It's worse than that even, as unfettered AI not only reflects bias, it amplifies it.Musk's 'untruthful things' statement is telling, it's that school of thought that says we shouldn't have greater representation of people of colour or women because 'that's not realistic', and that this is just the way the world is and it's fine for me (always said by someone white and usually a man or else a woman who seeks stability and 'protection' by siding with the men) and everyone else is just a fragile whinger.
Tbf chatgtp is very polite and has clearly been trained so. It has an enlightenment, Wikipedia style . The weighting of responses is controlled and can readily be programmed to be weight differently. The question of political bias is a real one with AI, it's one of the danger areas 'pausers' are worried aboutThat's a nice big thing to say. But how exactly are they going to achieve it? Doesn't say.
Whole point right now is that ChatGPT doesn't understand anything. It doesn't know anything, let alone what 'truth' is. It's still an open question as to whether or not this technology can ever achieve understanding.
Ironically enough, this is an example of Musk doing the thing ChatGPT is prone to – bullshitting. He says it for effect, to please/persuade the audience, with no regard for the truth, hoping that others won't check up on what he's saying and call him on it. And they haven't called him on it in this article.
In the last few days, I've been learning about how to check for AI bias. Because it's black box, you have to use various indirect methods (which are pretty clever tbf) to work out how it arrived at its decisions. The checking itself is laborious and expensive. Those companies that have jumped in to AI are finding that it's not the bargain they thought it was.The one I remember was someone had some resume-screening program for hiring at a big business in the US and they thought they'd got rid of obvious biases, but it picked up on 'playing lacrosse' as something desirable candidates shared. Which was something that was a clear indicator of privately-educated white men.
Programming to Avoid Bias is the job of some people out thereIt's worse than that even, as unfettered AI not only reflects bias, it amplifies it.
Yeah, but did you see that video of what it looks like when it isn't constrained? It feeds back on its loopiness and very quickly turns aggressive and abusive.Tbf chatgtp is very polite and has clearly been trained so. It has an enlightenment, Wikipedia style . The weighting of responses is controlled and can readily be programmed to be weight differently. The question of political bias is a real one with AI, it's one of the danger areas 'pausers' are worried about
Yeah, I've been doing a short course on it - not with a view to doing it, just to learn how it works. Checking AI for bias is extremely involved and expensive.Programming to Avoid Bias is the job of some people out there
And those people also exist in a context at a particular time in history. Bias can’t be “avoided”. It needs to be understood and mitigated.Programming to Avoid Bias is the job of some people out there
Yes obviously. chatgtp has it's own political flavour which has been chosen. It seems perfectly possible that another AI can have it's own flavour, whether that's driven by Musk or some other stateAnd those people also exist in a context at a particular time in history. Bias can’t be “avoided”. It needs to be understood and mitigated.
It’s not just possible, it’s inevitable.Yes obviously. chatgtp has it's own political flavour which has been chosen. It seems perfectly possible that another AI can have it's own flavour, whether that's driven by Musk or some other state
Is it the cute one that looks like a baby seal?There's a horrible picture outside the Wellcome institute of an elderly woman holding a robot in her arms. It's an awful idea even without the capitalism angle. It's elderly abuse.
It continues to be not simply 'a bad idea', but just an absolute fucking joke of a situation
Did people think it was? I mean I don't use twitter but I've never thought of it as reliable tbh.They've just totally destroyed it as any reliable source of information. I mean. Fair play.
You used to be able to reliably know that a post was made by a given person or organisation and now you don't.Did people think it was? I mean I don't use twitter but I've never thought of it as reliable tbh.