Is Elon Musk the greatest visionary or the greatest snake oil salesman of our age?
- Thread starter tim
- Start date
BigMoaner
What A Load of Old Bollocks
Dont forget paying them as well.
hitmouse
music obfuscation technology
It's great, back in the bad old days you could get your content suppressed if the FBI didn't like you, but now you can get your content suppressed if the FBI doesn't like you, or if Andy Ngo doesn't like you, or if Modi and the BJP don't like you. It's great progress.
Still, I'm sure xtwitterx is completely free from FBI interference now. Let's check their most recent transparency report and we can learn all about it:
Puddy_Tat
naturally fluffy
8ball
Decolonise colons!
i thought they refused to wear masks...
Let’s not bring that up again.
Puddy_Tat
naturally fluffy
BigMoaner
What A Load of Old Bollocks
It Looks Like Twitter Is in Even Deeper Trouble Than We Thought
Marketing firm Ebuiquity found that the vast majority of biggest spenders have stopped advertising on X following Elon Musk's takeover.
futurism.com
PR1Berske
Alligator in chains by the park gates.
Musk was described the other day on a tweet I can no not find as one of those blokes who hates seeing their friends become successful and malfunctions as a result. The concept of Wikimedia being financially sound baffles him because he can't comprehend using wealth for good, he only knows accumulated wealth as a status symbol. He can't accept that debate relies on compromise, he only wants absolutes.
The crypto/NFT/techbro contingent are hoodwinked, and perhaps the spell will break. He's tanked Twitter because he's rich enough to not give a shit, of course. And as long as enough similar "stocks and Tesla" fanboys fund him he'll have the Twitter Titanic all to himself.
The crypto/NFT/techbro contingent are hoodwinked, and perhaps the spell will break. He's tanked Twitter because he's rich enough to not give a shit, of course. And as long as enough similar "stocks and Tesla" fanboys fund him he'll have the Twitter Titanic all to himself.
PR1Berske
Alligator in chains by the park gates.
Absolute bollocks.
krtek a houby
Merry Xmas!
Something about satellite feeds into Ukraine being cut...
BigMoaner
What A Load of Old Bollocks
Guys you do realise I was joking
teuchter
je suis teuchter
Joking was banned in post 7738.
krtek a houby
Merry Xmas!
Lies
NoXion
Craicy the Squirrel
From a habitual troll? No way!
Nylock
I hate 'these days'...
It's not just at university-level where tutors refuse to accept wiki as a viable source...
That's a lot of words for "Fuck off, Dwyer"
Lord Camomile
Yipchaa!
Also on Mastermind.
krtek a houby
Merry Xmas!
Unfortunately, there's little we can do about the Musk problem.It's not just at university-level where tutors refuse to accept wiki as a viable source...
That's a lot of words for "Fuck off, Dwyer"
Dwyer on the other hand...
Yuwipi Woman
Whack-A-Mole Queen
On the long-term the Musk problem will probably take care of itself, unless he can beg more money off of various governments. Much of his wealth is derived from such corporate welfare.
Last edited:
Not at all, there's plenty of evidence that the FBI controlled Twitter before Musk:
BigMoaner
What A Load of Old Bollocks
Is that why the former owner Dorsey is asking that ALL the twitter files are released (not just the ones Musk wants to fit his narrative of shitting on the former owners?)Not at all, there's plenty of evidence that the FBI controlled Twitter before Musk:
I don't know, has Dorsey given any indication of what his aim might be?
NoXion
Craicy the Squirrel
The "Twitter Files" are composed of stuff that was selectively released and framed to push a particular narrative. Whatever Dorsey's motivations, he's at least honest enough to acknowledge that. Are you?
Spymaster
Plastic Paddy
Shame we can't do something similar with you. Can't you bugger off again?
If you've just come back to snipe at people as per usual, why did you bother?
hitmouse
music obfuscation technology
I've never met the man and can't speak for him, but I would guess that one possible explanation might be, if the data shows that the level of state involvement has stayed roughly the same under new management or indeed increased, Dorsey might want people to see that? In the mean time, I suppose we could try analysing the trends shown in twitter's transparency reporting, but that might not be terribly illuminating.
Similar threads
