Well if the verified New York City twitter account said they were going to reduce police funding by 70 percent, then yeah you could assume that was real. Now you have to check the tag and the number of followers etc etc, which is difficult for an app specifically designed to be scrolled through quickly.
Surely unscheduled means it was unscheduled.
www.theverge.com
Twitter taught Microsoft’s AI chatbot to be a racist asshole in less than a day
The Verge is about technology and how it makes us feel. Founded in 2011, we offer our audience everything from breaking news to reviews to award-winning features and investigations, on our site, in video, and in podcasts.
www.bloomberg.com
No sniggering at the back please.
In the span of 24 hours, Tesla’s earnings disappointed, a SpaceX rocket exploded and Twitter purged legacy blue checkmarks.
Elon Musk’s Wealth Plunges $13 Billion as Drama Unfolds Across Empire
In the span of 24 hours, Tesla’s earnings disappointed, a SpaceX rocket exploded and Twitter purged legacy blue checkmarks.
Sure they hoped it might go further but realistically for what they're trying to achieve this was still useful and more successful than it could have been. Lots of things they were testing worked.
Top 50 self destruct successThe self destruct systems for example
I've just finished that short course on AI trustworthiness (by University of Helsinki - I was testing a new course for them). I am by no means an expert now after a few hours' study, but it's given me an overview. To be fair to them, they say exactly this - that mitigation is the best you can hope for. Some of the techniques used are adversarial and purposely add noise that makes the AI less effective.
Which he'd describe as a successful human/computer interface
Guess I just don't really trust anything on twitter.
(But obviously if this is something users want/use, getting rid off it/starting charging for something people have presumably been using for free for a long time doesn't seem the best idea.)
