Ĝasper
Well-Known Member
Good wee bit of sci-fi... Understand the view point of a guy at work... Why not??Why?
Good wee bit of sci-fi... Understand the view point of a guy at work... Why not??Why?
Turns out this was massively optimistic. What's it been? Two days?I give it a month.
Numbers work differently in this realm - pure mathemuskticksTurns out this was massively optimistic. What's it been? Two days?
They've given up already. Blue ticks being restored all over.
Twitter restores ‘blue tick’ free of charge to celebrities in U-turn
Decision to reinstate ‘verified’ status without distinguishing paid-for from free users prompts criticism for ‘false advertising’www.theguardian.com
They've given up already. Blue ticks being restored all over.
Twitter restores ‘blue tick’ free of charge to celebrities in U-turn
Decision to reinstate ‘verified’ status without distinguishing paid-for from free users prompts criticism for ‘false advertising’www.theguardian.com
And a most successful implosion, at that
Some users such as Britain First will have a gold tick to indicate that “it’s an official organisation on Twitter”, though some media outlets have had this removed from its account.
BBC News, CNN, NBC News and Fox News are among the affected outlets that no longer have a gold checkmark.
What is Twitter Verified Organizations?
Twitter Verified Organizations is a new service we’re testing for corporate entities on Twitter. Subscribers to this service receive a gold checkmark which designates the account as belonging to an official business on Twitter.
What does the affiliation badge mean?
Through Twitter Verified Organizations, businesses can affiliate other accounts with their account. Affiliated accounts receive a label with the image from the business's profile picture.
We are currently piloting this with a number of select businesses on Twitter.
Someone pointed out the other day that the blue ticks were in fact primarily for the benefit of Twitter. Famous people really don't like being impersonated, having the reputations put at risk etc, so the blue ticks were to reassure famous people and keep them on the site, and to assure users that they were following who they thought they were following, thus making the site actually usable. The blue ticks were vital to Twitter's bottom line. I think Musk has just, belatedly, realised this. Says a lot that he doesn't have people around him who could have pointed it out earlier.They've given up already. Blue ticks being restored all over.
Twitter restores ‘blue tick’ free of charge to celebrities in U-turn
Decision to reinstate ‘verified’ status without distinguishing paid-for from free users prompts criticism for ‘false advertising’www.theguardian.com
Ah, such is the problem with linking to tweets. It's from the same account as above, a fake Disney account managed to get verified and went buckwild with it.
true, completely agree on official accounts/advertisers/brands/celebs - pissing off the people who make your platform valuable seemed like a monumentally stupid thing to do.I saw on mastodon that they've had another uptick in activity, I'm guessing as a result of this nonsense, so I think there is such a thing as bad publicity. It seems particularly unwise to piss of official govt accounts and so on. They're not going to enjoy being at the whim of a billionaire any more than us, and if they feel there's reputational hazard will start moving off the platform -particularly if they see an alternative.
I mean, he's had a lot of people telling him that for quite some time. Like, half of Twitter.Someone pointed out the other day that the blue ticks were in fact primarily for the benefit of Twitter. Famous people really don't like being impersonated, having the reputations put at risk etc, so the blue ticks were to reassure famous people and keep them on the site, and to assure users that they were following who they thought they were following, thus making the site actually usable. The blue ticks were vital to Twitter's bottom line. I think Musk has just, belatedly, realised this. Says a lot that he doesn't have people around him who could have pointed it out earlier.
Yeah but that might have been bots ...if only twitter had had a way of telling who was whomI mean, he's had a lot of people telling him that for quite some time. Like, half of Twitter.
Some maybe more politely than others...
Any name-and-random-number account which posts is a bot.Yeah but that might have been bots ...if only twitter had had a way of telling who was whom
Yay my twitter is bot! Glad I don't use it that much thoughAny name-and-random-number account which posts is a bot.
Any name-and-random-number account which stands still is a well-disciplined bot.
Fucking blue tick melts!