I have been a menber of bcs (MBCS) since 1981 and recently was given the Chartered status. My wife has the same grade and at one time was a C.Eng.
I would say the qualification is worth less than a bucket of cold spit ( typo stopped me writing the an alternative to spit, but it will do).
http://www.itcontractor.com/Articles_IR35_News_Advice/view_article.asp?id_no=1894&photopage=0In terms of recruitment or suitability for taking on contract positions, being a Chartered Engineer counts for nothing - hence, the Chartered status has no perceived value in the workplace.
From my experience in getting contracts in the UK, I have never been asked for a professional certification like this. I would suggest it's not worth it.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/...cs-chartered-it-professional-citp-worth-it-ukThe BCS say CITP means something, but having just gone through the US visa process I had asked them for proof of status for the visa. At this point their tune changed and the response I had from them was "It's just a grade of membership" - which is rather different to the selling point of "a rigorously assessed, employer led qualification". Certainly it has no effect on the US visa process, indicating it's not counted as a qualification at all, at least to the US government.
We find him really, really funny.Why is everyone getting so worked up about this guy?
Chartered IT professional whose web page doesn't render properly in Firefox. Sign me up now.
Wow, that would be ..... totally pointless.
He's not just a 'Chartered IT Professional '
He's also a self trumpeted "leading public figure in the socio-legal, info-scientific and economic solutions to issues affecting techno-cultural communities, both organic and virtual. A pioneer in educational technology and online community development."
And he's an incredibly modest and not even slightly self deluded "leading public figure in the socio-legal, info-scientific and economic solutions to issues affecting techno-cultural communities, both organic and virtual. A pioneer in educational technology and online community development" too.
After reading the thread you should have just called him a cunt. Would have saved you a lot of typing as what you say above = he is a cunt.
so you cannot provide me with a citation of it actually being used. until you can, it is speculation
You can cite my blog if you wish for now:
http://jonathanbishop.com/index.php/403/sysop-prerogative/
"No, *I'm* a leading public figure!"
"No, *I'm* a leading public figure!"
Anyway, back to the OP and, to be fair, it would be a small list of things that wouldn't be fractionMan's fault. I hear that he was responsible for the Large Hadron Collider not working properly first time round, for example.
He is also at fault for the Chilean earthquake.
That deserves a double-entry in Private Eye - "socio-legal, info-scientific and economic solutions" *and* techno-cultural communities. This is what Private Eye wet dreams are made of!He's not just a 'Chartered IT Professional '
He's also a self trumpeted "leading public figure in the socio-legal, info-scientific and economic solutions to issues affecting techno-cultural communities, both organic and virtual. A pioneer in educational technology and online community development."
And he's an incredibly modest and not even slightly self deluded "leading public figure in the socio-legal, info-scientific and economic solutions to issues affecting techno-cultural communities, both organic and virtual. A pioneer in educational technology and online community development" too.
He made Wayne Rooney be a fat, useless waster.
Wow, you really ARE a leading public figure, fogbat! There is proof and everything!
That's ok. I've made you a leading public figure, too.