Hayek is fascinating. He literally wrote the book (“The Sensory Order”) on embodied psychology — a revolutionary (and quite correct) challenge to Cartesian dualism, which locates cognition as being the result of modal sensory interpretation. This means there is no such thing as objective, context-free information, only the interpretation of the world for a purpose. And then, having given the world this jewel of radical psychology, he decided he hated the implications of it for the social order and so spent the rest of his life devoted to building an economics that denied the very thing he had worked so hard to establish — an economics entirely built on the reification of “information” as a disembodied and contextless commodity, whose exchange should replace all notions of “social justice” as the way to organise society. Hayek the psychologist should have hated Hayek the economist! But the latter was explicitly ideological in his view of “social justice” as being primitive and tribal thinking.