Look at the hundreds of other people saying AI development needs to "slow down" - in fact, be regulated by the state...Musk is the least interesting one of these voices calling for itWhat I'm hearing is that he bought Twitter as a source of data to feed AI development. His talk about the evils of AI is just his way of trying to slow down the competition, who has a hefty lead on him. I don't have the reference point to know if that's true or not, but it makes some of his movements make more sense. On the other hand, his moves may really not make sense.
I assume it's to do with training AI, I would have thought that Microsoft would have checked what they were doing was in alignment with the ToS.
not sure what this means, expensive things hopefully
Look at the hundreds of other people saying AI development needs to "slow down" - in fact, be regulated by the state...Musk is the least interesting one of these voices calling for it
AI has plenty good data fed into it, it doesnt need crank central twitter to make it better
I assume it's to do with training AI, I would have thought that Microsoft would have checked what they were doing was in alignment with the ToS.
Was he a genus after all or just a massive twat. Who can say.What I'm hearing is that he bought Twitter as a source of data to feed AI development. His talk about the evils of AI is just his way of trying to slow down the competition, who has a hefty lead on him. I don't have the reference point to know if that's true or not, but it makes some of his movements make more sense. On the other hand, his moves may really not make sense.
I was reading something about AI and bias and having the facepalming thought 'Oh God, people are going to say that removing AI bias is "being woke"' aaaaand, sure enough, here is Musk saying it's 'politically correct' and dishonest to try to not make AI a fucking dustbin of the world's prejudices.Elon Musk reportedly planning to launch AI rival to ChatGPT maker
Tesla and Twitter boss said to be bringing together team, weeks after co-signing letter demanding pause in AI researchwww.theguardian.com
How long before that one's shut down for being a racist neo-nazi chatbot? Unless that's going to be its USP.
"Not exploding" really was the primary mission goal. Rapid iteration and testing is how SpaceX operates. Instead of taking 5 years to engineer everything to perfection and launching once, they build, test, build, test 10 times, all the time gaining real world experience and data. The first dozen or so landing attempts with Falcon 9 failed. Now they've done it over 160 times and have complete market dominance, despite Musk's massive bellendery.It's hard not to be slightly impressed by the sheer level of commitment to sticking to the bullshit tbh. 'Well you're all fixated on the fact that it exploded, but you're missing that for several seconds it didn't explode. In fact it spent far more time not exploding than it did exploding. Clearly a success.'
Nothing says "I'm great to work with" like responding to a rejection with threats.
In case anyone didnt see it already
That's a nice big thing to say. But how exactly are they going to achieve it? Doesn't say.I was reading something about AI and bias and having the facepalming thought 'Oh God, people are going to say that removing AI bias is "being woke"' aaaaand, sure enough, here is Musk saying it's 'politically correct' and dishonest to try to not make AI a fucking dustbin of the world's prejudices.
"I'm worried about the fact that [ChatGPT] is being trained to be politically correct, which is another way of saying untruthful things," he said. "Certainly the path to dystopia is to train AI to be deceptive."
Yes, instead it should just churn out the world's bigotry because that's how the world is and everyone who isn't a white, straight, able bodied cis man has to live with it.
Elon Musk says he wants to create his own "safer" version of ChatGPT called TruthGPT
Musk said his AI tool would know humans are an important part of the universe and be unlikely to try and annihilate them.www.cbsnews.com
his plan would be to make "a maximum truth-seeking AI that tries to understand the nature of the universe
That's a nice big thing to say. But how exactly are they going to achieve it? Doesn't say.
Whole point right now is that ChatGPT doesn't understand anything. It doesn't know anything, let alone what 'truth' is. It's still an open question as to whether or not this technology can ever achieve understanding.
Ironically enough, this is an example of Musk doing the thing ChatGPT is prone to – bullshitting. He says it for effect, to please/persuade the audience, with no regard for the truth, hoping that others won't check up on what he's saying and call him on it. And they haven't called him on it in this article.
Did you miss the end??to be honest, if he wasn't such a forever online twat trying to push right wing memes and arguing with teenage girls, i would be right behind this. always humbling to see tech like this in use.
I've got an even worse one for you. At some point its skills will be good enough to carry on a conversation through the day as though it's a "friend in the room who just knows stuff." It'll be marketed as a cure for loneliness in the elderly and isolated. And that cure will be paid for by the deployment of more virulent strains of manipulation, commercial and political, than we've ever seen before against those least able to defend themselves. Direct influence-peddling and monetisation of alienation and atomisation on behalf of the very State and Capital that created these modern woes.Oh my god, I’ve just realised that it’s the program Reason by WayForward Technologies from Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency. The one where you give it the conclusion you want and it provides a logical sounding justification for it, no matter how dumb.
They're already touting it for this. It will seem real right up to the point when it doesn't, when it says something crass that shows it doesn't actually understand or empathise or care, and everything it might have said up to that point is exposed for what it is. There's a horrible picture outside the Wellcome institute of an elderly woman holding a robot in her arms. It's an awful idea even without the capitalism angle. It's elderly abuse.I've got an even worse one for you. At some point its skills will be good enough to carry on a conversation through the day as though it's a "friend in the room who just knows stuff." It'll be marketed as a cure for loneliness in the elderly and isolated. And that cure will be paid for by the deployment of more virulent strains of manipulation, commercial and political, than we've ever seen before against those least able to defend themselves. Direct influence-peddling and monetisation of alienation and atomisation on behalf of the very State and Capital that created these modern woes.