Yes, anyone who uses X is boosting a platform that spreads racist propaganda.View attachment 442319
It makes me feel sad when I see embedded tweets or anything else that boosts his platform here.
Yes, anyone who uses X is boosting a platform that spreads racist propaganda.
how do you show tweets without embedding them? (asking for a friend)
You could probably say that of all social media platforms to some degree.
The owner of X/Twitter incited racist riots in this country. He made comments that were incitement, and he re-posted the most vile racist posts. By having an account with Twitter, people are actually enabling this racist. His income stream depends on people engaging. The advertisers would not advertise on X is there were no posts and no-one had an account.You probably could but, as someone who has never been a participant on any social media platform, I get the impression from what I read on Urban that Musk-owned Xitter is now qualitatively worse than social media platforms of, say, a decade ago.
It does seem slightly odd and more than slightly disappointing that so many Urban posters still regularly post links, and (without understanding what the technical limits might be) that Urban is still set up to allow Twitter links.
You've rightly decided not to allow any sort of advertising here editor, and I'm sure most of us are hugely grateful for that. Maybe it's time to seriously consider making Urban Twitter-free as well as ad-free.
Plus c&p the text for people who use screen readers.Screenshot
You could probably say that of all social media platforms to some degree.
I get the sense that it's more important to him that almost everything. To be seen as the edgy man of the (right wing) people.In support of BigMoaner ’s ongoing documenting of Musk’s terminally online subjectivity.
A day in Elon Musk’s mind: 145 tweets with election conspiracies and emojis
A controversial tweet may make it to the news, but reading every post from the world’s richest man shows how frenzied and extreme he really iswww.theguardian.com
145 tweets in the day the journalist happened to document, mostly during about 4pm to 2am and 8am to noon. Just a basement dweller constantly hitting the dopamine button.
It would be really cheap. I could not believe it but after another look online here are a few more tiny electric cars (not tesla) that start in the range of $7000 up.$7,000 would be an insanely low price, so I looked it up, and the proposed price - it's not due out till next year - is $20-25,000 for "basic trim." That sounds pretty good if basic trim does mean usable rather than it being Ryanair-style pricing or having a subscription on top. We'll have to wait and see. Not that I'm going to be biting a car anyway, but subscriptions would definitely put me off if I were.
The article I looked up though had this line, which confused me:
"According to a Tesla Engineering HQ video, teams of people and robots will work on fully assembling separate parts of the car and marrying them all together at the end in one go, meaning the whole car is only fully built once."
Er, is the implication that cars are often built more than once??
I imagine they will in due course, because they find his posts interesting, and will want to just ask questionsThis guy should be getting visits from the Secret Service
What exactly is it that he is trying to do with cars that you are impressed with?much as I dislike Musk...I am impressed at what he is trying to do with cars.
That c bomb is one of the best I’ve ever seen. The comma beautifully placed before it.
I'm betting a shiny, new pound coin that musk/Tesla never sell a new car for $7k.
He's just a bullshitter.
This guy should be getting visits from the Secret Service, not multibillion-dollar government contracts
View attachment 442884