Johnny Canuck3
Well-Known Member
So show me the heavyweight intellectual (as opposed to artistic) tradition of Irish people? and I don't mean Protestant free-thinkers, I mean catholic ones. .
Irish Protestants aren't Irish now?
So show me the heavyweight intellectual (as opposed to artistic) tradition of Irish people? and I don't mean Protestant free-thinkers, I mean catholic ones. .
what exactly is your problem with those two words together?
have you even read the fuckin article?
Irish Protestants aren't Irish now?
What exactly are you trying to achieve here?
Irish Protestants aren't Irish now?
lol, a LOT of Protestant Irish Nationalists just erased from history there
a discussion. read the fuckin article.
Yesterday you posted about why Jews weren't capitalists, now you're posting about Jews and IQ. What's tomorrow? Why do Jews like bagels so much?
Who is Kelvin? Stop the next 20 Irish people you meet and ask them.
I take it he was/is an Irish scientist from a protestant, free-thinking background? Horray for you.
Now tell me about how every Irish child is taught about him at their grannies knee and how proud we all are of him.
The point about religion is simple enough even for you. 19th Century free-thinking, protestantism was culturally conducive to intellectual vigour, to investigation and analysis. Irish catholicism, based as it was/is on dumb acceptance and non-questioning compliance is not.
Anyways I asked you to make the case for Irish people. You have failed miserably.
never heard of any of them (was Boole the maths fella?).. Fill me in on some background.
And while you are at it tell me about how venerated/celebrated they are in Irish popular culture.
How about you discuss it? I'll take two points.a discussion. read the fuckin article.
Look at any anti-Semitic propaganda poster, and the reason is there. It's our hunchbacks (caused by too much cuddling of sacks of money).
First you said - there are none.
Now, with the goalposts twenty yards back, it's - show me ones who are venerated.
How about you discuss it? I'll take two points.
1. There are disproportionately more Jewish nobel prize winners. There are also disproportionately more white people winning nobel prizes. And disproportionately more men than women. Where is it sensible to look for the explanation? Is it in Jewish or white culture? Should we be looking for inherent intellectual differences between men and women? Or is the answer rather more prosaic?
2. IQ - is it a measure of innate intelligence? The answer is a resounding no. The article doesn't address this, and most of it is entirely irrelevant once this question has been answered.
so why do I have to defend the article, or the author? I posted it for discussion.
we've done that one, half-wit. Try and keep up.
everyone likes bagels, they are like the savoury cousin to the donut
oh come on wasn't going to respond to this but if you'd posted a thing about black people's iq do you reckon it would be all right?
i'm so fucking fed up of it, this shit seems to be everywhere on urban at the moment. and i've experienced it in real life as well recently.
load of fucking shit, sort yourself out.
oh come on wasn't going to respond to this but if you'd posted a thing about black people's iq do you reckon it would be all right?
i'm so fucking fed up of it, this shit seems to be everywhere on urban at the moment. and i've experienced it in real life as well recently.
load of fucking shit, sort yourself out.
WTF? If you posted up for discussion something written by a black geezer who was not only noting the historical and current intellectual prowess (nay superiority) of black people, but also putting forward a whole host of 'reasons' for it - some worthy of discussion, some decidedly dodgy - OF COURSE it would be alright.
Butchers caught you out on page 1, tbh. I hadn't realised that Charles Murray was one of the authors of that piece of excrement that is the 'Bell Curve'. This article just applies all the same falsehoods to another group. It's wrong. And it's racist. The author of that article is racist.
Who cares if he's Jewish?and Jewish I think. And a Zionist if you take his stuff about Israel and the 'clenliness' stuff into account.
Liam, I'm going to patronise you a bit here, but you really need to go and read up on the Bell Curve, and the way it was comprehensively debunked. That will provide you with all the answers you need about this article.
Do a search on here. It's been discussed before. Alternatively give it a google.so enlighten me. Seems to be fairly common currency AFAICS
and I dunno who the fuck Charles Murray is.
Maybe this thread can be rescued with some interesting content.
Here is an interesting website I came across the other day, it's the website of the linguistic authority of Ladino in Israel. Ladino is basically Judeo-Spanish, the language spoken by the Jews who lived in Spain and were subsequently expelled but continued to speak the language throughout the Mediterranean.
http://www.aki-yerushalayim.co.il/anl/ it's so weird because if you speak a Romance language you can get the jist of most of it! Really cool.
Irish Protestants aren't Irish now?
Irish Protestants aren't Irish now?
So show me the heavyweight intellectual (as opposed to artistic) tradition of Irish people? and I don't mean Protestant free-thinkers, I mean catholic ones. You can't, cos there isn't one.
Of course Ireland was once an intellectual beacon for Europe. But that was a long time ago.
There are, of course, many historical and social reasons for this. One of which is undoubtedly the influence of the Catholic Church in promoting a culture of acquiesence over centuries.
Do a search on here. It's been discussed before. Alternatively give it a google.
I'm not quite sure what you mean by 'common currency'.