not always guarantee results. Art history appears to be a popular A level choice for those with art history on the walls of their living room/s.
 
play soldier for a few years, set up a really good charity close to your heart (and wouldn't we al like the opportunity to address in some way that specific evil of reality that for whatever reason is close to our thoughts?). Then endless rounds of hobnobbing with the global elite, suadi arms deal and going slowly more nutty and eccentric as you wait for your turn to be on the coinage.
 
Given she got a 2.1 it doesn't seem she was that awful.

Speaking to an audience in favour of abolishing the monarchy, Dr Farr said his information had come from a colleague who he didn’t name.

No agenda there then.

I'm pretty agnonistic about the Royal Family, if we did away with them I'd not want to see an elected HEad of State - just get the PM do it. The fewer elected the better imho. Blair would have been President.

I'm sure even if we did away with the Royal Family in the morning it is highly unlikley that they still wouldn't recieve many benefits from being Royal.


 
Thinking about getting rid of the monarchy whilst Game of Thrones is the front of our minds is perhaps risky in these times where threatening social media posts can land you in jail....
 
Given she got a 2.1 it doesn't seem she was that awful.

I'm sure even if we did away with the Royal Family in the morning it is highly unlikley that they still wouldn't recieve many benefits from being Royal.

You mean like Rexit
 
I'm pretty agnonistic about the Royal Family, if we did away with them I'd not want to see an elected HEad of State - just get the PM do it. The fewer elected the better imho. Blair would have been President.
That doesn't really make sense, though. If you 'just get the PM to do it', you are making the PM president. one of the problems with our system is that PMs are already too powerful due to the illegitimate nature of the head of state. I wouldn't want to give them even more power.

There is another option, one that is followed in lots of countries, such as Ireland, Germany and Italy - an elected head of state whose only job is to look after constitutional matters. More David Attenborough than Tony Blair.
 
That doesn't really make sense, though. If you 'just get the PM to do it', you are making the PM president. one of the problems with our system is that PMs are already too powerful due to the illegitimate nature of the head of state. I wouldn't want to give them even more power.
yeh, it's been much commented on recently, that theresa may's too powerful :rolleyes:
 
Pretty sure the Queen would win a presidential election if she stood.

There is another option, one that is followed in lots of countries, such as Ireland, Germany and Italy - an elected head of state whose only job is to look after constitutional matters. More David Attenborough than Tony Blair.

Ah yes, a well loved celebrity. Like Attenborough. Or Rolf Harris, everyone loves Rolf. Oh wait...
 
Pretty sure the Queen would win a presidential election if she stood.



Ah yes, a well loved celebrity. Like Attenborough. Or Rolf Harris, everyone loves Rolf. Oh wait...
Or someone very very dull and worthy, like a distinguished human rights lawyer. Germany goes for those types normally.

I agree that the queen would win a presidential election. Nothing's changing while she's alive, mind.
 
The tourism thing is clearly bollocks. The castles and palaces and that would all still be there if we orfed their heads, only people would be able to actually access them.

Imagine if Alton Towers locked the gates and put up a big sign saying "no visitors please, we're trying to attract visitors".
 
Last edited:
The tourism thing is clearly bollocks. The castles and palaces and that would all still be there if we orfed their heads, only people would be able to actually have access them.

Imagine if Alton Towers locked the gates and put up a big sign saying "no visitors please, we're trying to attract visitors".
:D

Paris. Shitty republican place. Nobody bothers going there.
 
Given she got a 2.1 it doesn't seem she was that awful.




I'm sure even if we did away with the Royal Family in the morning it is highly unlikley that they still wouldn't recieve many benefits from being Royal.



lose literally loads of Royals forever using this simple old trick
 
I'm pretty agnonistic about the Royal Family, if we did away with them I'd not want to see an elected HEad of State - just get the PM do it. The fewer elected the better imho. Blair would have been President.

To settle the score we should just let some random Ghanian or Burmese or Jamaican person unilaterally declare themselves our new monarch, have them and their increasingly cross-eyed and pointy-headed descendants rule for a few centuries then hand over to someone from some other country we've inflicted our bullshit monarchy on. Should barely be ten thousand years before we've paid or dues and no longer need to be ruled by some foreign person who has never even been here.
 
Back
Top Bottom