Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

*IRAQ: latest news and developments

Consider the Parallels with Vietnam
An Iraq War & Occupation Glossary
Allies -- As in the Indochina War, the U.S. in Iraq is twisting arms to compel a few weak client states (in the Vietnam era it was Korea and Australia, now it's Poland, Bulgaria and maybe India, a particularly weird choice given that nation's fundamentalist Hindu government and its militant crackdown against Muslims), to send a token few troops to make the occupation and counterinsurgency look like an international effort. This is, in other words, not your grandfather's allies of World War II.
http://www.counterpunch.org/lindorff07112003.html
 
LONDON (Reuters) - Companies that jumped at lucrative contracts to repair Iraq's infrastructure are having second thoughts because of increased costs and security fears.
Privately owned U.S. company Abt Associates, which is trying to get Iraq's health ministry up and running, said at a recent briefing with the U.S. government that staff members were asking for armoured vehicles for protection.
"This is a real budget breaker," said Abt project manager Jeffrey Gould.
----
For example, a typical policy worth 150,000 pounds ($245,600) would require weekly payments of 4,500 pounds a week per security worker.



http://www.reuters.com/locales/newsArticle.jsp?type=businessNews&locale=en_IN&storyID=3076153
 
DUBAI - Former Iraqi information minister Mohammed Saeed Al Sahaf, who earned the nickname 'Comical Ali' during the US-led war on Iraq, made a sudden appearance in Abu Dhabi yesterday, saying he might not return to his homeland. "When I leave I always have in my mind that I might not come down this road again, but I hope and pray to God that I can return to Baghdad one day," he said on Abu Dhabi Television.
http://www.khaleejtimes.com/Display...3/July/theuae_July281.xml&section=theuae&col=


I think Blair will soon assume his nickname.
 
No date yet for establishment of Iraqi governing council, Bremer news conference canceled



Several international media outlets had reported the council would be named this weekend, and U.S. officials said Iraq's American administrator, L. Paul Bremer, would hold a news conference Saturday where he was expected to announce the makeup of the council. The meeting with reporters, however, was canceled early Saturday. No reason was given.

http://cbsnewyork.com/international/Iraq-GoverningCouncil-ai/resources_news_html
 
Bush Overstated Iraq Links To al-Qaida, Former Intelligence Officials Say
Washington (AP) - As President Bush works to quiet a controversy over his discredited claim of Iraqi uranium shopping in Africa, another of his prewar assertions is coming under fire: the alleged link between Saddam Hussein's regime and al-Qaida.

http://www.katv.com/news/stories/0703/94469.html


Oh what a tangled web we weave and all that.
 
Mounting casualties, Iraqi resistance take toll on US troops
The Pentagon announced Wednesday that the casualty toll among American soldiers in Iraq has risen to 1,256 since the war began March 20. This includes 212 dead and 1,044 injured. Since Bush declared major combat over on May 1, 382 soldiers have been wounded or injured and 74 killed--an average of one death and six injuries each day. At the present rate, by the end of August more US soldiers will have died in Iraq since the end of the war than were killed during the six-week invasion and occupation of the country.

So frequent have the attacks become that the US occupation authority announced this week it would pay a $2,500 reward for information leading to the arrest of anyone shooting at or killing a foreign soldier or an Iraqi policeman. Former New York City police commissioner Bernard Kerik, who now heads the Baghdad police force, announced the reward after seven Iraqi police cadets were killed by a bomb during their graduation ceremony.

Two more US soldiers were killed Wednesday night, and a third wounded, as the result of a series of guerrilla attacks involving rocket-propelled grenades and small arms. One death came near Mahmudiyah, 15 miles south of Baghdad, while the other was near Tikrit, 120 miles north of the capital. Three separate mortar attacks hit US troops in the city of Ramdi, 60 miles west of Baghdad. These attacks indicate a higher level of organized opposition, since at least ten fighters are required to move, assemble, aim and disassemble the mortar.

Another US soldier died Wednesday in what military officials called a "non-hostile gunshot incident," a Pentagon euphemism for suicide. It was the second suicide in three days, following the death of a soldier in the 101st Airborne division who killed himself at the US air base near Balad, about 50 miles north of Baghdad. The suicides are a clear sign of the growing stress on American troops.
source: http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/jul2003/iraq-j11.shtml
 
Thursday 26 June 2003

Ray McGovern, CIA analyst for 27 years, serving seven Presidents, claims that Congress was tricked into supporting the war through the forgery of documents that "showed" that Iraq was getting weapons of mass destruction from Niger.


"The most important and clear-cut scandal, of course, has to do with the forgery of those Niger nuclear documents that were used as proof. The very cold calculation was that Congress could be deceived, we could have our war, we could win it, and then no one would care that part of the evidence for war was forged. That may still prove to be the case, but..."

He says that it is a real possibility that the US will plant weapons of mass destruction in Iraq

http://new.globalfreepress.com/article.pl?sid=03/06/27/018222&mode=thread
 
US convenes Iraqi council with aim of grabbing oil
A new "governing council" appointed by Washington's administrator in Baghdad, L. Paul Bremer, has been hailed by the Bush administration as a step toward democracy. However, numerous reports from both the US and Iraq indicate that the real function of this body will be to rubber stamp the privatization of the Middle Eastern country's oil industry and the US expropriation of its earnings for years to come.

The so-called interim government, to consist of approximately 25 individuals hand-picked by Bremer, is to assemble this weekend for a formal swearing-in ceremony. It is to include right-wing, pro-US exiles, led by the convicted bank embezzler Ahmad Chalabi, Washington-backed Kurdish groups, and at least one Shiite Islamic group. The Supreme Council of the Islamic Revolution in Iraq told Bremer that it would not decide until Saturday whether it would participate. Its hesitancy reflects the growing hostility toward the US-British occupation among Iraq's oppressed Shiite majority.

While the council was proposed by Bremer's predecessor, retired General Jay Garner, as a means of lending the occupation an "Iraqi face," Bremer backed off from initial pledges to convene a congress to select members of the body, and insisted that it would be no more than an advisory group. Over the past week, the US proconsul has tried to accommodate the groups and individuals agreeing to participate by affirming that they will "share responsibility" for governing the country, while "final authority" on every decision will rest with the US colonial authorities.

Among the principal concerns of US officials has been to parcel out the seats on the council to members of different ethnic groups and to include some relatively unknown women, apparently with the aim of lending the panel a superficial appearance of being representative. Excluded from the council, however, is anyone voicing opposition to the continued US occupation.

Given the recent deadly attacks by Iraqi resistance fighters on police recruits and others collaborating with the US occupation, however, it is doubtful that the council will have much contact with the Iraqi people. Instead, it will be on the receiving end of a series of US proposals worked out behind the scenes before the US invasion even began.

At a Tuesday press briefing in Baghdad, Bremer spelled out his determination to push through a wholesale privatization of Iraq's oil industry and the rest of its large state-owned sector before Iraqis are given any opportunity to vote for a government or express their attitude toward such sweeping economic changes. He and other US officials have acknowledged that there is widespread popular sentiment against the denationalization of oil and its takeover by foreign-owned multinationals.
source: http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/jul2003/iraq-j12.shtml
 
20 Lies About the War
Falsehoods ranging from exaggeration to plain untruth were used to make the case for war. More lies are being used in the aftermath. By Glen Rangwala and Raymond Whitaker


5 Iraq still had vast stocks of chemical and biological weapons from the first Gulf War
Iraq possessed enough dangerous substances to kill the whole world, it was alleged more than once. It had pilotless aircraft which could be smuggled into the US and used to spray chemical and biological toxins. Experts pointed out that apart from mustard gas, Iraq never had the technology to produce materials with a shelf-life of 12 years, the time between the two wars. All such agents would have deteriorated to the point of uselessness years ago.
6 Iraq retained up to 20 missiles which could carry chemical or biological warheads, with a range which would threaten British forces in Cyprus
Apart from the fact that there has been no sign of these missiles since the invasion, Britain downplayed the risk of there being any such weapons in Iraq once the fighting began. It was also revealed that chemical protection equipment was removed from British bases in Cyprus last year, indicating that the Government did not take its own claims seriously.

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=424008
 
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - A U.S.-backed Iraqi Governing Council held its inaugural meeting Sunday, stressing the start of a new era by abolishing national holidays that honored Saddam Hussein and creating a new one to mark his downfall.
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=worldNews&storyID=3080223

What an odd idea - not exactly condusive to healing rifts between the groups - or maybe it will be a day of rememberance for all those killed during "shock and awe".
 
Bit more along the lines of latest post by Bigfish re Iraq oil

Washington -- The Bush administration is considering a provocative proposal to pledge a portion of Iraq's future oil and gas revenue to secure long-term reconstruction loans before a new Iraqi government is in place to sign off on the idea.
----
"Unless a reconstituted Iraqi government or the U.N. Security Council authorizes the plan, it appears to violate international law," said Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Los Angeles. "We do not have the right, without additional authority,
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/07/11/MN296538.DTL
 
Shabby cause to shed blood:
The bad news is that the Japanese government wants to send troops to Iraq. The good news is that this time Tokyo has probably gone too far.

full: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4092.htm

===

India not to send troops to Iraq:
The internal debate within the Government is over and "on balance of considerations", the decision is that it will not be in India's national interest to send its troops to Iraq.

Full:http://www.hinduonnet.com/stories/2003071305290100.htm
 
'I don't know what I'm doing here in this city'


Sitting ducks for snipers' bullets, far from home and unable to contact their families, US troops in Iraq are finding their morale slipping away. Lee Gordon talks to servicemen and women for whom victory in the Gulf now has a hollow ring

13 July 2003

'We didn't win this war, not at all," said reserve infantryman Eric Holt, on guard outside the Republican Palace in Baghdad. "I don't know what I'm doing here and I don't like what's happening in this city," continued the 28-year-old from New York State. "It ain't right for the folks here. You know, there are a whole lot of our girls getting pregnant just so they can go home quick."

Morale among troops in the Iraqi capital has plunged, not least because of new orders that could see them there for a year instead of six months. Four soldiers have been shot by snipers or at close range near Baghdad University in the last seven days, in apparently random killings similar to that of the British journalist Richard Wild last weekend. The 24-year-old former British army officer was killed by a single shot to the back of his head after leaving the university, where he had been meeting Islamic groups.

The investigation into Mr Wild's death has been hampered by the decision of the military police to withdraw from the campus, where religious edicts have appeared on the walls ordering females to cover their heads. Only one company of about 100 former New York and LA army policemen is responsible for investigating crimes, and the order to stay away from the university means it has not been able to interview witnesses or find forensic evidence such as the spent bullet. Meanwhile Mr Wild's body is understood to be at the airport waiting transfer to Britain. The British embassy has declined to say more.

Violence is commonplace in Baghdad. On Monday a soldier was killed and three others injured when a home-made bomb was tossed on to a military convoy as it emerged from an underpass. The explosion ripped into a Humvee military car, tossing it across the road.

A crowd gathered to watch as the three injured soldiers were loaded into another Humvee. Sergeant Patrick Compton, who bore the brunt of the explosion, lay across the front seat of the damaged vehicle holding his torn and badly burnt arm, screaming for help. He was helped into the rescue vehicle but later died of his injuries. Asked about the incident, a sergeant in the military police smiled and lifted his helmet to wipe the sweat that was running down his face. "We're going to help clean up this mess and move out of here. Quickly. There is no damn chance of us catching anyone." Pointing to his men, who were trying to hold back a crowd of around 100 pushing towards the debris, he said: "There is nothing more we can do."

Outside Baghdad the situation is also difficult. Border guards, far away from internet caf?s and international telephones, find contacting their families particularly problematic. Forbidden from using military satellite communications, they often stop passing Iraqi traders and ask to use their telephones. A 22-year-old guard, part of a tank unit at the border, said he had not spoken to his wife for three months. It takes at least two months to receive a reply to a letter.

Perhaps not surprisingly, anecdotal evidence points to a growing number of breaches of military discipline. A spokesman said any soldier who fell pregnant would almost certainly be dishonourably discharged from the army and might even face a court martial, unless she was pregnant by her husband.

Prostitutes have now appeared. Rana, a 21-year-old Iraqi woman from Saddam's home town of Tikrit, said she had been working as a prostitute for a month near the army barracks in Abu Nawaz Street, central Baghdad. Most of her clients are US soldiers. She charges $50 for a night, including a room in a hotel in nearby Saddoon Street.

A receptionist at the hotel, where rooms are $30 for a twin, said there was no prostitution before the invasion. "We don't want our women to do these things," he said, adding that soldiers also try to sell handguns to make money. "They come in here and ask if I want to buy small guns a few times a week but we don't need any, we have a Kalashnikov."

The 11pm curfew means prostitutes and the brothels conduct their business early in the day. "Commanders turn a blind eye to soldiers who consort with prostitutes," a tank soldier said. "They understand the pressure on their troops."

"We're working 14 hours a day guarding and on patrol," a 21-year-old female reservist from Oklahoma said. "I finish and go straight to sleep then wake up an hour before duty, shower and start again. I don't think I can take an extra six months. I was looking forward to going home in October. But we're lucky in our squad because we drew down some cops from New York. The sergeant is from the Bronx. They're real tough and they're holding us together."

She spoke on the condition that she remain anonymous after her commander ordered troops not to give media interviews. Her colleague, a 26-year-old reservist from Houston who was studying to become a police officer, said she planned to quit the army as soon as she got home. "I've been in the army eight years and I can't do it any more, not after this. We're sitting here like targets and the Iraqis are getting bolder. They're taking a pop in broad daylight." One of the military policemen from her squad had cracked up and been sent home this week after a skirmish with Iraqi attackers, she said. "When I heard we might get another six months I wanted to cry."

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=424006
 
Anti-U.S. group in Iraq claims Al Qaeda link

The tape bore none of the hallmarks of bin Laden and al Qaeda messages previously aired on Arab channels. It was not peppered with Koranic sayings and it mentioned the Western calendar before the Islamic calendar.
The voice on the tape, which sounded slowed down for disguise, warned of an attack in the days to come that would "break the back of America completely".
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L14309622.htm
 
George Galloway
Monday July 14, 2003
The Guardian

"Now does he feel/ his secret murders sticking on his hands;/ now minutely revolts upbraid his faith-breach;/ those he commands move only in command,/ nothing in love: now does he feel his title/ hang loose about him, like a giant's robe/ upon a dwarfish thief."

Thus Angus spoke of the Scottish usurper Macbeth, whose ambition led him deep into a river of blood. Less poetically, Clare Short, Mo Mowlem and Robin Cook are saying much the same of their former cabinet colleague. I predicted before the war that Iraq would be the political death of Tony Blair, and it is now almost Shakespearean how the pain from his self-inflicted wounds is written across his face. It is as if he is physically diminishing before our eyes as his authority bleeds into the sands of Iraq.

Each new day brings another stab at Blair's credibility: former cabinet members in public, current ministers in private, using the round of summer parties to distance themselves from the fading king. From Hans Blix, the BBC and the press, from two former heads of the joint intelligence committee and now, perhaps fatally, from across the Atlantic, fall blow after hammer blow. Suddenly, comparing the two main war leaders to wolves - which has got me into such difficulty with the Labour hierarchy - seems very tame indeed.

Always travelling light on ideological baggage, never having won or wanted the affection of the Labour clan, Blair's main asset was his "Trust me, I'm a regular guy" reputation. Now it is gone and will never be recovered."

<snip>

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,997621,00.html
 
Just heard on BBC 1xtra news that they are getting reports one US soldier has been killed and several others injured in Bagdhad when someone threw a grenade into their truck.

couldn't find a link yet
 
Just listened to the news again and they didn't mention it.

I am trying to do a few things at once and may have misheard the report :confused: :oops:

apologies for any confusion
 
you were right first time...one dead either four or six injured...BBC Online, Oil & Gas Journal, Bloomberg...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3065243.stm

`Elsewhere in Baghdad one US soldier was killed and six injured in an ambush on their convoy in the city. `

I would expect the media to stop mentioning the deaths, or just to mention them in passing from now on, where possible of course...
 
It looks like the 'media' are becoming more emboldened

STEPHANOPOULOS:_ Okay, let's turn now to the controversy over the State of the Union, and this bad intelligence, which made it into the State of the Union._ George Tenet, the CIA director, has taken responsibility, but what more do you know about how this intelligence made it into the State of the Union, even though there had been doubts about it in the administration for many months?

RUMSFELD:_ I don't know much more than has been said._ George Tenet's statement says it all -- that there were 12 or 16 words that were in there._ They were technically correct -- that the -- reporting that the British had said that._ The British today still believe they are accurate.

STEPHANOPOULOS:_ But the CIA had great doubts about the British intelligence.

RUMSFELD:_ Some people did in the CIA and some people in the INR did at the Department of State and obviously if there's that kind of a debate, you wouldn't want it in there, and it didn't rise to the standard of a presidential speech, but it's not known, for example, that it was inaccurate._ In fact, people think it was technically accurate.

STEPHANOPOULOS:_ Have you seen the British intelligence?

RUMSFELD:_ No, not that I recall.

STEPHANOPOULOS:_ Do you believe that George Tenet had seen it?

RUMSFELD:_ Oh, I let George speak for himself._ The idea that there was some major problem here is just not so._ George Tenet is an enormously talented public servant, and the intelligence community does a darn good job, and as the president said, those words should probably not have been in his speech, and that's fine._ There it is, end of story.

STEPHANOPOULOS:_ Help us understand how this happens, because for a lot of people it's not going to be the end of the story._ There is still going to be an investigation in the Senate._ Back in October, George Tenet goes to the deputy national security advisor and says don't put this information in a major presidential address --

RUMSFELD:_ Look, you're going to have to ask George Tenet or the people involved in that. _ I was not involved._ I do not know._ All I know is what the president said and what George Tenet said, and it seems to me that George Tenet's statement explains the whole thing.

STEPHANOPOULOS:_ But it seems like, from his statement, there was some intent by people in the White House -- they wanted this to be in the speech, and it kept coming back, even though the CIA kept raising doubts.

RUMSFELD:_ That I don't know._ I have no knowledge of that.

STEPHANOPOULOS:_ Do you know if anyone in the Pentagon was pressing for this kind of information to go in presidential public statements?

RUMSFELD:_ Not to my knowledge.

STEPHANOPOULOS:_ Not at all?

RUMSFELD:_ No.

STEPHANOPOULOS:_ When you were before the Senate the other day, you said that you learned that this information -- and I think the question was bogus -- only days ago._ And how could that be?

RUMSFELD:_ I think I said in recent days when it all became public._ I should have said, probably, in recent weeks, because I went back and checked with the intelligence person who briefs me and, apparently, it went like this._ The president's speech was in January._ The next day I said the president had said this, and then in March, ElBaradei, the U.N. IAEA person, said he thought that statement was based on a forged document.

STEPHANOPOULOS:_ Well, and actually prior to that --

RUMSFELD:_ -- this is in March 12th or 8th or something --

STEPHANOPOULOS:_ -- March 8th, I think it was --

RUMSFELD:_ -- yeah, and my intelligence briefer tells me that when that hit the newspapers, I asked them -- what are the facts?_ And they came back and said that the agency thinks that ElBaradei may very well be right, and so it was then that I became aware of it.

STEPHANOPOULOS:_ So it wasn't only in recent days._ You've actually known that for several months --

RUMSFELD:_ -- no, it was in recent weeks or --

STEPHANOPOULOS:_ -- well, a few months, March 8th.

RUMSFELD:_ March, April, May, June -- right -- July -- so it's been four months, right.

STEPHANOPOULOS:_ And you haven't repeated the charge, the allegation, since then -- the evidence?

RUMSFELD:_ No.

STEPHANOPOULOS:_ And as far as you're concerned, the president said the case is closed._ You seem to be saying the same thing.

RUMSFELD:_ I mean -- I don't know what else one can say._ The president said that, in retrospect, those words wouldn't -- should not have been in the speech -- not that they're known to be inaccurate, the British still think they are accurate._ The way he phrased it was accurate.

STEPHANOPOULOS:_ But you don't vouch for the British intelligence here?

RUMSFELD:_ No, we can't, and we shouldn't._ I mean -- we think they do a wonderful job._ We have a very close relationship with the UK._ Of all the intelligence services in the world, I think that one has to say they've done -- over the years, they do a very, very good job.

<snip>
full transcript: http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2003/tr20030713-secdef0384.html
 
Inspector Disputes U.S. Claims on Iraq

VIENNA, Austria - A top U.N. weapons hunter says it would have been "virtually impossible" for Iraq to revive a nuclear bomb program with equipment recently dug up from a Baghdad backyard, as the Bush administration contends.

Jacques Baute said the long-term monitoring of Iraq's nuclear establishment planned by the U.N. Security Council would have stifled any attempt to build a huge uranium-enrichment plant for making bomb material.

"This is a mistake people are making," Baute said. Such contentions ignore the fact that Iraq would have operated for years under international controls had the U.N. plan not been aborted by war, he said.

Baute also said in an interview with The Associated Press that it appears the unearthed cache of uranium enrichment parts, surrendered by an Iraqi scientist last month, lacked critical components, and its accompanying blueprints were marred by errors.

http://www.sanluisobispo.com/mld/sanluisobispo/news/world/6302221.htm
 
"India denies USA of peacekeeping troop support in Iraq, said they would only consider it under a UN mandate."

http://www.iht.com/articles/102734.html

India is setting the standard. Considering the US really needs help with some more troops, I think they might have to give in to a stronger UN role in Iraq, just to save thier asses.
But who knows.
 
Originally posted by CyNiCaL
I think they might have to give in to a stronger UN role in Iraq, just to save thier asses.

US official on Radio Four this morning saying that any blue helmets (UN forces) would have to work under the authority of US forces in Iraq.

john x
 
Iraqis celebrate 1958 coup
BAGHDAD In its first official act on Sunday, the new Iraqi governing council abolished all the old state holidays.
.But Monday, thousands of Iraqis took to the streets of Baghdad to joyfully flout that directive, in commemoration of the coup that ended the monarchy in 1958.
http://www.iht.com/articles/102778.html
 
U.S. Extends Iraq Deployment of Key Army Division
July 14
By Will Dunham
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Facing mounting security threats in Iraq, the U.S. military said on Monday thousands of soldiers from a key Army division would not return home by September as expected and instead stay in Iraq indefinitely.

The 3rd Infantry Division (Mechanized) was the first American unit to enter Baghdad during the war after thrusting from Kuwait through southern Iraq to reach the Iraqi capital, and soldiers from the division now are shouldering a heavy load in the effort to stabilize postwar Iraq.

Maj. Gen. Buford Blount, the division's commander, last week announced plans for the division to return home during July and August after a protracted deployment in the region.

But the Army reversed itself on Monday, saying the return of 9,000 of the division's troops had been put on hold.

The Pentagon deployed about 16,500 3rd Infantry Division soldiers during the war, and about 15,000 remain in Iraq and Kuwait. Thirty-seven soldiers from the division have been killed in the war and its aftermath.

Rich Olson, a spokesman for the Army's Fort Stewart in Georgia, said some elements of the division will return as previously announced, including the 3rd Brigade Combat Team. About 1,000 soldiers have come home in the past week, Olson said, and others are in the process of returning.

But Olson said the 1st Brigade Combat Team, 2d Brigade Combat Team, the 7th Cavalry's 3rd Squadron and other elements of the division will remain in Iraq until further notice.

Olson said he knew of no new time table for their return....
source: <http://www.abcnews.go.com/wire/US/reuters20030714_474.html>
 
A conspiracy of silence?
The proof?
Straw claims that "bits of a centrifuge" were buried in someone’s backyard. I suppose it took 45 minutes to dig it up.

This morning, on BBC Radio 4’s ‘Today’ programme, Jack Straw went through a tortuous process of trying to cover his tracks and if it hadn’t been for the fact that the interviewer, John Humphries, let him off the hook at every critical stage of the interview, he would have been revealed for what he is, a cynical and consummate liar. In unpacking the twin tracks of the politician and the media, much is revealed about the workings of our so-called democracy and how ‘facts’ are manipulated to present a version of reality that supports a pre-determined policy.

The ‘other’ Niger document Unmovic, the UN weapons inspection team are on record as never having received the ‘other’ document on Iraq’a alleged attempt to buy 500 tonnes of yellowcake, yet Straw swore that the ‘proof’ had been sent to Unmovic but he had no idea what had happened to it.

Just think about it; the UK Foreign Office, headed by Jack Straw, about to make probably the most important decision of his miserable life, that of invading another country, can’t figure out what happened to important documents of state upon which decisions about whether or not to invade, depended. A statement that is beyond belief, yet Humphries didn’t push Straw on the issue, he let it slide. That is of course, unless the decision to invade had already been made, but even then, it’s simply not credible that state documents, transported via diplomatic pouch simply don’t arrive. They weren’t sent via the Post Office.

And how did Straw square the US statements on the faked Niger when the US had had them as far back as 2001? He tells us that he was not a position to share the ‘real’ documents with his US allies as they came from a foreign source. Given the paucity of ‘proof’ available to it (hence why use faked documents), is it credible to believe that proof of a ‘smoking gun’ would not have been shared given the vast amount of publicity given to the original assertions? Again, Humphries didn’t push Straw on this either. Hardly an example of critical journalism at work.

Straw also claimed that he’d shared the ‘real proof’ with the Commons Liaison Committee on Foreign Affairs, yet the committee is on record as saying that "it hadn’t seen anything new". And yet again, Humphries refused to go for the jugular and Straw is again let off the hook.



Straw went on to say that in the early 1980s, Iraq had bought "200 tonnes" of yellowcake from Niger. Yet even this assertion has to be viewed with extreme suspicion. All the yellowcake ore (which contains between 0.5 and 0.7% of the essential isotope uranium 235) extracted from deposits is exclusively handled by three companies, "two French and a consortium of French, German, Italian, Spanish and Japanese interests" (Independent letters 12/07/03). All enriching is done in France. In order for Iraq to purchase the yellowcake, it would have had to negotiate with France, not something that could be done in secret. To produce enough uranium 235 to make nuclear weapons would have required hundreds of tonnes of the stuff, and assuming a covert purchase (in itself, a very difficult thing to do), it would have had to have been smuggled overland to Iraq and processed there. Again, Straw’s assertion flies in the face of the facts. The IAEA has shown quite conclusively that Iraq did not possess the capability to purify yellowcake ore.

Yet even more cynical is the fact that the BBC, with much better resources to access information than I possess could not challenge Straw with the information either from die Tageszeitung on the deleted sections of the information supplied to Unmovic on US supplies of nuclear, chemical or biological weapons systems to Iraq or of the information obtained (Washington Post, December 30, 2002) by US Congressman Henry Gonzalez’s House Banking Committee on Kissinger Associates involvement in a $4 billion loan and the supply of nuclear weapons components to Iraq (see http://www.ips-dc.org/iraq/primer4.htm for the details). So the WMD materials Iraq received came either from the US or the UK not Niger. Why did Straw not tell Humphries that the US and the UK were the source of Iraq’s nuclear, biological and chemical capability, and failing that, why didn’t Humphries challenge him to do so?
full: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4105.htm
 
Bush hangs Blair out to dry over Iraqi nuclear claims
Prominent MPs call for Blair to resign

In admitting US doubts over British intelligence reports concerning Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (WMD), the Bush administration has deepened the political crisis of British Prime Minister Tony Blair. In particular, Blair has been hit by recent statements from Washington distancing Bush from British reports, exposed months ago as having been based on forged documents, of Iraqi efforts to purchase uranium from Niger.

Proving the old saw that there is no honour amongst thieves, CIA Director George Tenet was made to take the blame for the inclusion of the uranium charge in President Bush's State of the Union Address in January. Tenet, in turn, made sure that the blame was laid at the door of Britain's Labour government, which first made the accusation public in an intelligence dossier issued in September 2002.

In February 2002, the CIA dispatched former US ambassador to Gabon Joseph Wilson to investigate claims circulating among intelligence agencies of an Iraqi effort to purchase uranium from Niger. Wilson concluded that the alleged Iraqi procurement programme did not exist.

The British claim to the contrary was based on documents that the CIA had deemed to be crude forgeries--said to have been been obtained by Italian authorities (though this is denied by Italy) and passed on to Britain's MI6, which, in turn, passed them to the CIA. When the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna examined the documents, it also found them to be forgeries.

The claim that Bush did not know the allegations were unfounded is ludicrous. It seems everyone else involved in spinning the lie had been told. The CIA had apparently warned US Secretary of State Colin Powell against using the Niger evidence in his speech to the United Nations Security Council in February, and had also told MI6 of its doubts on the documents.

But the Blair government and the Bush administration still used the claim in their propaganda, with the difference that Washington cited Britain as its source. Tenet recently said CIA officials “in the end concurred that the text in the [State of the Union] speech was factually correct, i.e., that the British Government report said that Iraq sought uranium from Africa.” This is a remarkable example of sophistry in defense of using lies to manipulate public opinion.
full:full: http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/jul2003/blar-j15.shtml
 
Back
Top Bottom